Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automated Multidetector Row CT Dataset Segmentation with an Interactive Watershed Transform (IWT) Algorithm: Part 1. Understanding the IWT Technique

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Segmentation of volumetric computed tomography (CT) datasets facilitates evaluation of 3D CT angiography renderings, particularly with maximum intensity projection displays. This manuscript describes a novel automated bone editing program that uses an interactive watershed transform (IWT) technique to rapidly extract the skeletal structures from the volume. Advantages of this tool include efficient segmentation of large datasets with minimal need for correction. In the first of this two-part series, the principles of the IWT technique are reviewed, followed by a discussion of clinical utility based on our experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3

References

  1. Moore EA, Grieve JP, Jager HR: Robust processing of intracranial CT angiograms for 3D volume rendering. Eur Radiol 11:137–141, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Raman R, Raman B, Hundt W, Stucker D, Napel S, Rubin GD: Improved speed of bone removal in CT angiography (CTA) using automated targeted morphological separation: method and evaluation in CTA of lower extremity occlusive disease (LEOD). Radiology 225(P):647, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alyassin AM, Avinash GB: Semiautomated bone removal technique from CT angiography data. Proc SPIE Med Imaging Image Process 4322:1273–1283, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fiebich M, Straus CM, Sehgal V, Renger BC, Doi K, Hoffmann KR: Automatic bone segmentation technique for CT angiographic studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:155–161, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mullick R, Avila RS, Platt J, Mallya Y, Senzig R, Knoplioch J: Automatic bone removal for abdomen CTA: a clinical review. Radiology 225(P):646, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  6. Suryanarayanan S, Mullick R, Mallya Y, Wood CP, McCullough C, Thielen KR: Automatic bone removal for head CTA: a preliminary review. In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2003, p 648

  7. Kang Y, Engelke K, Kalender WA: A new accurate and precise 3-D segmentation method for skeletal structures in volumetric CT data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22:586–598, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Straten M, Venema HW, Streekstra GJ, Majoie CB, den Heeten GJ, Grimbergen CA: Removal of bone in CT angiography of the cervical arteries by piecewise matched mask bone elimination. Med Phys 31:2924–2933, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tomandl BF, Hammen T, Klotz H, et al: Bone-subtraction CT angiography for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:55–59, 2006

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Masutani Y, MacMahon H, Doi K: Automated segmentation and visualization of the pulmonary vascular tree in spiral CT angiography. An anatomy-oriented approach based on three-dimensional image analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:587–597, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoo SK, Wang G, Rubinstein JT, Vannier MW: Semiautomated segmentation of the cochlea by using real-time volume rendering and regional adaptive snake modeling. J Digital Imaging 14:173–181, 2001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boll DT, Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Smith D, Subramanyan K, Merkle EM: Assessment of automatic vessel tracking techniques in preoperative planning of transluminal aortic stent graft implantation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:278–285, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hahn HK, Peitgen HO: IWT-Interactive watershed transform: a hierarchical method for efficient interactive and automated segmentation of multidimensional gray scale images. Proc SPIE Med Imaging Image Process 5032:643–653, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hahn HK, Millar WS, Klinghammer O, Durkin MS, Tulipano PK, Peitgen HO: A reliable and efficient method for cerebral ventricular volumetry in pediatric neuroimaging. Methods Inf Med 43:376–382, 2004

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lukas C, Hahn HK, Bellenberg B, et al: Sensitivity and reproducibility of a new fast 3D segmentation technique for clinical MR-based brain volumetry in multiple sclerosis. Neuroradiology 46:906–915, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hahn HK, Wenzel MT, Konrad-Verse O, Peitgen HO: A minimally-interactive watershed algorithm designed for efficient CTA bone removal. In: Computer Vision Approaches to Medical Image Analysis. Berlin: Springer, 2006

  17. Hahn HK, Peitgen HO: The skull stripping problem in MRI solve by a single 3D watershed transform. In: MICCAI- Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention; LNCS vol. 1935. Berlin: Springer, 2000, pp 134–143

  18. Hahn HK: Morphological Volumetry–Theory, Concepts, and Application to Quantitative Medical Imaging. Ph.D. thesis; University of Bremen, Jan 2005. http://www.mevis-research.de/~hahn/download/thesis/HorstHahn-PhDThesis-2005.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elliot K. Fishman.

Additional information

David G. Heath, PhD is a part-owner and consultant of Hip Graphics, Inc. Elliot K. Fishman, MD is a co-founder of Hip Graphics, Inc. In addition, he is on the CT advisory board for and receives grant funding from Siemens Medical Solutions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heath, D.G., Hahn, H.K., Johnson, P.T. et al. Automated Multidetector Row CT Dataset Segmentation with an Interactive Watershed Transform (IWT) Algorithm: Part 1. Understanding the IWT Technique. J Digit Imaging 21, 408–412 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-007-9085-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-007-9085-9

Key words

Navigation