Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical outcomes of reconstruction using the gastric tube and free jejunum for cervical esophageal cancer: analysis using the National Clinical Database of Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Esophagus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cervical esophageal cancer accounts for a small proportion of all esophageal cancers. Therefore, studies examining this cancer include a small patient cohort. Most patients with cervical esophageal cancer undergo reconstruction using a gastric tube or free jejunum after esophagectomy. We examined the current status of postoperative morbidity and mortality of cervical esophageal cancer based on big data.

Methods

Based on the Japan National Clinical Database, 807 surgically treated patients with cervical esophageal cancer were enrolled between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. Surgical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed for each reconstructed organ using gastric tubes and free jejunum.

Results

The incidence of postoperative complications related to reconstructed organs was higher in the gastric tube reconstruction (17.9%) than in the free jejunum (6.7%) for anastomotic leakage (p < 0.01), but not significantly different for reconstructed organ necrosis (0.4% and 0.3%, respectively). The incidence rates of overall morbidity, pneumonia, 30-day reoperation, tracheal necrosis, and 30-day mortality using these reconstruction methods were 64.7% and 59.7%, 16.7% and 11.1%, 9.3% and 11.4%, 2.2% and 1.6%, and 1.2% and 0.0%, respectively. Only pneumonia was more common in the gastric tube reconstruction group (p = 0.03), but was not significantly different for any other complication.

Conclusions

The incidence of overall morbidities and reoperation, especially anastomotic leakage after gastric tube reconstruction, suggested a necessity for further improvement. However, the incidence of fatal complications, such as tracheal necrosis or reconstructed organ necrosis, was low for both reconstruction methods, and the mortality rate was acceptable as a means of radical treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data supporting this study’s fndings are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Watanabe M, Tachimori Y, Oyama T, et al. Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2013. Esophagus. 2021;18:1–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ohashi S, Miyamoto S, Kikuchi O, et al. Recent advances from basic and clinical studies of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:1700–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 2. Esophagus. 2019;16:25–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tong DK, Law S, Kwong DL, et al. Current management of cervical esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2011;35:600–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cao CN, Luo JW, Gao L, et al. Primary radiotherapy compared with primary surgery in cervical esophageal cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140:918–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Takebayashi K, Tsubosa Y, Matsuda S, et al. Comparison of curative surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy as initial treatment for patients with cervical esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30:1–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozawa S, Tachimori Y, Baba H, et al. Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2001. Esophagus. 2009;6:95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakajima Y, Kawada K, Tokairin Y, et al. “Larynx-preserving surgery” for cervical esophageal carcinoma can preserve the vocal function and improve the clinical outcome. Esophagus. 2017;14:76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kato H, Kitagawa Y, Kuwano H, et al. Neo-adjuvant therapy or definitive chemoradiotherapy can improve laryngeal preservation rates in patients with cervical esophageal cancer. A Japanese nationwide survey. Esophagus. 2016;13:276–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hasegawa H, Takahashi A, Kakeji Y, et al. Surgical outcomes of gastroenterological surgery in Japan: report of the National Clinical Database 2011–2017. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019;3:426–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang HW, Chu PY, Kuo KT, et al. A reappraisal of surgical management for squamous cell carcinoma in the pharyngoesophageal junction. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:468–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Daiko H, Hayashi R, Saikawa M, et al. Surgical management of carcinoma of the cervical esophagus. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96:166–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Ozawa S, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer using a nationwide database in Japan. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1821–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Okamura A, Watanabe M, Kanamori J, et al. Digestive reconstruction after pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:695–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferahkose Z, Bedirli A, Kerem M, et al. Comparison of free jejunal graft with gastric pull-up reconstruction after resection of hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:340–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Miyamoto S, Sakuraba M, Nagamatsu S, et al. Salvage total pharyngolaryngectomy and free jejunum transfer. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:947–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mayanagi S, Onitsuka T, Nakagawa M, et al. The use of short segment free jejunal transfer as salvage surgery for cervical esophageal and hypopharyngeal cancer. World J Surg. 2014;38:144–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Committee for Scientific Affairs, The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery, Shimizu H, et al. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeries in Japan during 2018: annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;69:179–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoshida K, Tanaka Y, Imai T, et al. Subtotal stomach in esophageal reconstruction surgery achieves an anastomotic leakage rate of less than 1%. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020;4:422–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kikuchi H, Endo H, Yamamoto H, et al. Impact of reconstruction route on postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy: analysis of esophagectomies in the Japanese National Clinical Database. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021;6:46–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsubara T, Ueda M, Nakajima T, et al. Elongated stomach roll with vascular microanastomosis for reconstruction of the esophagus after pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:613–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morita M, Saeki H, Ito S, et al. Technical improvement of total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy for esophageal cancer and head and neck cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1671–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Okamura A, Watanabe M, Mukoyama N, et al. A nationwide survey on digestive reconstruction following pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022;6:54–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakajima Y, Tachimori H, Miyawaki Y, et al. A survey of the clinical outcomes of cervical esophageal carcinoma surgery focusing on the presence or absence of laryngectomy using the National Clinical Database in Japan. Esophagus. 2022;19:569–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Baba Y, Yoshida N, Shigaki H, et al. Prognostic impact of postoperative complications in 502 patients with surgically resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective single-institution study. Ann Surg. 2016;264:305–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kataoka K, Takeuchi H, Mizusawa J, et al. Prognostic impact of postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: exploratory analysis of JCOG9907. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1152–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank all participants of the NCD project for their great efforts in data registration. We thank Shinya Hirakawa, PhD, for his efforts in data management as a subanalyzer. We also thank Takeshi Naito, MD, PhD, and Kinji Kamiya, MD, PhD, for providing appropriate advice as supervisors as well as the working members of the database committee of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery and e Japan Esophageal Society. The authors wish to acknowledge Mr. Keita Shimoakasho of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery and Ms. Hitomi Okamoto, Ms. Natsumi Yamamoto, and Mr. Nariyoshi Butsuda of the NCD, Japan, for their valuable assistance with administration and database information.

