Abstract
Buoyancy has a substantial contribution to the total mechanical cost of diving in waterbirds. Most of the techniques currently employed to estimate buoyancy are based on measuring the volume of carcasses or forcibly submerged birds using the water displacement (Archimedes) principle. In such techniques, the voluntary control the bird might have over plumage and respiratory air volumes is neglected. Here, I propose an adjustment to the water displacement measurement that allows the measurement of buoyancy in real-time from unrestrained live birds diving voluntarily. The novelty and accuracy of the technique lie in using a pressure sensor to continuously measure the water level inside the dive tank while filtering out the interference from surface waves. The error of the volume measurement in the proposed technique was only ±2.4%. Feasibility of measurement is demonstrated on captive Great Cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis). The measured volumes of Great Cormorants exceeded predictions made based on the volume of carcasses and on average resembled values measured from live restrained birds. However the technique highlighted the high variation in buoyancy of live birds (up to 30%) as a result of small changes in the air volumes taken with the bird underwater.
References
Enstipp MR, Grémillet D, Jones DR (2006) The effect of depth temperature and food ingestion on the foraging energetics of a diving endotherm, the double crested cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus). J Exp Biol 209:845–859
Grémillet D, Chauvin C, Wilson RP, Le Maho Y, Wanless S (2005) Unusual feather structure allows partial plumage wettability in diving great cormorants. J Avian Biol 36:57–63
Lovvorn JR, Jones DR (1991) Body mass, volume and buoyancy of some aquatic birds and their relation to locomotor strategies. Can J Zool 96:2888–2892
Lovvorn JR, Jones DR (1994) Biomechanical conflicts between adaptation for diving and aerial flight in estuarine birds. Estuaries 17:62–75
Mahoney SH (1984) Plumage wettability of aquatic birds. Auk 101:181–185
Muralikrishnan B, Raja J (2009) Computational surface and roundness metrology. Springer, London
Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW (1975) Digital signal processing. Prentice-Hall, London
Ribak G, Weihs D, Arad Z (2004) How do cormorants counter buoyancy during submerged swimming? J Exp Biol 207:2101–2114
Ribak G, Weihs D, Arad Z (2005) Water retention in the plumage of diving great cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis. J Avian Biol 36:89–95
Ribak G, Klein N, Weihs D, Arad Z (2006) Adjustment of submerged swimming to changes in buoyancy in cormorants. Can J Zool 84:383–396
Ribak G, Strod T, Weihs D, Arad Z (2007) Optimal descent angles for shallow diving cormorants. Can J Zool 85:561–573
Ribak G, Weihs D, Arad Z (2008) Consequences of buoyancy to the maneuvering capabilities of a foot-propelled aquatic predator, the great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis). J Exp Biol 211:3009–3019
Sato K, Naito Y, Kato A, Niizuma Y, Watanuki Y, Charrassin JB, Bost CA, Handrich Y, Le Maho Y (2002) Buoyancy and maximal diving depth in penguins: do they control inhaling air volume? J Exp Biol 205:1189–1197
Seamans TW, Hamershock DW, Bernhardt GE (1995) Determination of body density for twelve bird species. Ibis 137:424–428
Stephenson R (1993) The contribution of body tissues, respiratory system and plumage to buoyancy in waterfowl. Can J Zool 71:1521–1529
Stephenson R (1995) Respiratory and plumage gas volumes in unrestrained diving ducks (Aythya affinis). Respir Physiol 100:129–137
Stephenson R, Andrews CA (1997) The effect of water surface tension on feather wettability in aquatic birds. Can J Zool 74:288–294
Watanuki Y, Niizuma Y, Gabrielsen G, Sato K, Naito Y (2003) Stroke and glide of wing-propelled divers: deep diving seabirds adjust surge frequency to buoyancy change with depth. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:483–488
Watanuki Y, Takahashi A, Daunt F, Wanless S, Harris M, Sato K, Naito Y (2005) Regulation of stroke and glide in a foot propelled avian diver. J Exp Biol 208:2207–2216
Wilson RP, Wilson M-P (1995) Buoyancy and depth utilization in foraging cormorants: wet feathers and that sinking feeling. Le Gerfaut 85:41–47
Wilson RP, Hustler K, Ryan PG, Burger AE, Noldeke EC (1992) Diving birds in cold water: do Archimedes and Boyle determine energetic cost? Am Nat 140:179–200
Acknowledgments
I thank Zeev Arad and Daniel Weihs from the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology for allowing me access to their research facilities and birds, William Rose for helpful comments and for his Gaussian low-pass filter procedure on MATLAB Central, John G. Swallow for hosting me at the University of South Dakota during part of the time course of this work, Ruth Almon, Shani Set and Tamar Eviatar-Ribak for vital help in training the birds and in the experiments, and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on the manuscript. The experiments described comply with the current laws of Israel.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by P. H. Becker.
Appendix—the 1D low-pass Gaussian filter
Appendix—the 1D low-pass Gaussian filter
The theoretical background for digital filter design is covered by any Signal-Processing text book (e.g. Oppenheim and Schafer 1975). A more specific description of the Gaussian filter can be found in Muralikrishnan and Raja (2009). Only the basic principles are summarized below.
A low-pass Gaussian filter has an impulse response (in the time domain) in the form:
From the equation we can see that σ is the only parameter that adjusts the function. We seek the value of σ that for a given cutoff frequency (f c) reduces the magnitude of the frequency response function to \( {\raise0.7ex\hbox{$1$} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 {\sqrt 2 }}}\right.\kern-\nulldelimiterspace} \!\lower0.7ex\hbox{${\sqrt 2 }$}} \) (i.e. -3 dB). The Fourier transform of a Gaussian is a Gaussian as well. Hence the amplitude transmission of the filter in the time domain may be written as
For the cutoff frequency (f c):
which yields:
Substituting Eq. 8 in Eq. 5 for the time points of the pressure signal data gives the coefficients of the filter.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ribak, G. A technique to measure the volume of diving birds during voluntary dives. J Ornithol 151, 963–969 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0539-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0539-3