Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Silica-Based Nanomaterials and Their Derivate with PEGylation on Cementoblasts

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 26 September 2014

Abstract

The applications of silica-based nanomaterials in dental fields as multifunctional scaffolds and carriers have been widely documented in recent years. However, toxicity of this type of nanoparticles in dental cells has not been elucidated in detail. The aim of present study was to investigate the effects of naked and PEGylated silica nanoparticles on cementoblasts. Methods including MTT assay, apoptosis, LDH, as well as ROS analysis were introduced in our study. Moreover, ALP analysis and alizarin red staining were additionally performed to indicate the influence of SiO2 and PEG-SiO2 on cementoblast differentiation. Results obtained from our designs and experiments demonstrated that naked silica nanoparticles could induce more cell toxicity than PEG-SiO2 nanoparticles, indicating PEGylation could efficiently reduce in vitro toxicity from several sections including ROS, LDH, and other important routes. Based on above results, we concluded that it was so necessary to process PEGylation while silica-based materials were applied in biomedicine and related fields including dental area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PEG:

Polyethylene glycol

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

References

  1. Ali Khan A, Mudassir J, Mohtar N, et al. Advanced drug delivery to the lymphatic system: lipid-based nanoformulations. Int J Nanomedicine. 8: 2733-44, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bao, X., Y. Liu, G. Han, et al. The effect on proliferation and differentiation of cementoblast by using sclerostin as inhibitor. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14:21140–21152, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bitar, A., N. M. Ahmad, H. Fessi, et al. Silica-based nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Drug Discov. Today 17:1147–1154, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, M. C., F. L. Mi, Z. X. Liao, et al. Recent advances in chitosan-based nanoparticles for oral delivery of macromolecules. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65:865–879, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, L. C., X. Jiang, J. Wang, et al. Nano-bio effects: interaction of nanomaterials with cells. Nanoscale 5:3547–3569, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. D’errico, J. A., J. E. Berry, H. Ouyang, et al. Employing a transgenic animal model to obtain cementoblasts in vitro. J. Periodontol. 71:63–72, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Duan, J., Y. Yu, Y. Li, et al. Toxic effect of silica nanoparticles on endothelial cells through DNA damage response via Chk1-dependent G2/M checkpoint. PLoS ONE 8:e62087, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang, J., T. Seki, and H. Maeda. Therapeutic strategies by modulating oxygen stress in cancer and inflammation. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 61:290–302, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaganathan, H., and B. Godin. Biocompatibility assessment of si-based nano- and micro-particles. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 64:1800–1819, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuthati, Y., P. J. Sung, C. F. Weng, et al. Functionalization of mesoporous silica nanoparticles for targeting, biocompatibility, combined cancer therapies and theragnosis. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 13:2399–2430, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Le Dévédec, F., S. Strandman, P. Hildgen, et al. PEGylated bile acids for use in drug delivery systems: enhanced solubility and bioavailability of itraconazole. Mol. Pharm. 10:3057–3066, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewinski, N., V. Colvin, and R. Drezek. Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Small 4:26–49, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, Y., L. Sun, M. Jin, et al. Size dependent cytotoxicity of amorphous silica nanoparticles in human hepatoma HepG2 cells. Toxicol. In Vitro 25:1343–1352, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lino, M. M., C. S. Paulo, A. C. Vale, et al. Antifungal activity of dental resins containing amphotericin B-conjugated nanoparticles. Dent. Mater. 29:e252–e262, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mamaeva, V., C. Sahlgren, and M. Lindén. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in medicine—recent advances. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65:689–702, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Napierska, D., L. C. Thomassen, D. Lison, et al. The nanosilica hazard: another variable entity. Part Fibre Toxicol. 7:39, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Oguri, T., Y. Tamaki, Y. Hotta, et al. Effects of a convenient silica-coating treatment on shear bond strengths of porcelain veneers on zirconia-based ceramics. Dent. Mater. J. 31:788–796, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roy, R., S. Kumar, A. Tripathi, et al. Interactive threats of nanoparticles to the biological system. Immunol. Lett., 2013 [Epub ahead of print].

  19. Shang, Y., T. Zhu, Y. Li, et al. Size-dependent hydroxyl radicals generation induced by SiO2 ultra-fine particles: the role of surface iron. Sci China Ser. B 52:1033–1041, 2009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, A. M., H. Duan, A. M. Mohs, et al. Bioconjugated quantum dots for in vivo molecular and cellular imaging. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60:1226–1240, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Stöber, W., A. Fink, and E. Bohn. Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 26:62–69, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang, F., L. Li, and D. Chen. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles: synthesis, biocompatibility and drug delivery. Adv. Mater. 24:1504–1534, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Valko, M., D. Leibfritz, J. Moncol, et al. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 39:44–84, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilczewska, A. Z., K. Niemirowicz, K. H. Markiewicz, et al. Nanoparticles as drug delivery systems. Pharmacol Rep. 64:1020–1037, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu, X., M. Wu, and J. X. Zhao. Recent development of silica nanoparticles as delivery vectors for cancer imaging and therapy. Nanomedicine, 2013 [Epub ahead of print].

  26. Yang, Y. X., Z. M. Song, B. Cheng, et al. Evaluation of the toxicity of food additive silica nanoparticles on gastrointestinal cells. J. Appl. Toxicol., 2013 [Epub ahead of print].

Download references

Acknowledgments

Cementoblast cell line (OCCM-30) was obtained as a gift from Prof. Somerman in University of Washington. Otherwise, we also thanked for their assistance in cell experiments. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, NSFC 81170999; Foundation from Department of Health of Jilin Province, China, 2011Z071; and Specialized Research Fund for Doctoral Program of Higher Education, China, SRFDP 20110061110072.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Hu.

Additional information

Associate Editor K. A. Athanasiou oversaw the review of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bao, X., Wei, X., Wang, Y. et al. Effect of Silica-Based Nanomaterials and Their Derivate with PEGylation on Cementoblasts. Ann Biomed Eng 42, 1781–1789 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1012-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1012-x

Keywords

Navigation