Funding

This study was funded by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, National Clinical Database, Johnson and Johnson, Nipro, Intuitive Surgical, Fujifilm Corporation, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, Ono Pharmaceutical, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Covidien, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Kaken Pharmaceutical, Yakult Honsha, Tsumura and Company, Sumitomo Foundation, EA Pharma Co., Ltd., Eisai, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, MEDICON INC, Teijin Pharma, Shionogi, Ethicon, Olympus, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, MSD K.K., Smith and Nephew, ASKA Pharmaceutical, Miyarisan Pharmaceutical, Toray Industries, Daiichi-Sankyo and Nippon Kayaku.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yutaka Miyawaki.

Ethics declarations

Ethical statement

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. The study protocol was approved by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery and the Institutional Review Board of Edogawa Hospital (approval number 2020-19). The institutional review board waived the need for informed consent due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Conflict of interest

Author H.T. belongs to an endowed course funded by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and belongs to a department that accepts financial support from National Clinical Database, Johnson & Johnson K.K., Nipro Corporation and Intuitive Surgical Sàrl. The author received a research grant from FUJIFILM Corporation. Author H.M. is affiliated with a social collaboration department supported by grants from National Clinical Database, Johnson & Johnson K.K., Nipro Co., and Intuitive Surgical Sàrl, Author Y.Ki. received grants or contracts from ASAHI KASEI PHARMA CORPORATION, ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory Inc., Nippon Covidien Inc., TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., KAKEN PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., TSUMURA & CO., Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd., EA Pharma Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., MEDICON INC., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and TEIJIN PHARMA LIMITED. Author Y.Ki also received lecture fees, etc. from CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., ASAHI KASEI PHARMA CORPORATION, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory Inc., SHIONOGI & CO., LTD., Nippon Covidien Inc., Ethicon, Inc., ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Olympus Corporation, Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., AstraZeneca K.K., MSD K.K., Smith & Nephew KK., KAKEN PHARMACEUTICAL CO.,LTD., ASKA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., MIYARISAN PHARMACEUTICAL CO. LTD., Toray Industries, Inc., DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED, Chugai Foundation for Innovative Drug Discovery Science, Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., and EA Pharma Co., Ltd. Authors Y.M., Y.N., H.Sa., N.F., K.K., S.S., H.Sh., M.W., Y.Ka, and Y.D. declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miyawaki, Y., Tachimori, H., Nakajima, Y. et al. Surgical outcomes of reconstruction using the gastric tube and free jejunum for cervical esophageal cancer: analysis using the National Clinical Database of Japan. Esophagus 20, 427–434 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-023-00997-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-023-00997-y

Keywords

Navigation