Abstract
Colorectal surgery is a specialized branch of surgery that involves the diagnosis and treatment of conditions affecting the colon, rectum, and anus. In the recent years, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has gained considerable interest in various medical specialties, including surgery. Chatbot Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), an AI-based chatbot developed by OpenAI, has shown great potential in improving the quality of healthcare delivery by providing accurate and timely information to both patients and healthcare professionals. In this paper, we investigate the potential application of ChatGPT in colorectal surgery. We also discuss the potential advantages and challenges associated with the implementation of ChatGPT in the surgical setting. Furthermore, we address the socio-ethical implications of utilizing ChatGPT in healthcare. This includes concerns over patient privacy, liability, and the potential impact on the doctor-patient relationship. Our findings suggest that ChatGPT has the potential to revolutionize the field of colorectal surgery by providing personalized and precise medical information, reducing errors and complications, and improving patient outcomes.
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- AI:
-
Artificial Intelligence
- ChatGPT:
-
Chatbot Generative Pre-Trained Transformer
- USMLE:
-
The United States Medical Licensing Examination
- ASCRS:
-
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons
- ESCP:
-
The European Society of Coloproctology
References
Abdullah M., A. Madain and Y. Jararweh. ChatGPT: Fundamentals, Applications and Social Impacts. In: 2022 Ninth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS)2022, p. 1–8.
Alberts, I. L., L. Mercolli, T. Pyka, G. Prenosil, K. Shi, A. Rominger, and A. Afshar-Oromieh. Large language models (LLM) and ChatGPT: what will the impact on nuclear medicine be? Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 50:1549–1552, 2023.
Ashebir, D. Z., and H. A. Gebreselassie. Pattern and Outcome of Colorectal and Perianal Surgery in a Referral Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiopian J. Health Sci. 31:985–992, 2021.
Cascella, M., J. Montomoli, V. Bellini, and E. Bignami. Evaluating the Feasibility of ChatGPT in Healthcare: An Analysis of Multiple Clinical and Research Scenarios. J. Med. Syst. 47:33, 2023.
Corman, M. L., and M. L. Corman. Colon and rectal surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
Ge, J., and J. C. Lai. Artificial intelligence-based text generators in hepatology: ChatGPT is just the beginning. Hepatol. Commun. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000097.
Grünebaum, A., J. Chervenak, S. L. Pollet, A. Katz, and F. A. Chervenak. The exciting potential for ChatGPT in obstetrics and gynecology. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.009.
İn, E., A. A. Geçkil, G. Kavuran, M. Şahin, N. K. Berber, and M. Kuluöztürk. Using artificial intelligence to improve the diagnostic efficiency of pulmonologists in differentiating COVID-19 pneumonia from community-acquired pneumonia. J. Med. Virol. 94:3698–3705, 2022.
Lecler, A., L. Duron, and P. Soyer. Revolutionizing radiology with GPT-based models: Current applications, future possibilities and limitations of ChatGPT. Diagn. Interv. Imaging. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2023.02.003.
Lee, P., S. Bubeck, and J. Petro. Benefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 388:1233–1239, 2023.
Li, R., W. Zhang, and Q. Li. Modified Pancreatojejunostomy in Pancreaticoduodenectomy for the Treatment of Periampullary Tumor: 8 Years of Surgical Experience. Med. Sci. Monitor: Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 25:3788–3795, 2019.
Lund, B. D., T. Wang, N. R. Mannuru, B. Nie, S. Shimray, and Z. Wang. ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence-written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. J. Assoc. Info. Sci. Technol. 74:570–581, 2023.
Mann, D. L. Artificial Intelligence Discusses the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Translational Medicine: A JACC: Basic to Translational Science Interview With ChatGPT. JACC: Basic Transl. Sci. 8:221–223, 2023.
Rajpurkar, P., E. Chen, O. Banerjee, and E. J. Topol. AI in health and medicine. Nat. Med. 28:31–38, 2022.
Salvagno, M., F. S. Taccone, and A. G. Gerli. Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Critical Care (London, England). 27:75, 2023.
Sanderson, K. GPT-4 is here: what scientists think. Nature. 615:773, 2023.
Sng, G. G. R., J. Y. M. Tung, D. Y. Z. Lim, and Y. M. Bee. Potential and Pitfalls of ChatGPT and Natural-Language Artificial Intelligence Models for Diabetes Education. Diabetes Care. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-0197.
Vu, J. V., B. C. George, M. Clark, S. J. Rivard, S. E. Regenbogen, and G. Kwakye. Readiness of Graduating General Surgery Residents to Perform Colorectal Procedures. J. Surg. Educ. 78:1127–1135, 2021.
Will ChatGPT transform healthcare? Nat. Med. 29: 505–506, 2023.
Willemink, M. J., W. A. Koszek, C. Hardell, J. Wu, D. Fleischmann, H. Harvey, L. R. Folio, R. M. Summers, D. L. Rubin, and M. P. Lungren. Preparing Medical Imaging Data for Machine Learning. Radiology. 295:4, 2020.
Yin, Z., C. Yao, L. Zhang, and S. Qi. Application of artificial intelligence in diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer: A novel Prospect. Front. Med. 10:1128084, 2023.
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges that Supplemental Digital Contents of this article were generated by ChatGPT (powered by OpenAI’s language model GPT-3.5; http://openai.com). Editing was done by the authors.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WL contributed to conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, and writing—original draft; YZ contributed to conceptualization, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, resources, and investigation; FC contributed to conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, resources, and investigation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical Approval
This study does not include any individual-level data and thus does not require any ethical approval.
Additional information
Associate Editor Stefan M. Duma oversaw the review of this article.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, W., Zhang, Y. & Chen, F. ChatGPT in Colorectal Surgery: A Promising Tool or a Passing Fad?. Ann Biomed Eng 51, 1892–1897 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03232-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03232-y