Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hanging-drop multicellular spheroids as a model of tumour angiogenesis

  • Published:
Angiogenesis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The establishment of a vascular network within tumours is a key step in the progression towards an aggressive, metastatic state, with poor prognosis. We have developed a novel in vitro model to specifically capture the interaction between endothelial cells and solid tumours. Micro-vascularised in vitro tumour constructs were produced by introducing endothelial cells to multicellular spheroids formed in hanging drops. Upon introduction, the endothelial cells migrated into the tumour spheroid, establishing tubular networks and luminal structures. This system relies on the natural pro-angiogenic capacity of multicellular spheroids, and does not require the addition of exogenous angiogenic factors, or use of extracellular-matrix substitutes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beecken W, Kramer W, Jonas D et al. New molecular mediators in tumor angiogenesis. J Cell Mol Med 2000; 4(4): 262–269.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gourley M, Williamson J. Angiogenesis: New targets for the development of anticancer chemotherapies. Curr Pharm Des 2000; 6(4): 417–39.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kerbel R. Tumor angiogenesis: Past, present and the near future. Carcinogenesis 2000; 21(3): 505–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fidler I. The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited. Nat Rev Cancer 2003; 3(6): 453–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fontanini G, Lucchi M, Vignati S et al. Angiogenesis as a prognostic indicator of survival in non-small-cell lung carcinoma: A prospective study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89(12): 881–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Koomagi R, Volm M. Tissue-factor expression in human non-smallcell lung carcinoma measured by immunohistochemistry: correlation between tissue factor and angiogenesis. Int J Cancer 1998; 79(1): 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hamada K, Kuratsu J, Saitoh Y. Expression of tissue factor correlates with grade of malignancy in human glioma. Cancer 1996; 77(9): 1877–83.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nakasaki T, Wada H, Shigemori C et al. Expression of tissue factor and vascular endothelial growth factor is associated with angiogenesis in colorectal cancer. Am J Hematol 2002; 69(4): 247–54.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaku T, Kamura T, Kinukawa N et al. Angiogenesis in endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 1997; 80(4): 741–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vermeulen P, Gasparini G, Fox S. Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumours: An international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation. Eur J Cancer 1996; 32A(14): 2474–84.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Genentech: 2004, ‘Avastin (bevacizumab)'. http://www.gene.com/gene/ pipeline/status/oncology/avastin/index.jsp.

  12. Sato Y. Molecular diagnosis of tumour angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic cancer therapy. Int J Clin Oncol 2003; 8: 200–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McCarthy M. Antiangiogenesis drug promising for metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 2003; 361(9373): 1959.

