Skip to main content
Log in

Failure mechanism of an ancient sensitive clay landslide in eastern Canada

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a geotechnical study of a Champlain Sea clay landslide at Breckenridge, Quebec, Canada. Previous studies have interpreted the landslide as triggered by an earthquake occurred about 1020 cal years BP. The current study is to estimate the minimum ground acceleration required to trigger the landslide as part of an effort to further understand the earthquake. The study consists of field and laboratory testing and slope stability analysis. Considerable evidences are presented to understand the slope failure mechanism. The result indicates a minimum horizontal ground acceleration of 0.28 g occurred at the site. Most importantly, the paper provides a case history for better understanding landslide hazards associated with sensitive clay failures in the region. Particularly, the study finds that the landslide is a “flake” type failure as opposed to a retrogressive failure commonly perceived for Champlain Sea clay landslides. It brings to light the “flake” slide as an important factor to consider for improvement of the current predictive models for sensitive clay failures. It also shows that earthquake-triggered “flake” slide can be much larger than retrogressive failures in the same settings. The case history may therefore help as a reference for improved mitigative measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams J (2011) Seismic hazard maps for the National Building Code of Canada. Proc. Symp. of the CSCE 2011 General Conference, 14–17 June 2011, Ottawa. pp. JHS-1-1 to 9

  • Atkinson GM, Assatourians K (2010) Attenuation and source characteristics of the June 23, 2010 M5.0 Val-des-Bois, Quebec earthquake. Seismol Res Lett 81(5):849–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerrum L (1955) Stability of natural slopes in quick clay. Géotechnique 5:101–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerrum L (1973) Problems of soil mechanics and construction on soft clays and structurally unstable soils (collapsible, expansive and others). State-of-the-art Report to Session 4, Proc. 8th ICSMFE, 3:111–159, Moscow, 1973. Also publi. in: Norw. Geotechn. Inst., Publ. 100

  • Brooks GR (2013) A massive sensitive clay landslide, Quyon Valley, southwestern Quebec, Canada, and evidence for a paleoearthquake triggering mechanism. Quat Res 80:425–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks GR (2015) Evidence of paleoseismicity within the West Quebec seismic zone, eastern Canada, from the age and morphology of sensitive clay landslides. Proc. 6th international INQUA Meeting on Paleoseismology, Active Tectonics and Archaeoseismology, 19-24 Apr. 2015, Pescina, Fucino Basin, Italy. pp 59-62

  • Carson MA (1977) On the retrogression of landslides in sensitive muddy sediments. Can Geotech J 14:582–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson MA (1979) On the retrogression of landslides in sensitive muddy sediments: reply. Can Geotech J 16:431–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow H, Alpay S, Hinton M, Knight R, Oldenborger G, Percival JP, Pugin AJM, Pelchat P (2017) Geophysical, geotechnical, geochemical, and mineralogical datasets collected in Champlain Sea sediments in the municipality of Pontiac, Quebec. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 7881. 45 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.4095/301664

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. Landslides – investigation and mitigation, special report 247, US Transportation Research Board, 36–75

  • Demers D, Robitaille D, Locat P, Potvin J (2014) Inventory of large landslides in sensitive clay in the province of Québec, Canada: preliminary analysis. J.-S. L’Heureux et al (eds), Landslides in sensitive clays: from geosciences to risk management, Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research 36:77–89. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7079-9

  • Dyke AS, Prest VK (1987) Late Wisconsinan and Holocene history of the Laurentide ice sheet. Géog Phys Quatern 41:237–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden WJ, Matyas EL, Irwin W (1965) The Breckenridge landslide. National Research Council Canada Division of Building Research, Internal Report No. 316. 13 p

  • Eden WJ, Fletcher EB, Mitchell RJ (1971) South Nation River landslide, 16 May 1971. Can Geotech J 8:446–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans SG, Brooks GR (1994) An earthflow in sensitive Champlain Sea sediments at Lemieux, Ontario, June 20, 2993, and its impact on the South Nation River. Can Geotech J 31:384–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadd NR (1986) Lithofacies of Leda clay in the Ottawa basin of the Champlain Sea. Geol Surv Can Pap:85–21

  • Gadd NR (1987) Geological setting and quaternary deposits of the Ottawa region. In: Fulton, R.J. (ed). Quaternary geology of the Ottawa region, Ontario and Quebec. Geol Surv Can Pap, 86-23, pp 3–9

  • Geo-Slope International Ltd (2010) Stability modeling with slope/W 2007 Version – an engineering methodology, Fourth Edition. 367 p

  • Konrad JM, Law KT (1987) Undrained shear strength from piezocone tests. Can Geotech J 24(3):392–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L’Heureux JS (2012) A study of the retrogressive behavior and mobility of Norwegian quick clay landslides. Proc. of the 11th Int. & 2nd North American Symp. on Landslides, Banff, Canada, 3–8 June 2012

  • Lawrence DE, Morey CR, Aylsworth JA (1997) Landslides in sensitive marine clays, South Nation River valley; The role of ravines in limiting retrogression. Proc. 50th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Ottawa, 20–22 Oct. 1997, pp 815–822

  • Lebuis J, Robert JM, Rissmann P (1983) Regional mapping of landslide hazard in Quebec. Proc. Symp. Slopes on soft clays, SGI report 17, Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Linkoping, Sweden, 1983:205–262

