Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Supply chain network redesign problem for major beverage organization in ASEAN region

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global supply chains engage in economic exchanges and flows of capital across borders. The free flow of economic goods opens opportunities for organizations to optimize supply chains across global networks and develop socially embedded interdependent relationships. This study explores issues related to multi-echelon supply chains and the effect of economic integration on a major beverage company’s distribution in the emerging Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Economic Community (AEC). Case-based modeling is conducted to resolve discrepancies in perceptions of supply chain network formation between academic research and industry. This paper determines the network configuration involving minimum gross cost while considering the impacts of barriers to resource accessibility and external economic decisions on infrastructure in a real-world supply chain network where end products of in-house manufacturing are acquired from external sources and incorporated in warehouses. A mixed-integer linear programming model was developed to design a multi-stage supply chain network using ILOG LOGIC NET. The model explores location and capacity selection for plants and warehouses in parallel with capacity selection for suppliers and transportation in the AEC, and we determine the optimal flow of products and product families through the network medium. Three different scenarios were evaluated to obtain differing resolutions that can empower decision-makers to understand influences on overall supply chain networks based on futuristic development preferences and regional economic integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://logisticsviews.blogspot.sg/2012/11/the-future-of-global-supply-chain.html#!/2012/11/the-future-of-global-supply-chain.html.

  2. Graves, S.C. and Tomlin, B.T. (2003) Process flexibility in supply chains. Management Science, 49, 907–919.

  3. http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/air-transport/2016-02-11/changi-airport-outlines-expansion-plans.

  4. https://www.singaporepsa.com/our-business/terminals.

  5. http://service.suvarnabhumiairport.com/business_phase2_en.php.

  6. http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/coca-cola-singapore-beverages-to-shut-Singapore-plant-commits-us100m-investment.

References

  • AEC. (2015). ASEAN economic community blueprint 2025, Secretariat of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Jakarta. https://www.asean.org/storage/2016/03/AECBP_2025r_FINAL.pdf

  • Amin, S. H., & Baki, F. (2017). A facility location model for global closed-loop supply chain network design. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 41, 316–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arntzen, B. C., Brown, G. G., Harrison, T. P., & Trafton, L. L. (1995). Global supply chain management at digital equipment corporation. Interfaces, 25, 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broekmeulen, R. A., Sternbeck, M. G., van Donselaar, K. H., & Kuhn, H. (2017). Decision support for selecting the optimal product unpacking location in a retail supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.09.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortinhal, M. J., Lopes, M. J., & Melo, M. T. (2019). A multi-stage supply chain network design problem with in-house production and partial product outsourcing. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 70, 572–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.01.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farahani, R. Z., Drezner, Z., & Asgari, N. (2009). Single facility location and relocation problem with time dependent weights and discrete planning horizon. Annals of Operations Research, 167(1), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0338-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S. C., & Willems, S. P. (2005). Optimizing the supply chain configuration for new product. Management Science., 51(8), 1165–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddadsisakht, A., & Ryan, S. M. (2018). Closed-loop supply chain network design with multiple transportation modes under stochastic demand and uncertain carbon tax. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosoda, J., Funaki, K., & Chida, T. (2016). Recent Issues in international supply chain network design-economic partnership modelling. IMI Workshop on Optimization in the Real World, Optimization in the Real World: TOward Solving Real-World Optimization Problems, 13, 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahani, H., Abbasi, B., & Talluri, S. (2019). Supply chain network redesign: A technical note on optimising financial performance. Decision Sciences, 50(6), 1319–1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahani, H., Abbasi, B., Alavifard, F., & Talluri, S. (2018). Supply chain network redesign with demand and price uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 205, 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo, M. T., Nickel, S., & Saldanha-Da-Gama, F. (2009). Facility location and supply chain management—A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miltenburg, J. (2015). Changes in manufacturing facility-, network-, and strategy-types at the Michelin North America Company from 1950 to 2014. International Journal of Production Research, 53(10), 3175–3191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Industry. (2016). Industry facts and figures. Ministry of Industry Republic of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagiwa, K., Song, H., & Vandenbussche, H. (2016). Size matters! Who is bashing whom in trade war? International Review of Economics & Finance, 45, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, K., Yamada, T., & Tan, K. H. (2019). The impact of Brexit on designing a material-based global supply chain network for Asian manufacturers. Management of Environmental Quality, 30(5), 980–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narjoko, D. (2015). AEC blueprint implementation performance and challenges: non-tariff measures and non-tariff barriers. Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia. http://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2015-36.pdf.

  • Owen, S. H., & Daskin, M. S. (1998). Strategic facility location: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 111(3), 423–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00186-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadghiani, N. S., Torabi, S. A., & Sahebjamnia, N. (2015). Retail supply chain network design under operational and disruption risks. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 75, 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., Simchi-Levi, E., & Shankar, R. (2008). Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies and case studies. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.

  • Soon, J. M., Chandia, M., & Regenstein, J. M. (2017). Halal integrity in the food supply chain. British Food Journal, 119(1), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, R. W. (2012). Non-tariff measures and the WTO, WTO Staff Working Paper, No. ERSD-2012-01. World Trade Organization (WTO), Geneva.

  • Tsiakis, P., & Papageorgiou, L. G. (2008). Optimal production allocation and distribution supply chain networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 468–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., & Martinez-zarzoso, I. (2014). China economic review a panel data analysis of trade creation and trade diversion effects: The case of ASEAN - China free trade area. China Economic Review, 29, 138–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz, H., Yoon, J., Talluri, S., & Ho, W. (2016). Reliable supply chain network design. Decision Sciences, 47(4), 661–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the editor-in-chief and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay Kumar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

See Tables

Table 9 Lead-time matrix

9 and

Table 10 Cost matrix

10.

Appendix B

See Figs.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Plant's utilization

14 and

Fig. 15
figure 15

New plant utilization after lines’ capacity adjustment

15.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panchal, G.B., Mirzahosseinian, H., Tiwari, S. et al. Supply chain network redesign problem for major beverage organization in ASEAN region. Ann Oper Res 324, 1067–1098 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04571-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04571-0

Keywords

Navigation