Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bryozoans and microbial communities of cool-temperate to subtropical latitudes—paleoecological implications

II. Diversity of microbial fouling on laminar shallow marine bryozoans of Japan and New Zealand

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Facies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laminar bryozoans of shallow marine sites from cool-temperate to subtropical climate in Japan and New Zealand tolerated mainly agglutinated biofilms composed of diatoms, fungi, cyanobacteria and other bacteria as well as debris trapped in slimes. Also monobacterial films were relatively frequent on living bryozoans, while rigid, tangled mats of filamentous cyanobacteria mainly occupied surrounding substrates or dead bryozoan colonies. Three levels of microbial fouling low, medium and high were defined. Low-level fouling was more frequent on bryozoan colonies collected at warm-water settings, while medium levels became more frequent in cooler water. The decrease of microbial fouling towards lower latitudes parallels findings in part one of this study (Kaselowsky et al. 2004, this volume) in which bryozoan lamina types comparatively strong in overgrowth competition increased towards lower latitudes. Such morphological signals of competitive interaction of bryozoans and associated epizoic biofilms are potentially of paleoecologic value. Our collections from two different sampling periods revealed only small changes between seasons which may account for the predominance of oceanographic factors controlling shallow marine sampling sites around Japan and New Zealand coasts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates RL, Jackson JE (1987) Glossary of Geology. American Geol Inst, Alexandra, Virginia, 788 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Berntson EA, Bayer FM, McArthur AG, France SC (2001) Phylogenetic relationships within the Octocorallia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) based on nuclear 18SrRNA sequences. Marine Biol 138:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertling M, Insalaco E (1998) Late Jurassic coral/microbial reefs from the northern Paris basin – facies, palaeoecology and palaeobiogeography. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 39:139–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijma J, Boekschoten GJ (1995) Recent bryozoan reefs and stromatolite development in brackish inland lakes, SW Netherlands. Senckenbergiana maritima 17:163–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchette TP, Riding R (1977) Attached vermiform gastropods in Carboniferous marginal marine stromatolites and biostromes. Lethaia 10:17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Characklis WG, Wilderer PA (1989) Structure and function of biofilms. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 387 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen BF, Characklis WG (1990) Physical and chemical properties of biofilms. In: Characklis WG, Marshall KC (eds) Biofilms. John Wiley, New York, pp 93–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Davaud E, Strasser A, Jedoui Y (1994) Stromatolite and serpulid bioherms in a Holocene restricted lagoon (Sabkha El Melah, southeastern Tunesia). In: Bertrand-Safarti J, Monty C (eds) Phanerozoic stromatolites II. Kluver, Amsterdam, pp 131–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Genin A, Lazar B, Brenner S (1995) Vertical mixing and coral death in the Red Sea following the eruption of Mount Pinatubo. Nature 377:507–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes G, Krumbein WE (1987) Biolaminated deposits. In: Bhattacharya S, Friedman GM, Neugebauer HJ, Seilacher A (eds) Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences 9. Springer, Berlin, 183 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes G, Klenke TH, Noffke N (2000) Microbial signatures in peritidal siliciclastic sediments: A catalogue. Sedimentology 47:279–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein JRY (1880) Notes on living Polyzoa. J Microscopical Soc Victoria 1:42–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Golubic S, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Campbell SE (1999) Diversity of marine cyanobacteria. Bull Inst Oceanogr Monaco 19:53–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosselin LA, Quian PY (2000) Can bacterivory sustain survival and growth in early juveniles of the bryozoan Bugula neritina, the polychaete Hydroides elegans, and the barnacle Balanus amphitrite? Marine Ecol Progr Ser 192:163–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann H (2002) Diversität von Bacillaceae in Biofilmen von Fouling-Bryozoen. Master Thesis, Technical Highschool Berlin, 69 pp

  • Kaselowsky J, Scholz J, Mawatari SF, Probert KP, Gerdes G, Kadagies N, Hillmer G (2004) Bryozoans and microbial communities of cool-temperate to subtropical latitudes – paleoecological implication. I. Growth morphologies in shallow-water bryozoans settling on bivalve shells (Japan and New Zealand). Facies 50: this volume

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumbein WE (1983) Stromatolites – the challenge of a term in space and time. Precambrian Res 20:493–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumbein WE, Villbrandt M (1994) Biofilme und Mikrobenmatten extremer Lebensräume. In: Hausmann K, Kremmer BP (eds) Extremophile. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp 113–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühner S (2000) Mykologische Untersuchungen an epi- und endozoischen Biofilmen von Bryozoen. Diplomarbeit, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Studiengang Marine Umweltwissenschaften, 84 pp

  • Lauer A (2002) Arbeits- und Ergebnisbericht zum DFG-Projekt Bryozoen und Mikrobenmatten im latitudinalen Vergleich - Japan und Neuseeland (GE 64-8/1), unpublished

