Abstract
Objective
To evaluate a transverse electromagnetic (TEM), a circularly polarized (CP) (birdcage), and a 12-channel phased array head coil at the clinical field strength of B 0 = 3T in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), signal homogeneity, and maps of the effective flip angle α.
Materials and methods
SNR measurements were performed on low flip angle gradient echo images. In addition, flip angle maps were generated for αnominal = 30° using the double angle method. These evaluation steps were performed on phantom and human brain data acquired with each coil. Moreover, the signal intensity variation was computed for phantom data using five different regions of interest.
Results
In terms of SNR, the TEM coil performs slightly better than the CP coil, but is second to the smaller 12-channel coil for human data. As expected, both the TEM and the CP coils show superior image intensity homogeneity than the 12-channel coil, and achieve larger mean effective flip angles than the combination of body and 12-channel coil with reduced radio frequency power deposition.
Conclusion
At 3T the benefits of TEM coil design over conventional lumped element(s) coil design start to emerge, though the phased array coil retains an advantage with respect to SNR performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hoult DI (2000) Sensitivity and power deposition in a high-field imaging experiment. J Magn Reson Imaging 12: 46–67
Vaughan JT, Hetherington HP, Otu JO, Pan JW, Pohost GM (1994) High frequency volume coils for clinical NMR imaging and spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 32: 206–218
Zhang X, Ugurbil K, Chen W (2001) Microstrip RF surface coil design for extremely high-field MRI and spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 46: 443–450
Vaughan JT, Adriany G, Garwood M, Yacoub E, Duong T, DelaBarre L, Andersen P, Ugurbil K (2002) Detunable transverse electromagnetic (TEM) volume coil for high-field NMR. Magn Reson Med 47: 990–1000
Vaughan JT, Garwood M, Collins CM, Liu W, DelaBarre L, Adriany G, Andersen P, Merkle H, Goebel R, Smith MB et al (2001) 7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal-to-noise comparison in head images. Magn Reson Med 46: 24–30
Avdievich NI, Hetherington HP (2004) 4 T actively detunable transmit/receive transverse electromagnetic coil and 4-channel receive-only phased array for (1)H human brain studies. Magn Reson Med 52: 1459–1464
Zhang X, Ugurbil K, Chen W (2003) A microstrip transmission line volume coil for human head MR imaging at 4T. J Magn Reson 161: 242–251
Hayes CE, Edelstein WA, Schenck JF, Mueller OM, Eash M (1985) An efficient, highly homogeneous radiofrequency coil for whole-body NMR imaging at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson 63: 622–628
Roemer PB, Edelstein WA, Hayes CE, Souza SP, Mueller OM (1990) The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med 16: 192–225
Alecci M, Collins CM, Smith MB, Jezzard P (2001) Radio frequency magnetic field mapping of a 3 Tesla birdcage coil: experimental and theoretical dependence on sample properties. Magn Reson Med 46: 379–385
Ohliger MA, Sodickson DK (2006) An introduction to coil array design for parallel MRI. NMR Biomed 19: 300–315
Liu W, Collins CM, Delp PJ, Smith MB (2004) Effects of end-ring/shield configuration on homogeneity and signal-to-noise ratio in a birdcage-type coil loaded with a human head. Magn Reson Med 51: 217–221
Ibrahim TS, Mitchell C, Schmalbrock P, Lee R, Chakeres DW (2005) Electromagnetic perspective on the operation of RF coils at 1.5–1.7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 54: 683–690
Wang C, Shen GX (2006) B1 field, SAR, and SNR comparisons for birdcage, TEM, and microstrip coils at 7T. J Magn Reson Imaging 24: 439–443
Tropp J (2002) Dissipation, resistance, and rational impedance matching for TEM and birdcage resonators. Concepts Magn Reson B 15: 177–188
Wiggins GC, Potthast A, Triantafyllou C, Wiggins CJ, Wald LL (2005) Eight-channel phased array coil and detunable TEM volume coil for 7 T brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 54: 235–240
Hoult DI (2000) The principle of reciprocity in signal strength calculations - A mathematical guide. Concepts Magn Reson 12: 173–187
Insko EK, Bolinger L (1993) Mapping of the radiofrequency field. J Magn Reson, Ser A 103: 82–85
Stollberger R, Wach P (1996) Imaging of the active B1 field in vivo. Magn Reson Med 35: 246–251
Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S (2002) Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17: 825–841
Collins CM, Yang QX, Wang JH, Zhang X, Liu H, Michaeli S, Zhu XH, Adriany G, Vaughan JT, Anderson P et al (2002) Different excitation and reception distributions with a single-loop transmit-receive surface coil near a head-sized spherical phantom at 300 MHz. Magn Reson Med 47: 1026–1028
Wang J, Qiu M, Yang QX, Smith MB, Constable RT (2005) Measurement and correction of transmitter and receiver induced nonuniformities in vivo. Magn Reson Med 53: 408–417
Collins CM, Liu W, Schreiber W, Yang QX, Smith MB (2005) Central brightening due to constructive interference with, without, and despite dielectric resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging 21: 192–196
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mekle, R., van der Zwaag, W., Joosten, A. et al. Comparison of three commercially available radio frequency coils for human brain imaging at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Mater Phy 21, 53 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-007-0100-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-007-0100-4