Skip to main content
Log in

Supervised ordering by regression combined with Thurstone’s model

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In this paper, we advocate a learning task that deals with the orders of objects, which we call the Supervised Ordering task. The term order means a sequence of objects sorted according to a specific property, such as preference, size, cost. The aim of this task is to acquire the rule that is used for estimating an appropriate order of a given unordered object set. The rule is acquired from sample orders consisting of objects represented by attribute vectors. Developing solution methods for accomplishing this task would be useful, for example, in carrying out a questionnaire survey to predict one’s preferences. We develop a solution method based on a regression technique imposing a Thurstone’s model and evaluate the performance and characteristics of these methods based on the experimental results of tests using both artificial data and real data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti A (1996) Categorical data analysis. Wiley

  • Anderson JA and Philips PR (1981). Regression, discrimination and measurement models for ordered categorical variables. J R Stat Soc (C) 30(1): 22–31

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold BC, Balakrishnan N, Nagaraja HN (1992) A first course in order statistics. Wiley

  • Arrow KJ (1963) Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn. Yale University Press

  • Babington Smith B (1950) Discussion on professor ross’s paper. J R Stat Soc (B) 12:53–56, (A. S. C. Ross, Philological Probability Problems, pp 19–41)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WW, Schapire RE and Singer Y (1999). Learning to order things. J Artif Intel Res 10: 243–270

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • de Condorcet M (1995) On constitution and the functions of provincial assemblies (1788). In: McLean I, Urken AB (eds) Classics of social choice, The University of Michigan Press, chap 7, pp 113–144

  • Fligner MA and Verducci JS (1990). Posterior probabilities for a consensus ordering. Psychometrika 55(1): 53–63

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi C (1952). On the prediction of phenomena from qualitative data and the quantification of qualitative data from the mathematico-statistical point of view. Ann Inst Stat Math 3: 69–98

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herbrich R, Graepel T, Bollmann-Sdorra P, Obermayer K (1998) Learning preference relations for information retrieval. In: ICML-98 Workshop: text categorization and machine learning, pp 80–84

  • Joachims T (2002) Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 133–142

  • Kamishima T (2003) Nantonac collaborative filtering: Recommendation based on order responses. In: Proceedings of the 9th International conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 583–588

  • Kamishima T, Akaho S (2004) Filling-in missing objects in orders. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International conference on data mining

  • Kamishima T, Fujiki J (2003) Clustering orders. In: Proceedings of the 6th International conference on discovery science, pp 194–207, [LNAI 2843]

  • Kendall M, Gibbons JD (1990) Rank correlation methods, 5th edn. Oxford University Press

  • Lebanon G, Lafferty J (2002) Crankng: combining rankings using conditional probability models on permutations. In: Proceedings of the 19th International conference on machine learning, pp 363–370

  • Mallows CL (1957). Non-null ranking models. I Biometrika 44: 114–130

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mannila H, Meek C (2000) Global partial orders from sequential data. In: Proceedings of the 6th International conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 161–168

  • Marden JI (1995) Analyzing and modeling rank data, monographs on statistics and applied probability, vol 64. Chapman & Hall

  • McCullagh P (1980). Regression models for ordinal data. J R Stat Soc (B) 42(2): 109–142

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TM (1997) Machine learning. The McGraw-Hill

  • Mosteller F (1951). Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: I—the least squares solution assuming equal standard deviations and equal correlations. Psychometrika 16(1): 3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamori Y (2000) Kansei data Kaiseki. Morikita Shuppan Co., Ltd., (in Japanese)

  • Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH (1957) The Measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press

  • Plackett RL (1975). The analysis of permutations. J R Stat Soc (C) 24(2): 193–202

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sai Y, Yao YY, Zhong N (2001) Data analysis and mining in ordered information tables. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International conference on data mining, pp 497–504

  • Thurstone LL (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychol Rev 34: 273–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshihiro Kamishima.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamishima, T., Akaho, S. Supervised ordering by regression combined with Thurstone’s model. Artif Intell Rev 25, 231–246 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-007-9050-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-007-9050-5

Keywords

Navigation