Skip to main content
Log in

Preservation of winter social dominance status in Brent Geese Branta bernicla bernicla within and across winters

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dominant and subordinate individuals in a group may benefit from the stability of the social dominance organisation, avoiding excessive waste of time and energy in aggressive interactions and reducing injury risks. Nevertheless, the likely evolutionary incentive for individuals to become, and furthermore to stay, dominant may destabilise such dominance hierarchies. In this context, the relative importance of fixed (e.g. sex, morphological size) and fluctuating (e.g. body condition, mating status, reproductive success, social unit size) traits influencing the establishment and preservation of dominance relationships could play a key role in group structure. We investigated the relative role of fixed and fluctuating traits on social status in Dark-bellied Brent Geese Branta bernicla bernicla which form large fairly unstable groups both within and across winters. We compared individual dominance scores of ringed Brent Geese during four consecutive winters. Brent Geese conserved their dominance score within a given winter irrespective of their age but were generally unable to conserve it across consecutive winters. As winter dominance scores correlated best with social unit size, dominance status thus appeared to be mostly a by-product of a fluctuating trait: breeding success in the previous summer. When we considered only adults that had the same social unit size during two consecutive winters, we observed a significant preservation of dominance scores. This result suggests that a fixed trait such as sex or morphological size may still play a role in setting dominance status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archawaranon M, Dove L, Wiley RH (1991) Social inertia and hormonal control of aggression and dominance in white-throated sparrows. Behaviour 118:42–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer J (1988) The behavioural biology of aggression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein IS (1981) Dominance: the baby and the bathwater. Behav Brain Sci 4:419–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Bêty J, Gauthier G, Korpimäki E, Giroux J-F (2002) Shared predators and indirect trophic interactions: lemming cycles and arctic-nesting geese. J Anim Ecol 71:88–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Black JM, Owen M (1987) Determinants of social rank in goose flocks: acquisition of social rank in young geese. Behaviour 102:129–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Black JM, Owen M (1989a) Agonistic behaviour in barnacle goose flocks: assessment, investment and reproductive success. Anim Behav 37:199–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Black JM, Owen M (1989b) Parent-offspring relationships in wintering barnacle geese. Anim Behav 37:187–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler J (2003) Family cohesion in greylag goose Anser anser broods following catching and ringing. Ring Migr 21:181–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd H (1953) On encounters between wild white-fronted geese in winter-flocks. Behaviour 5:85–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Brotons L (1998) Status signalling in the coal tit (Parus ater): the role of previous knowledge of individuals. Etología 6:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Bub H (1991) Bird trapping and bird banding. A handbook for trapping methods all over the world. Cornell University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley N (1986) Comparison of the band-colour preferences of two species of estrildid finches. Anim Behav 34:1732–1741

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthill IC, Hunt S, Cleary C, Clark C (1997) Colour bands, dominance, and body mass regulation in male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1093–1099

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin LA, Earley RL (2004) Individual recognition, dominance hierarchies and winner and loser effects. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1537–1540

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinge BS (1989) A multifactorial explanation for variation in breeding performance of brent geese Branta bernicla. Ibis 131:196–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Ens BJ, Goss-Custard JD (1984) Interference among oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, feeding on mussels, Mytilus edulis, on the Exe Estuary. J Anim Ecol 53:217–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire PE, Ankney CD (1990) Agonistic behavior and dominance relationships among lesser snow geese during winter and spring migration. Auk 107:550–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Guhl AM (1968) Social inertia and social stability in chickens. Anim Behav 16:219–232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin ZT (1980) Individual odors and individual recognition: review and commentary. Biol Behav 5:233–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochbaum HA (1942) Sex and age determination of waterfowl by cloacal examination. Trans N Am Wildl Conf 7:299–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketterson ED (1979) Status signaling in dark-eyed juncos. Auk 96:94–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambeck RHD (1990a) Differences in migratory pattern and habitat choice between social classes of the brent goose Branta b. bernicla. Ardea 78:426–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambeck RHD (1990b) The applicability of age ratio and brood size counts in population dynamic studies of the brent goose Branta b. bernicla. Ardea 78:414–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht J (1986a) Social dominance and reproductive success in a goose flock (Anser indicus). Behaviour 97:50–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht J (1986b) Structure and causation of the dominance hierarchy in a flock of bar-headed geese (Anser indicus). Behaviour 96:28–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Loonen MJJE, Bruinzeel LW, Black JM, Drent RH (1999) The benefit of large broods in barnacle geese: a study using natural and experimental manipulations. J Anim Ecol 68:753–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen M, Black JM (1989) Factors affecting the survival of barnacle geese on migration from the breeding grounds. J Anim Ecol 58:603–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper WH (1997) Social dominance in birds. Early findings and new horizons. In: Nolan V Jr, Ketterson ED, Thompson CF (eds) Current ornithology. Plenum, New York, pp 125–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Poisbleau M, Fritz H, Valeix M, Perroi P-Y, Dalloyau S, Lambrechts MM (2006a) Social dominance correlates and family status in wintering dark-bellied brent geese, Branta bernicla bernicla. Anim Behav 71:1351–1358

    Google Scholar 

  • Poisbleau M, Jenouvrier S, Fritz H (2006b) Assessing the reliability of dominance scores for assigning individual ranks in a hierarchy. Anim Behav 72:835–842

    Google Scholar 

  • Poisbleau M, Desmonts D, Fritz H (2008) Dominance relationships in dark-bellied brent geese Branta bernicla bernicla at spring staging areas. Ardea 96:135–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell TE (1974) The concept of social dominance. Behav Biol 11:131–154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer B (1984) Biostatistique. Morin, Boucherville, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedinger JS, Flint PL (1995) Environmental influence on life-history traits: growth, survival, and fecundity in black brant (Branta bernicla). Ecology 76:2404–2414

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedinger JS, Herzog MP, Ward DH (2004) Early environment and recruitment of black brant (Branta bernicla nigricans) into the breeding population. Auk 121:68–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Siriwardena GM, Black JM (1999) Parent and gosling strategies in wintering barnacle geese. Wildfowl 44:18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman KA, Wilson L, Freel JA, Taylor AC, Metcalfe NB, Gilmour KM (2002) The effects of increased flow rates on linear dominance hierarchies and physiological function in brown trout, Salmo trutta. Can J Zool 80:1221–1227

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York

  • Spaans B, Postma P (2001) Inland pastures are an appropriate alternative for salt-marshes as a feeding area for spring-fattening dark-bellied brent geese Branta bernicla. Ardea 89:427–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaans B, Blijleven HJ, Popov IU, Rykhlikova ME, Ebbinge BS (1998) Dark-bellied brent geese Branta bernicla bernicla forego breeding when Artic foxes Alopex lagopus are present during nest initiation. Ardea 86:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS (1999) SPSS Base 10.0 user’s guide. SPSS, Chicago

  • Stahl J, Tolsma PH, Loonen MJJE, Drent RH (2001) Subordinates explore but dominants profit: resource competition in high Arctic barnacle goose flocks. Anim Behav 61:257–264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Summers RW, Underhill LG, Howells RJ, Vickery JA, Prÿs-Jones RP (1996) Phenology of migration and use of wintering sites by the increasing population of dark-bellied brent geese Branta bernicla bernicla. J Zool Lond 239:197–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Underhill LG, Prÿs-Jones RP, EE Syroechkovski Jr, Groen NM, Karpov V, Lappo HG, Van Roomen MWJ, Rybkin A, Schekkerman H, Spiekman H, Summers RW (1993) Breeding of waders (Charadrii) and Brent geese Branta bernicla bernicla at Pronchishcheva Lake, northeastern Taimyr, Russian, in a peak and decreasing lemming year. Ibis 135:277–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ, Ankney CD (1984) Comment: a critical assumption of band-recovery models may often be violated. Wildl Soc Bull 12:198–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH, Steadman L, Chadwick L, Wollerman L (1999) Social inertia in white-throated sparrows results from recognition of opponents. Anim Behav 57:453–463

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Pierre-Yves Perroi, Léopold Denonfoux, Coraline Moreau, Thomas Biteau, Sébastien Dalloyau, Alain Kim, David Pinaud, Alexandre Millon, Diane Desmonts, Sandra Blais, Daphné Durant and more particularly Bart Ebbinge, Gerard Müsken and Janien van der Greft for help with Brent Goose manipulations and observations. We also greatly appreciated the statistical assistance of Loïc Hardouin. The manuscript benefited greatly from critical comments by Marcel M. Lambrechts, Christophe Bonenfant, Matthieu Guillemain, David Carslake, Laurent Demongin and anonymous reviewers. Thank you to Philippe Delaporte and Frédéric Corre for letting us work in the Réserve Naturelle of Moëze-Oléron. The programme was funded by the CNRS, the Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage and the EU “Coast Bird Diversity” program EVK2-2000-00612.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maud Poisbleau.

Additional information

Communicated by F. Bairlein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poisbleau, M., Guillon, N. & Fritz, H. Preservation of winter social dominance status in Brent Geese Branta bernicla bernicla within and across winters. J Ornithol 151, 737–744 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-009-0437-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-009-0437-8

Keywords

Navigation