Abstract
Biomechanical studies on abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) seek to provide for better decision criteria to undergo surgical intervention for AAA repair. More accurate results can be obtained by using appropriate material models for the tissues along with accurate geometric models and more realistic boundary conditions for the lesion. However, patient-specific AAA models are generated from gated medical images in which the artery is under pressure. Therefore, identification of the AAA zero pressure geometry would allow for a more realistic estimate of the aneurysmal wall mechanics. This study proposes a novel iterative algorithm to find the zero pressure geometry of patient-specific AAA models. The methodology allows considering the anisotropic hyperelastic behavior of the aortic wall, its thickness and accounts for the presence of the intraluminal thrombus. Results on 12 patient-specific AAA geometric models indicate that the procedure is computational tractable and efficient, and preserves the global volume of the model. In addition, a comparison of the peak wall stress computed with the zero pressure and CT-based geometries during systole indicates that computations using CT-based geometric models underestimate the peak wall stress by 59 ± 64 and 47 ± 64 kPa for the isotropic and anisotropic material models of the arterial wall, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alastrué, V., A. García, E. Peña, J. F. Rodríguez, M. Martínez, and M. Doblaré. Numerical framework for patient-specific computational modelling of vascular tissue. Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 6:1–30, 2006.
Auer, M., and T. C. Gasser. Reconstruction and finite element mesh generation of abdominal aortic aneurysms from computerized tomography angiography data with minimal user interactions. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29(4):1022–1028, 2010.
Brown, L. C., and J. L. Powell. Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance. UK small aneurysm trial participants. Ann. Surg. 230(3):289–296, 1999; discussion 296–297.
Carlson, D. E. Inverse deformation results for elastic materials. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 20(2):261–263, 1969.
Chadwick, P. Application of an energy-momentum tensor in elastostatics. J. Elasticity 5:249–258, 1975.
de Putter, S., B. J. B. M. Wolters, M. C. M. Ruttena, M. Breeuwer, F. A. Gerritsen, and F. N. van de Vosse. Patient-specific initial wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms with a backward incremental method. J. Biomech. 40:1081–1090, 2006.
Demiray, H. A note on the elasticity of soft biological tissues. J. Biomech. 5:309–311, 1972.
Di Martino, E. S., and D. A. Vorp. Effect of variation in intraluminal thrombus constitutive properties on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 31(7):804–809, 2003.
DiMartino, E. S., A. Bohra, J. P. Vande Geest, N. Y. Gupta, M. S. Makaroun, and D. A. Vorp. Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue. J. Vasc. Surg. 43:570–576, 2006.
Fillinger, M. F., S. P. Marra, M. L. Raghavan, and F. E. Kennedy. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. J. Vasc. Surg. 37(4):724–732, 2003.
Fillinger, M. F., M. L. Raghavan, S. P. Marra, J. L. Cronenwett, and F. E. Kennedy. In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. J. Vasc. Surg. 36(3):589–597, 2002.
Gasser, T. C. Bringing vascular biomechanics into clinical practice. Simulation-based decisions for elective abdominal aortic aneurysms repair. In: Patient-Specific Computational Modeling. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, edited by B. Calvo, and E. Pena. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.
Gasser, T. C., M. Auer, F. Labruto, J. Swedenborg, and J. Roy. Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: model complexity versus predictability of finite element simulations. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. 40:176–185, 2010.
Gasser, T. C., S. Gallinetti, X. Xing, C. Forsell, J. Swedenborg, and J. Roy. Spatial orientation of collagen fibers in the Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm’s wall and its relation to wall mechanics. Acta Biomater. 8(8):3091–3103, 2012.
Govindjee, S., and P. Mihalic. Computational methods for inverse finite elastostatics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. 136:47–57, 1996.
Govindjee, S., and P. Mihalic. Computational methods for inverse deformations in quasi-incompressible finite elasticity. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 43:821–838, 1998.
Hans, S. S., O. Jareunpoon, B. Balasubramaniam, and G. B. Zelenock. Size and location of thrombus in intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J. Vasc. Surg. 41:584–588, 2005.
Heng, M. S., M. J. Fagan, W. Collier, G. Desai, P. T. McCollum, and I. C. Chetter. Peak wall stress measurement in elective and acute abdominal aortic aneurysms. J. Vasc. Surg. 47:17–22, 2008.
Holzapfel, G. A. Nonlinear Solid Mechanics. A Continuum Approach for Engineering. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2000, 455 pp.
Karkos, C., U. Mukhopadhyay, I. Papakostas, J. Ghosh, G. Thomson, and R. Hughes. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: the role of clinical examination and opportunistic detection. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 19:299–303, 2000.
Kazi, M., J. Thyberg, P. Religa, J. Roy, P. Eriksson, U. Hedin, and J. Swedenborg. Influence of intraluminal thrombus on structural and cellular composition of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall. J. Vasc. Surg. 38(6):1283–1292, 2003.
Larsson, E., F. Labruto, T. C. Gasser, J. Swedenborg, and R. Hultgren. Analysis of aortic wall stress and rupture risk in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm with a gender perspective. J. Vasc. Surg. 54(2):295–299, 2011.
