Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Equestrian Helmet Standards: Do They Represent Real-World Accident Conditions?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of helmets in equestrian sports has reduced the occurrence of traumatic brain injuries although, despite improvements to helmets, concussion remains a common injury. Currently, equestrian helmets are designed to pass certification standards involving a linear drop test to a rigid surface, while most concussions in equestrian sports result from oblique impacts to a compliant surface. The purpose of this study was to: (1) Compare the head kinematics and brain tissue response of the current equestrian helmet standard (EN1) and proposed standard EN13087-11 (EN2) to those associated with reconstructions of real-world equestrian concussion accidents. (2) Design a test protocol that would reflect the real-world conditions associated with concussion in equestrian sports. (3) To assess the protective capacity of an equestrian helmet using the flat turf and 45° turf proposed test protocols. Results for reconstructions of real-world concussions were obtained from a previous study (Clark et al. in J. Sci. Med. Sport 23:222–236, 2020). Using one jockey helmet model, impact tests were conducted according to the EN1 and EN2 protocols. Additionally, helmeted and unhelmeted tests were conducted at 5.9 and 6.0 m/s on to flat turf and 45° turf anvils for front, front-boss and rear-boss impact locations. The results demonstrated EN1 and EN2 both had higher magnitude accelerations and shorter duration impacts than reconstructed real-world concussive impacts. Impacts to turf anvils, on the other hand, produced similar head kinematics compared to the reconstructed real-world concussive impacts. Additionally, this study demonstrated that helmeted impacts significantly decreased rotational kinematics and brain tissue response below what is associated with unhelmeted impacts for oblique falls. However, the head kinematics and brain tissue response associated with these helmeted falls were consistent with concussion, suggesting that scope exists to improve the capacity of equestrian helmets to protect against concussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amoros, E., M. Chiron, J.-L. Martin, B. Thélot, and B. Laumon. Bicycle helmet wearing and the risk of head, face, and neck injury: a French case–control study based on a road trauma registry. Inj. Prev. 18:27–32, 2012.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bain, A. C., and D. F. Meaney. Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system white matter injury. J. Biomech. Eng. 122:615–622, 2000.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandak, F. A. On the mechanics of impact neurotrauma: a review and critical synthesis. J. Neurotrauma 12:635–649, 1995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandak, F. A., and R. H. Eppinger. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the human brain under combined rotational and translational accelerations. J. Passeng. Cars 103:1708–1726, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bland, M. L., C. McNally, and S. Rowson. Differences in impact performance of bicycle helmets during oblique impacts. J. Biomech. Eng. 140:091005, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bourdet, N., C. Deck, R. P. Carreira, and R. Willinger. Head impact conditions in the case of cyclist falls. Proc. IMechE Part P 226:282–289, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brighton, J. L., and R. J. Godwin. Ground assessment. In: United States Patent., United States, 2006.

  8. Clark, J. M. In-depth analysis and reconstruction of equestrian jockey accidents and their helmets. PhD Thesis, University College Dublin, Ireland, 2019.

