Abstract
Current dual-frequency GPS measurements can only eliminate the first-order ionospheric term and may cause a higher-order range bias of several centimeters. This research investigates the second-order ionospheric effect for GNSS users in Europe. In comparison to previous studies, the electron density profiles of the ionosphere/plasmasphere are modeled as the sum of three Chapman layers describing electron densities of the ionospheric F2, F1 and E layers and a superposed exponential decay function describing the plasmasphere. The International Geomagnetic Reference Field model is used to calculate the geomagnetic field vectors at numerous points along the incoming ray paths. Based on extended simulation studies, we derive a correction formula to compute the average value of the longitudinal component of the earth’s magnetic field along the line-of-sight as a function of geographic latitude and longitude, and geometrical parameters such as elevation and azimuth angles. Using our correction formula in conjunction with the total electron content (TEC) along the line-of-sight, the second-order ionospheric term can be corrected to the millimeter level for a vertical TEC level of 1018 electrons/m2.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bassiri S, Hajj GA (1993) Higher-order ionospheric effects on the global positioning system observables and means of modeling them. Manuscripta Geodaetica 18(6):280–289
Belehaki A, Jakowski N, Reinisch BW (2004) Plasmaspheric electron content derived from GPS TEC and digisonde ionograms. Adv Space Res 33(6):833–837
Bradley PA, Dudeney JR (1973) A simple model representation of the electron concentration of the ionosphere. J Atmos Terres Phys 35(12):2131–2146
Brunner FK, Gu M (1991) An improved model for the dual frequency ionospheric correction of GPS observations. Manuscripta Geodaetica 16(3):205–214
Budden KG (1985) The propagation of radio waves: the theory of radio waves of low power in the ionosphere and magnetosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 0 521 25461 2
Davies K (1990) Ionospheric radio. Peter Peregrinus Ltd, London. ISBN 0 86341 186 X
Decker RP (1972) Techniques for synthesizing median true height profiles from propagation parameters. J Atmos Terres Phys 34(3):451–464
Fritsche M, Dietrich R, Knöfel C, Rülke A, Vey S, Rothacher M, Steigenberger P (2005) Impact of higher-order ionospheric terms on GPS estimates. Geophys Res Lett 32(23):L23311. doi: 10.1029/2005GL024342
Hajj GA, Romans LJ (1998) Ionospheric electron density profiles obtained with the global positioning system: results from GPS/MET experiment. Radio Sci 33(1):175–190
Hawarey M, Hobiger T, Schuh H (2005) Effects of the 2nd order ionospheric terms on VLBI measurements. Geophys Res Lett 32(11):L11304. doi: 10.1029/2005GL022729
Hoque MM, Jakowski N (2006) Higher-order ionospheric effects in precise GNSS positioning. J Geodesy (in press). doi: 10.1007/s00190-006-0106-0
Jakowski N (1996) TEC monitoring by using satellite positioning systems. In: Kohl H, Rüster R, Schlegel K (eds) Modern ionospheric science. EGS, Katlenburg-Lindau, ProduServ GmbH Verlagsservice, Berlin, pp 371–390, ISBN3-9804862-1-4
Jakowski N, Wehrenpfennig A, Heise S, Reigber C, Lühr H, Grunwaldt L, Meehan T K (2002) GPS radio occultation measurements of the ionosphere from CHAMP: early results. Geophys Res Lett 29(10):1457. doi: 10.1029/2001 GL014364
Jakowski N, Leitinger R, Angling M (2004) Radio occultation techniques for probing the ionosphere. Ann Geophys 47(2/3):1049–1066
Jakowski N, Stankov S M, Klaehn D, Beniguel Y, Rueffer J (2004) Operational service for monitoring and evaluating the space weather impact on precise positioning applications of GNSS. In: Proceedings of European Navigation Conference ENC-GNSS2004, Rotterdam, Paper No. GNSS2004–119
Kedar S, Hajj G, Wilson B, Heflin M (2003) The effect of the second order GPS ionospheric correction on receiver positions. Geophys Res Lett 30(16):1829. doi: 10.1029/2003 GL017639
Kelley MC (1989) The Earth’s Ionosphere, Plasmaphysics and Electrodynamics. Academic Press, New York (Appendix B)
Klobuchar JA (1996) Ionospheric effects on GPS. In: Parkinson BW (ed) Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, Vol I. American Institute of Aeronautics& Astronautics, pp 485–515. ISBN 156347106X
Langley RB (1997) The GPS error budget. GPS World 8(3):51–56
Lunt NL, Kersley L, Bailey GJ (1999) The influence of the protonosphere on GPS observations: model simulations. Radio Sci 34(3):725–732
Mandea M, Macmillan S (2000) International geomagnetic reference field—the eighth generation. Earth Planets Space 52(12):1119–1124
Norman RJ (2003) An Inversion Technique for obtaining Quasi-Parabolic layer parameters from VI Ionograms. Proceedings IEEE Radar conference, pp. 363–367. doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2003.1278768
Rishbeth H, Garriott OK (1969) Introduction to ionospheric physics. Academic Press, New York
Rizos C (2002) Network RTK Research and Implementation—a geodetic perspective. J Global Position Syst 1(2):144–150
Sardon E, Zarraoa N (1997) Estimation of total electron content using GPS data: how stable are the differential satellite and receiver instrument biases. Radio Sci 32(5):1899–1910
Stankov SM, Jakowski N (2006) Topside ionospheric scale height analysis and modelling based on radio occultation measurements. J Atmos Sol-terr Phys 68:134–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2005.10.003
Strangeways HJ, Ioannides RT (2002) Rigorous calculation of ionospheric effects on GPS Earth-Satellite paths using a precise path determination method. Acta Geod Geoph Hung 37(2–3):281–292
Wang Z, Wu Y, Zhang K, Meng Y (2005) Triple-frequency method for high-order ionospheric refractive error modeling in GPS modernization. J Global Position Syst 4(1–2):291–295
Wilkes MV (1954) A table of Chapman’s grazing incidence integral Ch(x,χ). Proc Phys Soc 67B, pp. 304
Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997). Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102(B3):5005–5017
Acknowledgements
This work has been financially supported by the German State Government of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern under Grant V230-630-08-TIFA-334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A
Appendix A
The integration of the Chapman function Eq. (8) yields the following sequence:
where z = (h − h 0)/H; applying differentiation and substitution
let x = exp (− z/2) and applying differentiation and substitution
where erfi is the imaginary error function and erf is the error function. For GPS/GLONASS orbit height (∼20,200 km) or Galileo orbit height (∼23,200 km), and E, F1 and F2 layer scale heights and peak layer heights given in section 3, we estimate the error function term \({\rm erf}( - {\rm S}^{\prime\prime}{\sqrt {\sec \chi /2}}) - {\rm erf}( - {\rm R}^{\prime\prime}{\sqrt {\sec \chi /2}})\) in Eq. (21) to be ∼1 and hence Eq. (21) can be simplified as
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoque, M.M., Jakowski, N. Mitigation of higher order ionospheric effects on GNSS users in Europe. GPS Solut 12, 87–97 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-007-0069-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-007-0069-5