  14. Auerbach R, Akhtar N, Lewis R, Shinners B. Angiogenesis assays: problems and pitfalls. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2003; 19 (1–2) 167–72.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vernon R, Gooden M. New technologies in vitro for analysis of cell movement on or within collagen gels. Matrix Biol 2002; 21(8): 661–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vernon R, Sage E. A novel, quantitative model for study of endothelial cell migration and sprout formation within three-dimensional collagen matrices. Microvasc Res 1999; 57(2): 118–33.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Donovan D, Brown NJ, Bishop ET, Lewis CE. Comparison of three in vitro human ‘angiogenesis’ assays with capillaries formed in vivo. Angiogenesis: 2001; 4(2): 113–21.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Montaez E, Casaroli-Marano R, Vilar S, Pagan R. Comparative study of tube assembly, in three-dimensional collagne matix and on Matrigel coats. Angiogenesis 2002; 5: 167–72.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Auerbach R, Lewis R, Shinners B et al. Angiogenesis assays: A critical overview. Clin Chem 2003; 49 (1): 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vailhe B, Vittet D, Feige J et al. In vitro models of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Lab Invest 2001; 81(4): 439–52.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bishop E, Bell G, Bloor S et al. An in vitro model of angiogenesis: Basic features. Angiogenesis 1999; 3: 335–44.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ment L, Stewart W, Scaramuzzino D, Madri J. An in vitro threedimensional coculture model of cerebral microvascular angiogenesis and differentiation. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 1997; 33(9): 684–91.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Korff T, Kimmina S, Martiny-Baron G, Augustin HG. Blood vessel maturation in a 3-dimensional spheroidal coculture model: Direct contact with smooth muscle cells regulates endothelial cell quiescence and abrogates VEGF responsiveness. FASEB J 2001; 15(2): 447–57.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Korff T, Augustin H. Integration of endothelial cells in multicellular spheroids prevents apoptosis and induces differentiation. J Cell Biol 1998; 143(5): 1341–52.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Haspel H, Scicli G, McMahon G, Scicli A. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-associated tyrosine kinase activity with SU5416 blocks sprouting in the microvascular endothelial cell spheroid model of angiogenesis. Microvasc Res 2002; 63(3): 304–15.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kozien D, Gerol M, Hendey B, RayChaudhury A. A novel in vitro model of tumor angiogenesis. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2000; 36(9): 555–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Oudar O. Spheroids: Relation between tumour and endothelial cells. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2000; 36(2–3): 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chopra V, Dinh TV, Hannigan EV. Three-dimensional endothelialtumor epithelial cell interactions in human cervical cancers. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 1997; 33(6): 432–42.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Knuchel R, Feichtinger J, Recktenwald A et al. Interactions between bladder tumor cells as tumor spheroids from the cell line J82 and human endothelial cells in vitro. J Urol 1988; 139(3): 640–5.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Offner F, Bigalke I, Schiefer J et al. Interaction of human malignant melanoma tumor spheroids with endothelium and reconstituted basement membrane: Modulation by RGDS. Int J Cancer 1993; 54(3): 506–12.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kelm J, Timmins N, Brown C et al. Method for generation of homogeneous multicellular tumor spheroids applicable to a wide variety of cell types. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003; 83(2): 173–80.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wartenberg M, Dnmez F, Ling F et al. Tumour-induced angiogenesis studied in confrontation cultures of multicellular tumor spheroids and embryoid bodies grown from pluripotent embryonic stem cells. FASEB J 2001; 15: 995–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shweiki D, Neeman M, Itin A, Keshet E. Induction of vascular endothelial growth factor expression by hypoxia and by glucose deficiency in multicell spheroids: Implications for tumor angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92(3): 768–72.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lazareff J, Suwinski R, De Rosa R, Olmstead C. Tumor volume and growth kinetics in hypothalamic-chiasmatic pediatric low grade gliomas. Pediatr Neurosurg 1999; 30(6): 312–9.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Marusic M, Bajzer Z, Vuk-Pavlovic, Freyer J. Tumour growth in vivo and as multicellualr spheroids compared by mathematical models. Bull Math Biol 1994; 56: 617–631.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kunz-Schughart L, Mueller-Klieser W. Three-dimensional culture. In. Masters J (ed): Animal Cell Culture: A Practical Approach. New York: Oxford University Press, 3rd edition, 2000; 123–84.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hemmerlein B, Kugler A, Ozisik R et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression, angiogenesis, and necrosis in renal cell carcinomas. Virchows Arch 2001; 439(5): 645–52.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Guan M, Jin J, Su B et al. Tissue factor expression and angiogenesis in human glioma. Clin Biochem 2002; 35(4): 321–5.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sonoda T, Kobayashi H, Kaku T et al. Expression of angiogenesis factors in monolayer culture, multicellular spheroid and in vivo transplanted tumor by human ovarian cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett 2003; 196(2): 229–37.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Burns P, Wilson D. Angiogenesis mediated by metabolites is dependent on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Angiogenesis 2003; 6(1): 73–7.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pavlakovic H, Havers W, Schweigerer L. Multiple angiogenesis stimulators in a single malignancy: Implications for anti-angiogenic tumour therapy. Angiogenesis 2001; 4(4): 259–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory for Biological Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia

    Nicholas Timmins, Stefanie Dietmair & Lars Nielsen

Authors
  1. Nicholas Timmins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefanie Dietmair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lars Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Timmins, N., Dietmair, S. & Nielsen, L. Hanging-drop multicellular spheroids as a model of tumour angiogenesis. Angiogenesis 7, 97–103 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-004-8911-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-004-8911-7

Search

Navigation