Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Vesicovaginal fistulas: transperitoneal surgical repair using omentum or peritoneal tissue interposition, a summary of 35 years of experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Objective

To report the result of primary vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) repair using the transabdominal approach with omental or peritoneal flap interposition.

Methods

The study evaluated 38 patients who were treated with transabdominal approach with omental or peritoneal flap. The omental flap was used as the first choice if it was of sufficient length; otherwise, a peritoneal flap was created. Patients were followed postoperatively for 1 year and by telephone survey thereafter.

Results

The age of patients ranged from 29 to 68 years, with a median of 52 years. The main causes of VVF in this study cohort were hysterectomy for benign conditions (60.5 %), hysterectomy for malignant conditions (34.2 %), and radiation therapy (5.3 %). Peritoneal flap interposition was used in 6 patients and omental flap was used in 32 patients. All patients were continent following catheter removal. Overall, 89.5 % (34 out of 38) of fistulae were successfully repaired at first attempt. The success with omental flap interposition was 100 %. Recurrence of the fistula was reported in four patients (all with primary peritoneal flap interposition). Two of them were successfully cured by peritoneal flap re-interposition. While in two patients, with a history of radiation therapy, sigma rectum pouch was performed.

Conclusion

Transperitoneal surgical repair using omentum or peritoneal tissue interposition should be considered in the first attempt of repair of supratrigonal VVFs. However, successful repair depends on the experience of the surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh O, Gupta SS, Mathur RK. Urogental fistulas in women, 5-years experience at a single center. Urol J. 2010;7(1):35–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hilton P, Ward A. Epidemiological and surgical aspects of urogental fistulae: a review of 25 years experience in southeast Nigeria. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998;9(4):189–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith GL, Williams G. Vesicovaginal fistula. BJU Int. 1999;83(5):564–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Symond RE. Incontinance: vesical and urethral fistulas. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1984;27(2):499–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee RA, Symmond RE, Williom TJ. Current status of genitourinary fistula. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72(3 Pt 1):313–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hadzi-Djokic J, Pejcic TP, Acimovic M. Vesico-vaginal fistula: report of 220 cases. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41(2):299–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haferkamp A, Wagener N, Buse S, Reitz A, et al. Vesicovaginal fistulas. Urologe A. 2005;44(3):270–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eilber KS, Kavaler E, Rodriguez LV, et al. Ten-year experience with transvaginal vesicovaginal fistula repair using tissue interposition. J Urol. 2003;169(3):1033–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Graham JB. Vaginal fistulas following radiotherapy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1965;120:1019–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodwin WE, Scardino PT. Vesicovaginal and ureterovaginal fistulas: a summary of 25 years of experience. J Urol. 1980;123(3):370–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelly J, Kwast BE. Epidemiologic study of vesicovaginal fistulas in Ethiopia. Int Urogynecol J. 1993;4:278–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carr LK, Webster GD. Abdominal repair of vesicovaginal fistula. Urology. 1996;48(1):10–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Conor VJ, Jr, Sokol JK, Bulkley GJ, Nanninga JB. Suprapubic closure of vesicovaginal fistula. J Urol. 1973;109(1):51–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goyal NK, Dwivedi US, Vyas N, Rao MP, Trivedi S, Singh PB. A decade’s experience with vesicovaginal fistula in India. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(1):39–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pshak T, Nikolavsky D, Terlecki R, Flynn BJ. Is tissue interposition always necessary in transvaginal repair of benign, recurrent vesicovaginal fistulae? Urology. 2013;82(3):707–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eisen M, Jurkovic K, Altwein JE, Schreiter F, Hohenfellner R. Management of vesicovaginal fistulas with peritoneal flap interposition. J Urol. 1974;112(2):195–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiricuta I, Goldstein BM. Use of the greater omentum in the treatment of vesicovaginal and rectovesicovaginal fistulae after radiotherapy and cystoplastie. J Chir Paris. 1965;89(4):477–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar A, Goyal NK, Das SK, Trivedi S, Dwivedi US, Singh PB. Our experience with genitourinary fistulae. Urol Int. 2009;82(4):404–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rasool M, Tabassum SA, Mumtaz F. Vasico-vaginal fistula repair urologist’s experience at Bahawalpur. Professional Med J. 2006;13:445–52.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Punekar SV, Buch DN, Soni AB, et al. Martius’ labial fat pad interposition and its modification in complex lower urinary fistulae. J Postgrad. 1999;45(3):69–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Horch RE, Gitsch G, Schultze-Seemann W. Bilateral pedicled myocutaneous vertical rectus abdominus muscle flaps to close vesicovaginal and pouch-vaginal fistulas with simultaneous vaginal and perineal reconstruction in irradiated pelvic wounds. Urology. 2002;60(3):502–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Evans DH, Madjar S, Politano VA, Bejany DE, Lynne CM, Gousse AE. Interposition flaps in transabdominal vesicovaginal fistula repairs: are they really necessary? Urology. 2001;57(4):670–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade, Serbia

    J. Hadzi-Djokic

  2. Clinic of Urology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade School of Medicine, Resavska 51, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia

    B. Milojevic, T. Pejcic & M. Acimovic

  3. Department of Urology, Health Center, Leskovac, Serbia

    M. Petrovic

  4. Department of Urology, Health Center, Vranje, Serbia

    V. Stamenkovic

Authors
  1. J. Hadzi-Djokic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Milojevic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Pejcic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Petrovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. V. Stamenkovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Acimovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Milojevic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hadzi-Djokic, J., Milojevic, B., Pejcic, T. et al. Vesicovaginal fistulas: transperitoneal surgical repair using omentum or peritoneal tissue interposition, a summary of 35 years of experience. Eur Surg 48, 47–50 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-015-0353-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-015-0353-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation