Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unearthing the interplay between organisational resources, knowledge and industry 4.0 analytical decision support tools to achieve sustainability and supply chain wellbeing

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to increasing supply chain disruptions and stakeholder demands for more environmentally friendly business models, managers are searching for ways to ensure sustainability and supply chain performance. We propose supply chain well-being (SCWB) as a new concept that offers a more comprehensive way of managing supply networks. Similarly, the opportunities for SCWB and sustainable business performance (SBP) are facilitated through the application of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) data-driven analytical decision support systems (ADSS). In this context, our study examined the role of ADSS in fostering SBP and SCWB by integrating the theoretical perspectives stemming from organisational information processing theory (OIPT), resource-based view and the knowledge-based view. Our conceptual model was tested on 350 Vietnamese manufacturing SME managers using covariance-based structural equation modelling. The findings highlight the importance of understanding how tacit resources are generated, stored, and analysed for effectively leveraging I4.0 decision support tools. This paper contributes to the existing literature in several ways. First, we extend the supply performance literature by proposing SCWB as a more comprehensive approach to managing supply chain networks. We also show how ADSS can be absorbed by SMEs and extend the OIPT literature by elucidating the role of knowledge sharing, generation, and analysis for information processing capabilities. The findings offer policymakers, technology providers and practitioners to focus on information processing fit for achieving SBP and SCWB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to [restrictions—containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants].

References

Download references

Funding

The research reported in this manuscript is funded by “British Council Environmental Links Grant—528201836” for the project, ‘Circular Economy Knowledge Hub: Promoting Multi-Disciplinary Research, Capacity Building and Leadership’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soumyadeb Chowdhury.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Emilia Vann Yaroson declares no conflicts of interest. Soumyadeb Chowdhury has received the funding from the British Council Environmental Links Grant—528201836. Sachin Kumar Mangla declares no conflicts of interest. Prasanta Dey has received the funding from the British Council Environmental Links Grant—528201836.

Ethical approval

All procedures (online survey) involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of Aston University (Aston Business School) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study at the pre-screening stage of the survey.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1: Survey instrument

Appendix 1: Survey instrument

Construct

Proxies measuring the construct

 

Organisational resources

We have digital infrastructure to use decision support systems

Mikalef and Gupta (2021), Dubey et al. (2020a, 2020b), Bag abd Pretorius (2020) and Tseng et al. (2022)

We have human resources with suitable skills and competencies to use and implement DSS

We have a digital and data management strategy

My organisation has strong leadership to adopt and implement data driven green and lean practices

My organisation has access to necessary knowledge knowledgebase to adopt and implement data driven green and lean practices

Specialised instructions and decision-making models are available to adopt and implement data driven green and lean practices

We integrate internal and external data with internal to facilitate high-value analysis of our business environment

We have explored or adopted cloud-based services for processing data and performing analytics

The organization has access to internal and external talent with the right technical skills to support digital implementation and tools

Our managers are able to understand business problems and to direct analytical initiatives to solve them

Our managers are capable of coordinating analytics-related activities in ways that support the organization, suppliers and customers

We are able to anticipate and plan for the organizational resistance to change

We are able to make the necessary changes in human resource policies for process re-engineering

In our organization we take bold and wide-ranging acts to achieve firm objectives

We have inter-departmental coordination and collaboration to collectively achieve business goals aligned to the priorities

Knowledge sharing

My organisation provides means and mechanisms to employees to share knowledge for digital analytics adoption

Grant (1996), Appelbaum (1997), Arpaci (2017), Bauer et al. (2007), Kearns and Sabherwal (2006) and Wamba et al. (2020)

My organisation has means and mechanisms to store knowledge shared and disseminated among employees, for digital analytics adoption

My organisation has means and mechanisms to make knowledge accessible among employees, for digital analytics adoption

My organisation has means and mechanisms to explore and experiment with the knowledge for digital analytics adoption

My organisation has means and mechanisms to apply knowledge in sandbox/pilot projects, for digital analytics adoption

My organisation recognises the importance of knowledge sharing within the teams for digital analytics adoption, integration and managing this change

My organisation has training programmes for employees’ digital analytics education

My organisation has knowledge sharing workshops for employees’ digital analytics education

My organisation has means and mechanisms for knowledge co-creation within teams in the context of technology adoption

I have attended training programmes through my organisation to gain digital analytics knowledge

ADSS

Organisation has employed analytical decision support systems to

Dubey et al. (2020a, 2020b), Bag and Pretorius (2020), and Tseng et al. (2022)

monitor and track products in the value chain

optimize resource utilization, e.g., using waste as a resource, optimal energy consumption

making decisions to support reuse and recycling practices

make green low carbon decisions

monitoring the environmental information (such as toxicity, energy used water used, air pollution)

attract new customers and understand their evolving needs

Making decisions related to business process reconfiguration (logistics/production