  • Leroueil S, Locat J, Vaunat J, Picarelli L, Lee H, Faure R (1996) Geotechnical characterization of slope movements. Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Landslides, Trondheim, pp 53–74

  • Lin L, Adams J (2010) Strong motions from Nearby seismometer records of the Val-des-Bois, Québec, earthquake of June 23, 2010. Canadian Hazard Information Service Internal Report 2010–2.1, 23 pages plus digital Appendix

  • Locat J, Demers D (1988) Viscosity, yield stress, remolded strength, and liquidity index relationships for sensitive clays. Can Geotech J 25(4):799–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locat A, Leroueil S, Bernander S, Demers D, Jostad HP, Ouehb L (2011) Progressive failures in eastern Canadian and Scandinavian sensitive clays. Can Geotech J 48:1696–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma S, Motazedian D (2012) Studies on the June 23, 2010 North Ottawa Mw 5.2 earthquake and vicinity seismicity. J Seismol 16:513–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RJ, Markell AR (1974) Flowsliding in sensitive soils. Can Geotech J 11(1):11–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odenstad (1951) The landslide at Skottorp on the Lidan River February 2, 1946. Royal Swedish Geotechnical Institute Proceedings, No. 4, pp 7–39

  • Perret D, Mompin R, Demers D, Lefebvre G, Pugin AJM (2013) Two large sensitive clay landslides triggered by the 2010 Val-Des-Bois earthquake, Quebec (Canada) – implications for risk management. Poster, First Int. Workshop on Landslides in Sensitive Clays (IWLSC), Quebec, Canada, 28-30 Oct. 2013

  • Potvin J, Thibault C, Demers D, Hilodeau C (2014) An overview of the mapping of landslide-prone areas and risk management strategies in the Province of Qubec, Canada. J.-S. L’Heureux et al (eds), Landslides in Sensitive Clays: From Geosciences to Risk Management, Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research 36: 331–342. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7079-9

  • Quigley RM, Gwyn QHJ, White WL, Rowe RK, Haynes JE, Bohdanowicz A (1983) Leda clay from deep boreholes at Hawkesbury, Ontario. Part I: Geology and geotechnique. Can Geotech J 20:288–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn PE, Diederichs MS, Rowe RK, Hutchinson DJ (2011) A new model for large landslides in sensitive clay using a fracture mechanics approach. Can Geotech J 48:1151–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy S, Hawlayder B (2017) Finite element modelling of progressive and retrogressive failure of submarine slopes for varying angle of inclination. Proc. 70th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Ottawa, Oct. 1-4, 2017

  • Tavenas F, Leroueil S (1987) State-of-the-art on laboratory and in-situ stress-strain-time behavior of soft clays. Proc Int Symp Geot Engineering of Soft Soils, Mexico City, Vol. 2: 1–46

  • Tavenas F, Flon P, Leroueil S, Lebuis J (1983) Remolding energy and risk of slide retrogression in sensitive clays. Proc. Symp. Slopes on Soft Clays, Linkoping, March 8–10, 1982; Swedish Geotechnical Institute Report No. 17, pp 423–454

  • Thakur V, Degago SA (2013) Disintegration energy of sensitive clays. Géotechnique Letters 3:20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur V, Degago SA, Oset F, Aaboe R, Dolva BK, Aunaas K, Nyheim T, Lyche E, Jensen OA, Sæter MB, Robsrud A, Viklund M, Nigussie D, L’Heureux J-S (2014) Characterization of post-failure movements of landslides in soft sensitive clays. L’Heureux et al. (eds.), Landslides in Sensitive Clays: from Geosciences to Risk Management, Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research 36, pp 91–103. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7079-9_8

  • Trak B, Lacasse S (1996) Soils susceptible to flow slides and associated failure mechanisms. Proc. 7th Int. Symp. Landslides, Trondheim, pp 497–506

  • Varnes DJ (1958) Landslide types and processes. Eckel EB (ed) Landslides and engineering practice, HRB, Special Rept 29:20–47

  • Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. Landslides analysis and control, special report 176, Transportation Research Board, U.S. National Academy of Sciences, 11–33

  • Wang B (2016a) Local shaking intensity of an earthquake that triggered Quyon Valley landslide 1020 cal yr BP. Proc. 69th Canadian geotechnical conference, Vancouver, 2–5 Oct. 2016

  • Wang B (2016b) Geotechnical test results at a prehistoric landslide site in Breckenridge, southwestern Quebec. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 8013, 23 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.4095/298755

  • Yu HS, Mitchell JK (1998) Analysis of cone resistance: review of methods. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(2):140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Sloan SW, Onate E (2018) Dynamic modelling of retrogressive landslides with emphasis on the role of clay sensitivity. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 2018:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2815

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Alain Grenier for his assistance on field works. Greg Brooks kindly provided access to LiDAR data and insight into the landslide. His knowledge on the landslides in the study area allowed optimization of the field work plans. Katie MacDonald assisted in initial field works. The author would also like to thank Greg Brooks, Scott Dallimore, and Ted Lawrence for their kind input to the earlier works. Kind review and comments from Kevin MacKillop and two other anonymous reviewers helped improve the quality of the paper considerably. This paper is a product of the Public Safety Geoscience Program of Natural Resources Canada with NRCan contribution number: 20180294.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baolin Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, B. Failure mechanism of an ancient sensitive clay landslide in eastern Canada. Landslides 16, 1483–1495 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01198-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01198-4

Keywords

Navigation