Abstract
Based on the currently largest available dataset of phytoplankton in lakes in northern Europe, we quantified the responses of three major phytoplankton classes to eutrophication. Responses were quantified by modelling the proportional biovolumes of a given group along the eutrophication gradient, using generalized additive models. Chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) was chosen as a proxy for eutrophication because all classes showed more consistent responses to Chl-a than to total phosphorus. Chrysophytes often dominate in (ultra-) oligotrophic lakes, and showed a clear decrease along the eutrophication gradient. Pennate diatoms were found to be most abundant at moderate eutrophication level (spring-samples). Cyanobacteria often dominate under eutrophic conditions, especially in clearwater lakes at Chl-a levels >10 μg l−1 (late summer samples). We compare the relationships among types of lakes, based on the lake typology of the northern geographic intercalibration group, and among countries sharing common lake types. Significant differences were found especially between humic and clearwater lakes, and between low- and moderately alkaline lakes, but we could not identify significant differences between shallow and deep lakes. Country-specific differences in response curves were especially pronounced between lakes in Norway and Finland, while Swedish lakes showed an intermediate pattern, indicating that country-specific differences reflect large-scale geographic and climatic differences in the study area.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- Chlorophyll-a:
-
Chl-a
References
Andersen T (1997) Pelagic nutrient cycles: herbivores as sources and sinks. Ecological Studies, vol 129. Springer, Berlin
Britton G (1983) The biochemistry of natural pigments. Cambridge University Press
Brettum P (1989) Alger som indikator på vannkvalitet i norske innsjøer. Planteplankton. Niva-Rapport 0-86116:1–111 (in Norwegian)
Downing JA, Watson SB, McCauley E (2001) Predicting Cyanobacteria dominance in lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1905–1908
European Commission (2000) Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2000/60/EC establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal 2000 L 327/1, European Commission, Brussels
EU Intercalibration report: Lakes 2007. http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/jrc/jrc_eewai/library?l=/intercalibration_2/technical_report_2007/lakes&vm=detailed&sb=Title
Hörnström E (1981) Trophic characterization of lakes by means of qualitative phytoplankton analysis. Limnologica 13:246–261
Intercalibration Guidance (2005) Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance on the intercalibration process 2004–2006. Guidance document no.14. European Communities 2005. ISBN 92-894-9471-9
Kohl JG, Nicklisch A (1988) Ökophysiologie der Algen. Akademischer Verlag, Berlin (in German)
Komárek J, Anagnostidis K (1999) Cyanoprocaryota 1. Teil: Chroococcales. Gustav Fischer, Jena, Germany
Lepistö L, Räike A, Pietiläinen O-P (1999) Long-term changes of phytoplankton in a eutrophicated boreal lake during the past one hundred years (1893–1998). Algol Stud 94:223–244
Lyche A. (1990) Cluster analysis of plankton community structure in 21 lakes along a gradient of trophy. Verh Int Verein Limnol 24:586–591
Moe J, Dudley B, Ptacnik R (2008) REBECCA databases: experiences from compilation and analyses of monitoring data from 5000 lakes in 20 European countries. Aquatic Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-008-9190-y
Naumann E (1919) Några synpunkter angående limnoplanktons ökologi, med särskild hänsyn till fytoplankton. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 13:51–58 (in Swedish)
Nygaard G (1949) Hydrobiological studies on some Danish ponds and lakes. II: the quotient hypothesis and some little known or new phytoplankton organisms. Kunglige Danske Vidensk Selskab 7:1–242
Olrik K, Blomqvist P, Brettum P et al (1998) Methods for quantitative assessment of phytoplankton in freshwaters, part I. Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm, 86 pp
Phillips G, Pietiläinen OP, Carvalho L, Solimini A, Lyche Solheim A, Cardoso AC (2008) Chlorophyll—nutrient relationships of different lake types using a large European dataset. Aquatic Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10452-008-9180-0
Ptacnik R, Diehl S, Berger S (2003) Performance of sinking and non-sinking phytoplankton taxa in a gradient of mixing depths. Limnol Oceanogr 48:1903–1912
Ptacnik R, Solimini AG, Andersen A, Tamminen T, Brettum P, Lepistö L, Willén E, Rekolainen S (2008) Diversity predicts stability and resource use efficiency in natural phytoplankton communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:5134–5138
Raven JA (1995) Comparative aspects of chrysophyte nutrition with emphasis on carbon, phosphorus and nitrogen. In: Sandgren CD et al (eds) Chrysophyte algae: ecology, phylogeny and development. Cambride University Press, New York
R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Reynolds CS (1980) Phytoplankton assemblages and their periodicity in stratifying lake systems. Holarctic Ecol 3:141–159
Reynolds CS (1984) The ecology of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, New York
Sakamoto Y, Ishiguro M, Kitagawa G (1986) Akaike information criterion statistics. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Sandgren C. D. (1988) The ecology of chrysophyte flagellates: their growth and perennation strategies as freshwater phytoplankton. In: Sandgren CD (ed) Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 9–104
Skjelkvåle BL, Henriksen A, Jónsson GS, Mannio J, Wilander A, Jensen JP, Fjeld E, Lien L (2001) Chemistry of lakes in the Nordic region—Denmark, Finland with Åland, Iceland, Norway with Svalbard and Bear Island, and Sweden. SNO 4391-2001. NIVA, Oslo, 39 pp
Sommer U (1991) Phytoplankton: directional succession and forced cycles. In: Remmert H (ed) The mosaic-cycle concept of ecosystems, ecological studies 85. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany
Teiling E (1955) Some mesotrophic phytoplankton indicators. Int Assoc Theor Appl Limn XII:212–215
Teubner K, Tolotti M, Greisberger S et al (2003) Steady state phytoplankton in a deep pre-alpine lake: species and pigments of epilimnetic versus metalimetic assemblages. Hydrobiologia 502:49–64
Vollenweider RA (1989) Eutrophication. In: Meybeck M, ChapmanD, Helmer R (eds) Global freshwater quality—a first assessment. World Health Organization and the United Nations Environmental Programme
Vuorio K, Lepistö L, Holopainen AL (2007) Intercalibrations of freshwater phytoplankton analysis. Boreal Environ Res 12:561–569
Watson SB, McCauley E, Downing J (1997) Patterns in phytoplankton taxonomic composition across temperate lakes of differing nutrient status. Limnol Oceanogr 42:486–495
Willén E (2000) Phytoplankton in water quality assessment—an indicator concept. In: Heinonen P, Ziglio G, Van Der Beken A (eds) Hydrological and limonological aspects of lake monitoring. Wiley, New York
Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida
Acknowledgements
We thank Jannicke Moe and Gunner Severinsen for help with the REBECCA database, and the three reviewers for their constructive comments to earlier versions of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ptacnik, R., Lepistö, L., Willén, E. et al. Quantitative responses of lake phytoplankton to eutrophication in Northern Europe. Aquat Ecol 42, 227–236 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-008-9181-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-008-9181-z