  • Levit GS (2001) Biogeochemistry, Biosphere, Noosphere: The Growth of the Theoretical System of Vladimir Ivanovich Vernadsky (1863-1945). In: Breidbach O, Weingarten M (eds) Studien zur Theorie der Biologie. VWB, Berlin, 116 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis WM (1976) Surface/volume ratio: implications for phytoplankton morphology. Science 192:885–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham JB, Ryland JS (1987) Function of the gizzard in Bryozoa. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 107:21–37

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney FK (1990) Feeding and associated colonial morphology in marine bryozoans. Rev Aquat Sci 2:255–280

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney FK, Jackson JBC (1989): Bryozoan evolution. Unwin Hyman, London and Chicago 238 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoya H, Golubic S (1991) Morphological variability in natural populations of mat-forming cyanobacteria. Algolog Stud 64:423–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Muyzer G, de Waal E, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Applied Environm Microbiol 59:695–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Palinska KA, Scholz J, Sterflinger K, Gerdes G, Bone Y (1999) Microbial mats associated with bryozoans (Coorong Lagoon, South Australia). Facies 41:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt BR (1982) Stromatolite decline – a reconsideration. Geology 10:512–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinsep M, Morris BD (1996) Secondary metabolites from New Zealand marine Bryozoa. In: Gordon DP, Smitz AM, Grant-Mackie JA (eds) Bryozoans in space and time. NIWA Nat Inst Water Atmospheric Res, Wellington, pp 227–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Pukall R, Kramer J, Rohde M, Stackebrandt E (2001) Microbial diversity of cultivatable bacteria associated with the North Sea bryozoan Flustra foliacea. System Appl Microbiol 24:623–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds CS, Walsby AE (1975) Water blooms. Biol Rev 50:437–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding RE, Awramik SM (2000) Microbial sediments. Springer, Berlin, 331 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippka R, Deruelles J, Waterbury JB, Herdman M, Stanier RY (1979) The cyanobacteria, generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J General Microbiol 111:1–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryland JS (1971) Bryozoa (Polyzoa) and Marine Fouling. In: Jones EBG, Eltringham SK (eds) Marine Borers, Fungi and Fouling Organisms of Wood. Proceedings OECD Workshop Portsmouth 1968, pp 137–154

  • Schmaljohann R (1993) Mikrobielle Aspekte von Fluid- und Gasaustritten. In: Meyer-Reil LA, Köster M (eds) Mikrobiologie des Meeresbodens. G Fischer, Jena, pp 221–257

  • Scholz J (1993) Indications for microbial clues for bryozoans when settling. Facies 29:107–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz J (1995) Bryozoan “Micro-Reefs”: Epibiontic microorganisms as local control factor of bryozoan distribution. Beitr Paläontol 20:75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz J (2000) Eine Feldtheorie der Bryozoen, Mikrobenmatten und Sediment-Oberflächen. Abh senckenberg naturforsch Ges 552:193 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz J, Hillmer G (1995) Reef-bryozoans and bryozoan-microreefs - control factor evidence from the Philippines and other regions. Facies 32:109–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz J, Krumbein WE (1996) Microbial mats and biofilms associated with bryozoans. In: Gordon DP, Smith AM, Grant-Mackie JA (eds) Bryozoans in space and time. NIWA National Inst. Water Atmospheric Res., Wellington, pp 283–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz J, Sterflinger K, Junge C, Hillmer G (2000) A preliminary report on bryostromatolites. Proc 11th Internat Bryozoology Association Conference, 376–384 (Allan Press)

  • Seong-Joo L, Browne KM, Golubic S (2000) On stromatolite lamination. In: Riding RE, Awramik SM (eds) Microbial Sediments. Springer, Berlin, pp 16–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellenberger JS, Ross JRP (1998) Antibacterial activity of two species of bryozoans from northern Puget Sound. Northwest Science 72:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Soule JD, Soule DF (1977) Fouling and bioadhesion: Life strategies of bryozoans. In: Woollacot ERM, Zimmer RL (eds) Biology of Bryozoans. Academic Press, New York, pp 437–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr AR (1969) A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 26:31–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sterflinger K, Scholz J (1997) Fungal infection and bryozoan morphology. Courier Forschungsinst Senckenberg 201:433–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt E (1973) Environmental Conditions of Bryozoan Ecology of the Hardground Biotope of the Maastrichtian Tuff-Chalk, near Maastricht (Netherlands). In: Larwood GP (ed) Living and fossil Bryozoa. Academic Press, London, pp 185–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachendörfer V, Riege H, Krumbein WE (1994) Parahistological sediment in thin sections. In: Krumbein WE, Paterson DM, Stal LJ (eds) Biostabilization of sediments. Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Oldenburg, pp 257–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls JT, Ritz DA, Blackman AJ (1993) Fouling, surface bacteria and antibacterial agents of four bryozoan species found in Tasmania, Australia. J Exp Marine Biol Ecol 169:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitton BA, Potts M (2000) The ecology of cyanobacteria: their diversity in time and space. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 669 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston JE (1977) Feeding in Marine Bryozoans. In Woollacot RM, Zimmer RL (eds.) Biology of Bryozoans. Academic Press, New York, pp 233–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston JE (1988) Life histories of free-living bryozoans. Nat Geogr Res 4:528–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston JE, Håkansson E (1989) Molting by Cupuladria doma, a free-living bryozoan. Bull Marine Sci 44:1152–1158