  9. Clark, J. M., K. Adanty, A. Post, T. B. Hoshizaki, J. Clissold, A. McGoldrick, J. Hill, A. Ní Annaidh, and M. D. Gilchrist. Proposed injury thresholds for concussion in equestrian sports. J. Sci. Med. Sport 23:222–236, 2020.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark, J. M., T. A. Connor, A. Post, T. B. Hoshizaki, A. Ní Annaidh, and M. D. Gilchrist. Could a compliant foam anvil characterise the biofidelic impact response of equestrian helmets? J. Biomech. Eng. 142:061006, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clark, J. M., T. A. Connor, C. Williams, J. Clissold, A. McGoldrick, J. Hill, A. Ní Annaidh, and M. D. Gilchrist. Analysis of helmet damage and associated head injuries arising from real-world equestrian fall accidents. ASTM J. Test. Eval. 48:2185–2195, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, J. M., T. B. Hoshizaki, and M. D. Gilchrist. Protective capacity of an ice hockey goaltender helmet for three events associated with concussion. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 20:1299–1311, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clark, J. M., A. Post, T. A. Connor, T. B. Hoshizaki, and M. D. Gilchrist. Effect of impact surface on equestrian falls. ISBS Conference. Tsukuba, Japan 1:395–398, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clark, J. M., A. Post, T. B. Hoshizaki, and M. D. Gilchrist. Protective capacity of ice hockey helmets against different impact events. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 44:3693–3704, 2016.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Connor, T. A., J. M. Clark, J. Jayamohan, M. Stewart, A. McGoldrick, C. Williams, B. Seemungal, R. Smith, R. Burek, and M. D. Gilchrist. Do equestrian helmets prevent concussion? A retrospective analysis of head injuries and helmet damage from real-world equestrian accidents. Sports Med. Open 5:1–8, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cui, L., M. A. Forero Rueda, and M. D. Gilchrist. Optimisation of energy absorbing liner for equestrian helmets. Part II: Functionally graded foam liner. Mater. Des. 30:3414–3419, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cusimano, M. D., N. Cho, K. Amin, M. Shirazi, S. R. McFaull, M. T. Do, M. C. Wong, and K. Russell. Mechanisms of team-sport-related brain injuries in children 5 to 19 years old: opportunities for prevention. PLoS ONE 8:e58868, 2013.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Daneshvar, D. H., C. J. Nowinski, A. C. McKee, and R. C. Cantu. The epidemiology of sport-related concussion. Clin. Sports Med. 30:1–17, 2011.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Doorly, M. C. Investigations into head injury criteria using numerical reconstruction of real life accident cases. PhD Thesis, University College Dublin, Ireland 2007.

  20. Doorly, M. C., and M. D. Gilchrist. The use of accident reconstruction for the analysis of traumatic brain injury due to head impacts arising from falls. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 9:371–377, 2006.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. EN 1077. Helmets for alpine skiers and snowboarders. European CE standards 2007.

  22. EN 1078. Helmets for pedal cyclists and for users of skateboards and roller skates. British Standards Institution, London, 1997.

  23. EN 1384. Helmets for equestrian activities. British Standards Institution: European CE Standards, 2016.

  24. Forero Rueda, M. A., L. Cui, and M. D. Gilchrist. Optimisation of energy absorbing liner for equestrian helmets. Part I: Layered foam liner. Mater. Des. 30:3405–3413, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Forero Rueda, M. A., W. L. Halley, and M. D. Gilchrist. Fall and injury incidence rates of jockeys while racing in Ireland, France and Britain. Injury 41:533–539, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Forero Rueda, M. A., and M. D. Gilchrist. Racetrack turf impact measurements for jockey head injury risk analysis. STARSS Conference. Loughborough, 2007.

  27. Fréchède, B., and A. S. McIntosh. Numerical reconstruction of real-life concussive football impacts. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 41:390–398, 2009.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Giordano, C., and S. Kleiven. Evaluation of axonal strain as a predictor for mild traumatic brain injuries using finite element modeling. Stapp Car Crash J. 58:29, 2014.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Halldin, P. Proposal for a new test method measuring the head kinematics in angled helmeted impacts. Work on CEN TC158-WG11, 2015.

  30. Halldin, P., A. Gilchrist, and N. Mills. A new oblique impact test for motorcycle helmets. Int. J. Crashworthiness 6:53–64, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hardy, W. N., C. D. Foster, M. J. Mason, K. H. Yang, A. I. King, and S. Tashman. Investigation of head injury mechanisms using neutral density technology and high-speed biplanar X-ray. Stapp Car Crash J. 45:337–368, 2001.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Horgan, T. J., and M. D. Gilchrist. The creation of three-dimensional finite element models for simulating head impact biomechanics. Int. J. Crashworthiness 8:353–366, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Horgan, T. J., and M. D. Gilchrist. Influence of FE model variability in predicting brain motion and intracranial pressure changes in head impact simulations. Int. J. Crashworthiness 9:401–418, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hoshizaki, T. B., A. Post, M. Kendall, J. Cournoyer, P. Rousseau, M. D. Gilchrist, S. Brien, M. Cusimano, and S. Marshall. The development of a threshold curve for the understanding of concussion in sport. Trauma 19:196–206, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hoshizaki, T. B., A. Post, R. A. Oeur, and S. E. Brien. Current and future concepts in helmet and sports injury prevention. Neurosurgery 75:S136–S148, 2014.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hubbard, R. P., and D. G. McLeod. Definition and development of a crash dummy head. SAE Technical Paper 741193, 1974.

