Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geographic Disparities in Access to Specialty Care Programs for Early Psychosis in Washington State

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Supported by the 10% set-aside funds in the Community Mental Health Block grant, distributed at the state level, coordinated specialty care (CSC) have been widely disseminated throughout the U.S. This study explores variations in the geographical accessibility of CSC programs by neighborhood level characteristics in Washington State. CSC locations were geocoded. Socioeconomic neighborhood deprivation (i.e., Area deprivation index) and rurality (i.e., Rural–Urban Commuting Area codes) were neighborhood level characteristics extracted from the 2018 American Community Survey. Geographic accessibility of CSC was assessed using a two-step floating catchment area technique and multilevel linear models were used to examine the association between specific neighborhood characteristics and geographic accessibility. The association between access and socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods varied differentially by neighborhood rurality (an interaction effect). Model estimates indicated that the least deprived, metropolitan neighborhoods had the best access (M = 0.38; CI: 0.34, 0.42) and rural neighborhoods in the second most deprived quartile had the worst access (M = 0.16; CI: 0.11, 0.21) to CSC. There was a clear decrease in accessibility for more rural neighborhoods, regardless of other neighborhood characteristics. In conclusions, findings provide important insight into how resource distribution contributes to geographic disparities in access to CSC. The use of spatial analytic techniques has the potential to identify specific neighborhoods and populations where there is a need to expand and increase availability of CSC to ensure access to rural and socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health [Grant Number K01MH117457].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

OO conceptualized the study, interpreted the results of the analyses, and drafted the initial version of the manuscript. SA and GK conducted the spatial and statistical analyses. BS, EF, RD, JL, and MM contributed multiple iterations of the manuscript. All authors have given final approval for submission of the current version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oladunni Oluwoye.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

The Washington State University Institutional Review Board (IRB) determined that this study did not require IRB review because it was not classified as human subjects’ research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 111 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oluwoye, O., Amiri, S., Kordas, G. et al. Geographic Disparities in Access to Specialty Care Programs for Early Psychosis in Washington State. Adm Policy Ment Health 49, 5–12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-021-01137-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-021-01137-3

Keywords

Navigation