Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ecosystem services in human-dominated landscapes: insectivory in agroforestry systems

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite of being structurally simpler and species-impoverished than natural forests, agroforestry plantations can act as a secondary habitat for native species and sustain some biodiversity. In particular, insectivores can provide important ecosystem services such as insectivory, indirectly benefiting plants through the reduction of herbivory and increasing productivity, by diminishing herbivores abundance. The lending of these services could occur in agroforestry systems, and in the same magnitude that in natural environments, however it has not yet been assessed whether the direct effect of insectivores over insects and indirect effect on plants differ between natural and agroforestry environments depending on possible modulating factors such as climatic region, type of insectivore, trophic group of the preyed arthropod and length of insectivores experimental exclusion. In this study, through a meta-analysis, it was assessed the provision of ecosystem services by insectivores in agroforestry systems compared to natural systems, contrasting it with the modulating factors mentioned. In general, insectivorous species reduced arthropod abundance and plant herbivory, and increased plant productivity. The magnitude and direction of these effects did not differ between natural and agroforestry systems, and neither did between different climatic regions, type of insectivore, preyed arthropod trophic groups nor experiment length. The effect of insectivores on productivity can vary based on the variable used to measure productivity. Our results evidence the provision of services by the insectivores present in plantations, independently of factors that could modulate its magnitude and direction. In this way, enhancing the existence of these important interactions within plantations could represent a win–win scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen R, Platt K, Wiser S (1995) Biodiversity in New Zealand plantations. N Z For 39(4):26–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeland WT, Beier P, Kolb T, Whitham TG (2010) A conditional trophic cascade: birds benefit faster growing trees with strong links between predators and plants. Ecology 91:73–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farberk S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7:260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garibaldi LA, Kitzberger T, Mazía N, Chaneton EJ (2010) Nutrient supply and bird predation additively control insect herbivory and tree growth in two contrasting forest habitats. Oikos 119:337–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley M (2002) Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. For Ecol Manag 155:81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F (2006) World map of Köppen-Geigen climate classification. Meteorol Z 15:259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH (1989) Food webs. In: Cherrett JM (ed) Ecological concepts. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 48–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg JS, Lichtenberg DA (2002) Weak trophic interactions among birds, insects and white oak saplings (Quercus alba). Am Midl Nat 148:338–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Hobbs RJ (2004) Fauna conservation in Australian plantation forests—a review. Biol Conserv 119:151–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losey JE, Vaughan M (2006) The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. Bioscience 56:311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäntylä E, Klemola T, Laaksonen T (2011) Birds help plants: a meta-analysis of top-down trophic cascades caused by avian predators. Oecologia 165:143–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto T, Itioka T, Nishida T (2003) Cascading effects of a specialist parasitoid on plant biomass in a citrus agroecosystem. Ecol Res 18:651–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney KA, Linhart YB (2006) Contrasting cascades: increase pine but not parasitic mistletoe growth. J Anim Ecol 75:350–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney KA, Gruner DS, Barber NA, Van Bael SA, Philpott SM, Greenberg R (2010) Interactions among predators and the cascading effects of vertebrate insectivores on arthropod communities and plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:7335–7340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nájera A, Simonetti JA (2010) Enhancing avifauna in commercial plantations. Conserv Biol 24:319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Vandermeer JH, Bautista GL, Ibarra-Nuñez G, Greenberg R, Bichier P, Langridge S (2004) Greater predation in shaded coffee farms: the role of resident neotropical birds. Ecology 85:2677–2681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Holt RD (1992) Intraguild predation: the dynamics of complex trophic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 7:151–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Strong DR (1996) Food web complexity and community dynamics. Am Nat 147:813–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez PA, Simonetti JA (2011) Conservation opportunities in commercial plantations: the case of mammals. J Nat Conserv 19:351–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg SM, Adams D, Gurevitch J (2000) MetaWin: statistical software for meta-analysis version 2. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz OJ, Hambäck PA, Beckerman AP (2000) Trophic cascades in terrestrial systems: a review of the effects of carnivore removals on plants. Am Nat 155:141–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwenk WS, Strong AM, Sillett TS (2010) Effects of bird predation on arthropod abundance and tree growth across an elevational gradient. J Avian Biol 41:367–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonetti JA, Grez AA, Bustamante RO (2006) Interacciones y procesos en el bosque maulino fragmentado. In: Grez AA, Simonetti JA, Bustamante RO (eds) Biodiversidad en ambientes fragmentados de Chile: patrones y procesos a diferentes escalas. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, pp 99–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonetti JA, Grez AA, Estades CF (eds) (2012) Biodiversity conservation in agroforestry landscapes: challenges and opportunities. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR (1992) Are trophic cascades all wet? Differentation and donor-control in specious ecosystems. Ecology 73:747–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay A, Mineau P, Stewart RK (2001) Effects of bird predation on some pest insect populations in corn. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bael SA, Brawn JD (2005) The direct and indirect effects of insectivory by birds in two contrasting Neotropical forests. Oecologia 143:106–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bael SA, Philpott SM, Greenberg R, Bichier P, Barber NA, Mooney KA, Gruner DS (2008) Birds as predators in tropical agroforestry systems. Ecology 89:928–934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by Fondecyt 1095046; partial support was also provided by Programa Domeyko-Biodiversidad (IT3), Universidad de Chile.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier A. Simonetti.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

See Table 2

Table 2 Publications used for the meta-analysis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poch, T.J., Simonetti, J.A. Ecosystem services in human-dominated landscapes: insectivory in agroforestry systems. Agroforest Syst 87, 871–879 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9603-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9603-3

Keywords

Navigation