Skip to main content
Log in

Confrontation of the Cybernetic Definition of a Living Individual with the Real World

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cybernetic definition of a living individual proposed previously (Korzeniewski, 2001) is very abstract and therefore describes the essence of life in a very formal and general way. In the present article this definition is reformulated in order to determine clearly the relation between life in general and a living individual in particular, and it is further explained and defended. Next, the cybernetic definition of a living individual is confronted with the real world. It is demonstrated that numerous restrictions imposed on the cybernetic definition of life by physical reality imply a number of particular properties of life that characterize present life on Earth, namely: (1) a living individual must be a dissipative structure (and therefore a low-entropy thermodynamic system out of the state of equilibrium); (2) spontaneously-originated life must be based on organic compounds; (3) evolutionarily stable self-dependent, free-living individuals must have some minimal level of complexity of structure and function; (4) a living individual must have a record of identity separated from an executive machinery; (5) the identity of living individuals must mutate and may evolve; (6) living individuals may collect and accumulate information in subsequent generations over very long periods of time; (7) the degree of complexity of a living individual reflects the degree of complexity of its environment (ecological niche) and (8) living individuals are capable of supple adaptation to varying environmental conditions. Thus, the cybernetic definition of a living individual, when confronted with the real physical world, generates most of the general properties of the present life on Earth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adami, C. (1998). Introduction to Artificial Life. Springer, Santa Clara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adami, C. (2002). What is complexity? BioEssays 24: 1085–1094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W.R. (1958). Requisite variety and implications for control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1: 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W.R. (1962). Introduction to Cybernetics. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau, M.A. (1998) Four puzzles about life. Artificial Life 4: 125–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. and E.O. Wiley (1986). Evolution as Entropy. Toward a Unified Theory of Biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabretta, R., S. Nolfi, D. Parisi, and G.P. Wagner (2000). Duplication of modules facilitates the evolution of functional specialization. Artificial Life 6: 69–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crutchfield, J.P. and K. Young (1989). Inferring statistical complexity. Physical Review Letters 63: 105–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cryer, P. E. (1991). Regulation of glucose metabolism in man. Journal of Internal Medicine Supplement 735: 31–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, M. and P. Schuster (1979). The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural Self-Organization. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, C. (1997). Aspects of complexity in life and science. Philosophica 59: 41–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gánti, T. (1975). Organisation of chemical reactions into dividing and metabolizing units: The chemotons. BioSystems 7: 189–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer, J. (2000). The units of evolutionary transition. Selection 1: 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P. (2001). Environmental complexity and the evolution of cognition. In: Sternberg, R. and J. Kaufman (Eds.). The evolution of intelligence. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum: 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1994). The evolution of life on Earth. Scientific American 271 (4): 62–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heylighen, F. (1996). The growth of structural and functional complexity during evolution. In: Heylighen, F. and D. Aerts (Eds.). The evolution of complexity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J. (1997). Biosemiotics: Towards a new synthesis in biology. European Journal for Semiotic Studies 9: 355–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokkanen, J.E. (1999). Visual simulations, artificial animals and virtual ecosystems. Journal of Experimental Biology 202: 3477–3484.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keymeulen, D., M. Iwata, Y. Kunioshi and T. Higuchi (1998). Online evolution for a self-adopting robotic navigation system using evoluable hardware. Artificial Life 4: 359–393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korzeniewski, B. (2001). Cybernetic formulation of the definition of life. Journal of Theoretical Biology 209: 275–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lem, S. (1973). The Invincible. The Seabury Press, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, H. and J.B. Pollack (2000). Automatic design and manufacture of robotic life forms. Nature 406: 974–978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E. (1988). The structure and confirmation of evolutionary theory. Greenwood Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. (1979). Gaia, A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1970). Time in the evolutionary process. Studium Generale 23: 266–272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. and E. Szathmary (1995). The Major Transitions in Evolution. W. H. Freeman, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShea, D.W. (1991). Complexity and evolution: What everybody knows. Biology and Philosophy 6: 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miglino, O., H.H. Lund and S. Nolfi (1995). Evolving mobile robots in simulated and real environments. Artificial Life 2: 417–434.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H.J. (1935). Life. Science 121: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H.J. (1966). The gene material as the initiator and organizing basis of life. American Naturalist 100: 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S. (1985). The Ontogeny of Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, W.T. (1973). Behaviour: The Control of Perception. Adline, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1980). From Being to Becoming. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, T.S. (1991). An approach to the synthesis of life. In: Langton, C.G., Taylor, C., Farmer, J.D. and Rasmussen, S. (Eds.), Artificial Life II: Proceedings of an interdisciplinary workshop on the synthesis and stimulation of living systems. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences and Complexity, Vol. 10, pp. 371–408. Reading, Addison–Wesley.

  • Shannon, C. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E. (1992). What is Life? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, H., N. Ono and K. Yuta (2003). Several necessary conditions for the evolution of complex form of life in an artificial environment. Artificial Life 9: 153–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Umbarger, H. E. (1978). Amino acid biosynthesis and its regulation. Annual Review of Biochemistry 47: 533–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Korzeniewski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korzeniewski, B. Confrontation of the Cybernetic Definition of a Living Individual with the Real World. Acta Biotheor 53, 1–28 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-005-7000-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-005-7000-7

Key Words