  37. Hutchison, M. G., P. Comper, W. H. Meeuwisse, and R. J. Echemendia. A systematic video analysis of National Hockey League (NHL) concussions, part I: who, when, where and what? Brit. J. Sports Med. 49:547–551, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kimpara, H., and M. Iwamoto. Mild traumatic brain injury predictors based on angular accelerations during impacts. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40:114–126, 2012.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kleiven, S. Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions. Stapp Car Crash J. 51:81–114, 2007.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kleiven, S., and H. von Holst. Consequences of brain size following impact in prediction of subdural hematoma evaluated with numerical techniques. IRCOBI Conference. Isle of Man, United Kingdom: International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury, 2001.

  41. McIntosh, A. S., D. A. Patton, B. Fréchède, P.-A. Pierré, E. Ferry, and T. Barthels. The biomechanics of concussion in unhelmeted football players in Australia: a case–control study. BMJ Open 4:e005078, 2014.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Mills, N., and M. Whitlock. Performance of horse-riding helmets in frontal and side impacts. Injury 20:189–192, 1989.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nahum, A. M., R. Smith, and C. C. Ward. Intracranial pressure dynamics during head impact. 21st Stapp Car Crash Conf. Warrendale, PA: SAE Technical Paper, 1977.

  44. Oeur, R. A., M. D. Gilchrist, and T. B. Hoshizaki. Interaction of impact parameters for simulated falls in sport using three different sized Hybrid III headforms. Int. J. Crashworthiness 24:326–335, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Pang, T., K. Thai, A. McIntosh, R. Grzebieta, E. Schilter, R. Dal Nevo, and G. Rechnitzer. Head and neck responses in oblique motorcycle helmet impacts: a novel laboratory test method. Int. J. Crashworthiness 16:297–307, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  46. PAS015. Helmets for equestrian use. Brisish Standards Institution 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Patton, D. A., A. S. McIntosh, and S. Kleiven. The biomechanical determinants of concussion: finite element simulations to investigate tissue-level predictors of injury during sporting impacts to the unprotected head. J. Appl. Biomech. 31:264–268, 2015.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Post, A., J. M. Clark, D. Robertson, T. B. Hoshizaki, and M. D. Gilchrist. The effect of acceleration signal processing for head impact numeric simulations. Sports Eng. 20:111–119, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Post, A., T. B. Hoshizaki, M. D. Gilchrist, S. Brien, M. D. Cusimano, and S. Marshall. The influence of dynamic response and brain deformation metrics on the occurrence of subdural hematoma in different regions of the brain: laboratory investigation. J. Neurosurg. 120:453–461, 2014.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Post, A., T. B. Hoshizaki, M. D. Gilchrist, S. Brien, M. Cusimano, and S. Marshall. Traumatic brain injuries: the influence of the direction of impact. Neurosurgery 76:81–91, 2015.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Post, A., T. B. Hoshizaki, C. Karton, J. M. Clark, L. Dawson, J. Cournoyer, K. Taylor, R. A. Oeur, M. D. Gilchrist, and M. D. Cusimano. The biomechanics of concussion for ice hockey head impact events. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 22:631–643, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Post, A., D. Koncan, M. Kendall, J. Cournoyer, J. M. Clark, G. Kosiwka, W. Chen, A. de Grau, and T. B. Hoshizaki. Analysis of speed accuracy using video analysis software. Sports Eng. 21:235–241, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Post, A., A. Oeur, B. Hoshizaki, and M. D. Gilchrist. An examination of American football helmets using brain deformation metrics associated with concussion. Mater. Des. 45:653–662, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Post, A., A. Oeur, B. Hoshizaki, and M. D. Gilchrist. Examination of the relationship between peak linear and angular accelerations to brain deformation metrics in hockey helmet impacts. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 16:511–519, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Post, A., A. Oeur, E. Walsh, T. B. Hoshizaki, and M. D. Gilchrist. A centric/non-centric impact protocol and finite element model methodology for the evaluation of American football helmets to evaluate rish of concussion. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 17:1785–1800, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ruan, J. S. Impact biomechanics of head injury by mathematical modeling. PhD Thesis, Wayne State University, USA, 1994.