Understanding uncertainty in the dynamic market environment

Circular economy practices

We work with clients/suppliers for ecological design of products/services

Dey et al. (2019, 2020), Saha et al. (2022) and Bag et al. (2021)

During the design stage we consider the possibility to reuse products after they have served their initial purpose

We are using recycled materials as inputs in our processes

We have policy and practices in place to dispose machineries and equipment on time

We design our products for reuse, recycle and remanufacture

Manufacturing processes consider zero waste policy

Find ways to reintroduce end-of-life items into our supply chain or someone else’s supply chain

Decrease the usage of non-recyclable raw materials in our processes

Green operations

Use renewable energy to reduce impact on environment

Dubey et al. (2020a, 2020b), Bag and Pretorius (2020), and Tseng et al. (2022)

practices for reducing the consumption of energy in the production processes

employ just in time for eco-friendly forward and reverse logistics practices

practices to reduce impact on environment (water, air and noise pollution)

ensure that we use treatments and filtrations to extend the use of industrial resources (such as oils, acids, lubricants)

energy efficient manufacturing and production facilities

product designs consider eco-friendly manufacturing practises

replaced non-recyclable raw materials with renewable, recyclable or biodegradable inputs

rate our suppliers’ compliances with environmental legislation

Supply chain dynamism

Adapted SC processes to decrease lead times

Inman and Green (2021), Braunscheidel and Suresh (2009), Bak et al. (2020) and Queiroz et al. (2021)

Our operational processes can be easily reconfigured and optimised to cope up with uncertainties

Adapted SC processes to decrease new product

development cycle time

We have flexibility in planning and operations

We have flexibility in manufacturing / operations through layout and processes

We are able to satisfy evolving needs of consumers and trade partners in the context of environmentally friendly choices

Organization reacts immediately to incorporate changes into its manufacturing processes and systems

Production processes are flexible in terms of product models and configurations

Organization has the capabilities to meet and exceed the levels of product quality demanded by its customers

Organization has the capabilities to deliver products to customers in a timely manner and to quickly respond to changes in deliver requirements

Risk management

We identify risks in our SC (short term and long term)

El Baz ad Ruel (2021), Yang et al. (2021) and Ho et al. (2015)

In the course of our risk analysis for all SC partners, we define early warning indicators

In the course of our risk analysis we analyse the possible impact of supply chain risks

In the course of our risk analysis, we classify and prioritize our supply chain risks

In the course of our risk analysis, we demonstrate possible reaction strategies

Supply chain risk management is an important activity in our company

In the course of our risk analysis, we evaluate the urgency of our supply chain risks

There is a systematic strategy to communicate the risk management plan to employees

My organisation performs period reviews of risks associated with physical and digital assets

Sustainable business performance

We have reduced our manufacturing costs in recent years

Dey et al. (2019, 2020), Saha et al. (2022) and Epstein and Roy (2003)

We have increased average return on net assets from green products

We have reduced Inventory carrying cost

We have reduced Cost of transportation and handling

We have reduced business waste across our processes

We have improved compliance with environmental standards

We have decreased carbon emissions

We increased revenue from green products and practices

We have improved work safety in recent years

We have improved work environment in recent years

We have commitment from employees and managers towards incorporating environmental management

We have created jobs to support the community and thus contributed to nation’s entrepreneurial growth

Supply chain wellbeing

We are able to cope with changes brought by the supply chain disruption

El Baz ad Ruel (2021), Modgil et al. (2021a, 2021b), Weiland and Durach (2021), Gu and Huo (2021), and Queiroz et al. (2021)

We are able to adapt to the supply chain disruption easily

We are able to provide a quick response to the supply chain disruption

We are able to maintain high situational awareness at all

We are able to reconfigure business processes considering environmental issues to remain competitive in the market

We are able to trace and track the activities in our SC

We are able to maintain diligence in SC (e.g., ethical sourcing, environmentally certified suppliers)

We collaborate and cooperate with our stakeholders and partners to make SC efficient

We make stakeholders and partners an integral part of the decision-making process

We ensure to meet the needs of the consumers following ethical principles

We remain obedient to the government regulations and policies

We ensure that work practices in our SC is ethical (fair wages, fair labour and fair trade)

We assess third-party risk by understanding our firm’s third-party universe

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yaroson, E.V., Chowdhury, S., Mangla, S.K. et al. Unearthing the interplay between organisational resources, knowledge and industry 4.0 analytical decision support tools to achieve sustainability and supply chain wellbeing. Ann Oper Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05845-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05845-5

Keywords

Navigation