Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Paths And Costs Of Adjustment In Dynamic DEA Models: With Application To Chilean Department Stores

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we propose a range of dynamic data envelopment analysis (DEA) models which allow information on costs of adjustment to be incorporated into the DEA framework. We first specify a basic dynamic DEA model predicated on a number of simplifying assumptions. We then outline a number of extensions to this model to accommodate asymmetric adjustment costs, non-static output quantities, non-static input prices, and non-static costs of adjustment, technological change, quasi-fixed inputs and investment budget constraints. The new dynamic DEA models provide valuable extra information relative to the standard static DEA models—they identify an optimal path of adjustment for the input quantities, and provide a measure of the potential cost savings that result from recognising the costs of adjusting input quantities towards the optimal point. The new models are illustrated using data relating to a chain of 35 retail department stores in Chile. The empirical results illustrate the wealth of information that can be derived from these models, and clearly show that static models overstate potential cost savings when adjustment costs are non-zero.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afriat, S.N. (1972). “Efficiency Estimation of Production Functions.” International Economic Review, 13, 568–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boles, J.N. (1966). “Efficiency Squared-Efficiency Computation of Efficiency Indexes.” In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of Western Farms Economic Association, pp. 137–142.

  • Banker, R.D. and R.C. Morey. (1986). “Efficiency for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs.” Operations Research, 34, 513–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R.G. (1988). Applied Production Analysis: A Dual Approach. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes (1978). “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.W., L.M. Seiford, and K. Tone. (2000). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Mateo, F. (2003). Incorporation of Costs of Adjustment in DEA Models Selection of Optimal Paths. Ph.D. Thesis, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.

  • Epstein, L.G. (1981). “Duality Theory and Functions Forms for Dynamic Factor Demand.” Review of Economic Studies, 48, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and C.A. Lovell. (1994). Production Frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and C.A. Lovell. (1985). Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing Co., Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R. and S. Grosskopf. (1996). Intertemporal Production Frontier. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrel, M.J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of Statistical Society, Series A, CXX, Part 3, 253–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golany, B. and Y. Roll (1993). “Some Extensions of Techniques to Handle Non-discretionary factors in DEA.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 4, 419–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luh, Y. and S. Stefanou (1996). “Estimating Dynamic Dual Models under Nonstatic Expectations.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 991–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, K. and R. Cooper (1980). “Intertemporal Duality: Application to the Theory of the Firm.” Econometrica, 7, 1755–1762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemoto, J and M. Goto (1999). “Dynamic Data Envelopment Analysis: Modeling Intertemporal Behavior of a Firm in the Presence of Productive Inefficiencies.” Economics Letters, 64, 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemoto, J and M. Goto (2003). “Measurement of Dynamic Efficiency in Production: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Japanese Electric Utilities.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19, 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J.K. (1995). Dynamics of Data Envelopment Analysis. Theory of Systems Efficiency. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staat, M. (1999). “Treating Non-discretionary Variables One Way or the Other: Implications for Efficiency Scores and Their Interpretation.” In Westermann, G. (ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis in the Service Sector. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp. 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treadway, A.B. (1970), “Adjustment Costs and Variable Inputs in the Theory of the Competitive Firm.” Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filadelfo de Mateo.

Additional information

This paper arises out the senior author's PhD thesis at the University of New England, Australia. The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. George E. Battese for his comments on earlier drafts of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mateo, F.d., Coelli, T. & O'Donnell, C. Optimal Paths And Costs Of Adjustment In Dynamic DEA Models: With Application To Chilean Department Stores. Ann Oper Res 145, 211–227 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0034-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0034-7

Keywords

Navigation