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Bruns MA, Tiedje JM (1996) DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl Environm Microbiol 62:316–322

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to D. P. Gordon (Wellington, New Zealand), K. P. Probert (Dunedin, New Zealand), S. F. Mawatari (Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan), A. Gorbushina and K. Palinska (Oldenburg, Germany), R. Crawford and F. Hinz (Bremerhaven, Germany), for their help in species determinations and constructive discussions. In addition, we gratefully acknowledge the possibilities for carrying out some SEM microphotographs using a field emission scanning electron microscope kindly provided by the NASA JSC Astrobiology Institute, Houston (photograph courtesy of Prof. Dr. Penny Morris-Smith and Mrs. Teresa G. Langazo). The critical reviews of the manuscript by two anonymous reviewers were kindly appreciated. This study was supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) project GE 64/8-1, 64/8-2, cooperation projects no 446 JAP-113/216/0, 447 NSL-113/4/9, and by the Research Agencies of Japan (JSPS), and New Zealand (MREST).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gisela Gerdes.

Appendices

Appendix A1: Glossary of terms used

Agglutinated biofilm

The main type of microbial build-ups in this study containing significant amounts of detrital components bound together by extracellular polymeric substances; see also EPS.

Biofilm

Aggregates of microbial cells developing at interfaces and embedded in a matrix of EPS. The biofilm organization provides advantages in terms of protection, synergisms, exchange of nutrients, signals and genes.

Common

Ecological term to characterize the estimated abundance of species within an association or assemblage of organisms: species relatively abundant but not dominant; see also rare.

Dominant

Ecological term to characterize the estimated abundance of species within an association or assemblage of organisms: a species or species group that is particularly abundant; see also common, rare.

Epizoic

Organisms living attached to the surface of metazoans.

EPS

Organic polymers of microbial origin which in biofilm systems are frequently responsible for binding cells and other particulate materials together and to the substratum (Characklis and Wilderer .1989)

Frequency

Estimations of the number of observations of a structure, species or taxon group in relation to the whole number of samples.

Microbial fouling

The attachment and growth of biofilms on submersed surfaces (modified after Glossary of Geology, Bates and Jackson 1987).

Microbial mat

Tangled, carpet-like cover of sedimentary surfaces produced by microbial communities in which species forming filamentous cell chains are dominant (e.g., cyanobacteria). Microbial communities in mat-like systems coexist in self-organizing patterns. Their metabolic interactions influence and imprint deeply the substrate on which they grow (Krumbein 1983).

Morphotype

The visible character of organismic structures that reflects the interaction of genotype and environment (bryozoans and biofilms in the study presented here).

Rare

Ecologic term used to characterize the estimated abundance of species within an association or assemblage of organisms; here: species that occur only in small numbers in relation to other members.

Stromatolite

Biolaminated rock. Lamina are built of tissue-like microbial mats (stroma).

Trapping

The ability of biofilms and microbial mats to trap sediments from near bottom fluids.

Appendix A2: Criteria used for the distinction of low, medium and high levels of bryozoan-associated microbial fouling, based on microscopic, microbiological and molecular data obtained in this study:

Low level fouling (Figs. 3a–b, d)):

  • proportion of zooid space covered by biofilms <50%

  • biofilm composition: mainly diffuse water-enriched slimes which agglutinate diatom debris, mineral particles and floccose organic matter (this type we term “agglutinated biofilm”); some few individual organisms are visible which are dispersed rather than colonially organized. Filamentous forms are rare.

  • biofilm consistency: low degree of cohesion

  • biofilm distribution on the zooids: patchy, inhomogenous

Medium level fouling (Fig. 3c):

  • proportion of zooid space covered by biofilms 50–75%

  • biofilm composition: while the category “agglutinated biofilm” (see above) is still dominant, colonial aggregates of organisms (both coccoid and filamentous) become increasingly abundant (Fig. 2b)

  • biofilm consistency: increasingly coherent

  • biofilm distribution on the zooids: increasingly homogenous, colonial aggregates of individuals of the same species occupy larger areas

High level fouling (Figs. 3f–g)):

  • proportion of zooid space covered by biofilms > 75%

  • biofilm composition: morphological heterogeneity due to filamentous and coccoid organisms

  • biofilm consistency: highly tangled and cohesive due to EPS enrichment including slimes, capsules and sheathes (Fig. 3g)

  • biofilm distribution: larger areas homogeneously covered

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerdes, G., Kadagies, N., Kaselowsky, J. et al. Bryozoans and microbial communities of cool-temperate to subtropical latitudes—paleoecological implications. Facies 50, 363–389 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10347-004-0037-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10347-004-0037-2

Keywords

Navigation