  57. Snell, M. For use with motorcycles and other motorized vehicles. North Highlands: Snell Memorial Foundation, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Trosseille, X., C. Tarriere, F. Lavaste, F. Guillon, and A. Domont. Development of a FEM of the human head according to a specific test protocol. SAE Technical Paper, 1992.

  59. Turner, M., P. McCrory, and W. Halley. Injuries in professional horse racing in Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland during 1992–2000. Brit. J. Sports Med. 36:403–409, 2002.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Van Lierde, C. Biomechanics of head injury. Damage criteria for skull and brain lesions. PhD Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, 2005.

  61. Willinger, R., L. Taleb, and C. Kopp. Modal and temporal analysis of head mathematical models. J. Neurotrauma 12:743–754, 1995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Yoganandan, N., J. Humm, M. Schlick, and F. Pintar. Head motions using nine accelerometer package and angular rate sensors. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 44:256–261, 2008.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Yu, Z., B. S. Elkin, and B. Morrison. Modeling traumatic brain injury in vitro: Functional changes in the absence of cell death. Biomed. Sci. & Engng Conf. IEEE, 2009.

  64. Zhang, L., K. H. Yang, R. Dwarampudi, K. Omori, T. Li, K. Chang, W. N. Hardy, T. B. Khalil, and A. I. King. Recent advances in brain injury research: a new human head model development and validation. Stapp Car Crash J. 45:369–394, 2001.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang, L., K. H. Yang, and A. I. King. A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. J. Biomech. Eng. 126:226–236, 2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhou, C., T. B. Khalil, and A. I. King. A new model comparing impact responses of the homogeneous and inhomogeneous human brain. 39th Stapp Car Crash Conf. SAE Technical Paper 1:121–137, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 642662. Helmets were supplied by Charles Owen.

Author information

Author notes

  1. J. Michio Clark

    Present address: Vector Scientific Inc., Golden, CO, 80403, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

    J. Michio Clark, Aisling Ní Annaidh & Michael D. Gilchrist

  2. Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    T. Blaine Hoshizaki & Michael D. Gilchrist

Authors
  1. J. Michio Clark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Blaine Hoshizaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aisling Ní Annaidh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael D. Gilchrist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Gilchrist.

Additional information

Associate Editor Stefan M. Duma oversaw the review of this article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables A1, A2 and Figs. A1, A2, A3, A4.

Table A1 Accident descriptions and impact parameters for each concussive case reconstructed by Clark et al.9
Full size table
Table A2 Mean reconstruction results (±1 standard deviation) for each concussive case reconstructed by Clark et al.9
Full size table
Figure A1
figure 11

Sample resultant linear and rotational acceleration time-histories for current equestrian helmet standard EN1384:2016 (EN1) impacts.

Full size image
Figure A2
figure 12

Sample resultant linear and rotational acceleration time-histories for proposed standard EN13087-11 (EN2) impacts.

Full size image
Figure A3
figure 13

Sample resultant linear and rotational acceleration time-histories for flat turf anvil impacts.

Full size image
Figure A4
figure 14

Sample resultant linear and rotational acceleration time-histories for 45° turf anvil impacts.

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clark, J.M., Hoshizaki, T.B., Annaidh, A.N. et al. Equestrian Helmet Standards: Do They Represent Real-World Accident Conditions?. Ann Biomed Eng 48, 2247–2267 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02531-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02531-y

Keywords