Correction to: European Journal of Wildlife Research https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-022-01567-w

The original version of this article contained a mistake. The equation used to convert the precipitation δ2H (δ2Hp) isoscape into a feather δ2H (δ2Hf) isoscape was: δ2Hf = 4.73 + 0.78*δ2Hp. However, the original equation from Hobson et al. (2009) converted δ2Hf to δ2Hp values (δ2Hp = 4·73 + 0·78*(δ2Hf)) to estimate probable origins based on the δ2Hp isoscape surface. Here, we converted the Hobson et al. (2009) equation to derive a δ2Hf isoscape and incorporated it into a multivariate assignment to origin analysis with δ13Cf as described in Marx et al. (2022) to determine possible regions of moult origin of turtle doves. The corrected assignment to origin analysis results, the original assignment in Marx et al. (2022) and the difference between the two origin rasters are shown in Fig. 1. Due to minimal differences between the two assignment rasters, we did not undertake additional analyses as in Marx et al. (2022) and have not changed interpretations of our data.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Revised (A) and original (B) assignment to likely wintering origin (moulting areas of winter-grown primary feathers) of European turtle doves (n = 181) sampled in seven different European countries (see Fig. 1 in original paper) predicted from a multivariate normal probability distribution function based on tenth primary feather (P10) δ2H and δ13C isotope assignments of individual birds, and the difference between the proportions of revised and original assignments (C). See the original text of Marx et al. (2022) for the assignment methods

The original article has been corrected.