Limet, R., N. Sakalihassan, and A. Albert. Determination of the expansion rate and incidence of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J. Vasc. Surg. 14(4):540–548, 1991.
Lu, J., X. Zhou, and M. L. Raghavan. Inverse elastostatic stress analysis in pre-deformed biological structures: demonstration using abdominal aortic aneurysms. J. Biomech. 40:693–696, 2007.
Maier, A., M. W. Gee, C. Reeps, J. Pongratz, H. H. Eckstein, and W. A. Wall. A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38:3124–3134, 2010.
Martufi, G., E. S. Di Martino, C. H. Amon, S. C. Muluk, and E. A. Finol. Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: image-based wall thickness distribution. ASME J. Biomech. 131(6):061015, 2009.
Newman, A. B., A. M. Arnold, G. L. Burke, D. H. O’Leary, and T. A. Manolio. Cardiovascular disease and mortality in older adults with small abdominal aortic aneurysms detected by ultrasonography: the cardiovascular health study. Ann. Intern. Med. 134(3):182–190, 2001.
Powell, J. T., L. C. Brown, J. F. Forbes, F. G. Fowkes, R. M. Greenhalgh, C. V. Ruckley, and S. G. Thompson. Final 12-year follow-up of surgery versus surveillance in the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. Br. J. Surg. 94:702–708, 2007.
Raghavan, M. L., M. A. Baoshun, and M. F. Filinger. Non-invasive determination of zero-pressure geometry of arterial aneurysms. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 34(9):1414–1419, 2006.
Raghavan, M. L., J. Kratzberg, E. M. Castro de Tolosa, M. M. Hanaoka, P. Walker, and E. S. da Silva. Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J. Biomech. 39:3010–3016, 2006.
Raghavan, M. L., and D. A. Vorp. Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. J. Biomech. 33(4):475–482, 2000.
Rissland, P., Y. Alemu, J. Ricotta, and D. Blustein. Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model. ASME J. Biomech. 131(3):031001, 2009.
Rodriguez, J. F., G. Martufi, M. Doblare, and E. A. Finol. The effect of material model formulation in the stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 37(11):2218–2221, 2009.
Rodriguez, J. F., C. Ruiz, M. Doblaré, and G. Holzapfel. Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy. ASME J. Biomech. 130(2):021023, 2008.
Sakalihasan, N., R. Limet, and O. D. Defawe. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Lancet 365:1577–1589, 2005.
Shield, R. T. Inverse deformation results in finite elasticity. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 78:490–500, 1967.
Shum, J., E. S. Di Martino, A. Goldhammer, D. Goldman, L. Acker, G. Patel, J. H. Ng, G. Martufi, and E. A. Finol. Semi-automatic vessel wall detection and quantification of wall thickness in computed tomography images of human abdominal aortic aneurysms. Med. Phys. 37(2):638–648, 2010.
Shum, J., G. Martufi, E. S. Di Martino, C. B. Washington, J. Grisafi, S. C. Muluk, and E. A. Finol. Quantitative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39(1):277–286, 2011.
Shum, J., A. Xu, I. Chatnuntawech, and E. A. Finol. A Framework for the Automatic Generation of Surface Topologies for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Models. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39(1):249–259, 2011.
Speelman, L., E. M. Bosboom, G. W. Schurink, J. Buth, M. Breeuwer, M. J. Jacobs, and F. N. van de Vosse. Initial stress and nonlinear material behavior in patient-specific AAA wall stress analysis. J. Biomech. 42(11):1713–1719, 2009.
Thompson, S. G., H. A. Ashton, L. Gao, R. A. P. Scott, and Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study Group. Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study. Brit. Med. J. 338:2307, 2009.
Thubrikar, M. J., J. al-Soudi, and F. Robicsek. Wall stress studies of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a clinical model. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 15(3):355–366, 2001.
Truijers, M., J. A. Pol, L. J. Schultzekool, S. M. van Sterkenburg, M. F. Fillinger, and J. D. Blankensteijn. Wall stress analysis in small asymptomatic, symptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 33(4):401–407, 2007.
Vande Geest, J. P., M. S. Sacks, and D. A. Vorp. The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. J. Biomech. 39(7):1324–1334, 2006.
Venkatasubramaniam, A. K., M. J. Fagan, T. Mehta, K. J. Mylankal, B. Ray, G. Kuhan, I. C. Chetter, and P. T. McCollum. A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for rupture and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 28:168–176, 2004.
Vorp, D. A., M. L. Raghavan, and M. W. Webster. Wall stress studies of abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, and asymmetry. J. Vasc. Surg. 27:632–639, 1998.
Wang, D. H. J., M. S. Makaroun, M. W. Webster, and D. A. Vorp. Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J. Vasc. Surg. 36:598–604, 2002.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge research funding from project 071/UPB10/12 from the University of Zaragoza, and from NIH grants R21EB007651, R21EB008804 and R15HL087268. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Joan Greve oversaw the review of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riveros, F., Chandra, S., Finol, E.A. et al. A Pull-Back Algorithm to Determine the Unloaded Vascular Geometry in Anisotropic Hyperelastic AAA Passive Mechanics. Ann Biomed Eng 41, 694–708 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0712-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0712-3