Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Traditional Reading Rooms to a Soft Copy Environment: Radiologist Satisfaction Survey

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Academic radiologists are experiencing increased clinical workloads. New technology such as picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are often justified on the premise of increased efficiency. The authors believe that efficiency can be influenced by the image interpretation environment, and thus they set out to establish baseline satisfaction levels with this environment. The authors surveyed 90 Indiana University (IU) faculty radiologists, fellows, and residents. Their survey was implemented with a questionnaire sent via e-mail. Questions focused on satisfaction with the current soft-copy reading environments and preferences regarding improvements. Of the 90 radiologists surveyed, 55 (61%) responded. Several key findings emerged: (1) Overall satisfaction with the soft-copy environment is low, with nearly half (46%) of respondents rating themselves as “very dissatisfied” or “dissatisfied.” (2) Faculty are least satisfied regarding work space ergonomics, room layout, and amount of work space. Appropriate lighting also emerged as an area with low satisfaction and high importance. (3) Ninety-eight percent of respondents indicated that an “ideal” soft-copy environment would have a positive effect on their efficiency. The dissatisfaction with the current soft-copy interpretation environments used by the IU radiologists indicates that this is an area that requires attention. Furthermore, there may be a direct relationship between radiologist efficiency and satisfaction with the image interpretation environment. Attention should be focused on this environment during a soft-copy technology implementation to ensure that planned efficiency gains are realized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GA Taylor (2001) ArticleTitleImpact of clinical volume on scholarly activity in an academic children’s hospital: trends, implications, and possible solutions. Pediatr Radiol 31 786–789 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002470100543 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnktV2lsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11692235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DJ Eschelman KL Sullivan L Parker et al. (2000) ArticleTitleThe relationship of clinical and academic productivity in a university hospital radiology department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 27–31

    Google Scholar 

  3. RL Arenson Y Lu SC Elliott et al. (2001) ArticleTitleMeasuring the academic radiologist’s clinical productivity: survey results for subspecialty sections. Acad Radiol 8 524–532 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80627-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzisleiuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11394548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. MJ Cortegiano (2001) ArticleTitleAcademic radiologists increase productivity: study shows large growth in four years. Radiol Business Manage Assoc Bull 36 10–14

    Google Scholar 

  5. DB Hayt S Alexander (2001) ArticleTitleThe pros and cons of implementing PACS and speech recognition systems. J Digit Imaging 14 149–157 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10278-001-0014-z Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnnsVGitg%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. DR Gale ME Gale RK Schwartz et al. (2000) ArticleTitleAn automated PACS workstation interface: a timesaving enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 33–36

    Google Scholar 

  7. A Mehta K Dreyer G Boland et al. (2000) ArticleTitleDo picture archiving and communication systems improve report turnaround times? J Digit Imaging 13 IssueIDSuppl 1 105–107 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvotVOitw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10847375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. TG Vavra (1997) Improving your measurement of customer satisfaction. ASQ Quality Press Milwaukee, WI 266–268

    Google Scholar 

  9. B Rostenberg (2002) ArticleTitleReading rooms should be designed to accommodate future changes. Diagn Imaging February 11–15

    Google Scholar 

  10. S Hatfield (2001) ArticleTitleBright lights, big problems. ADVANCE for AR 11 43–46

    Google Scholar 

  11. E Siegel B Reiner (2002) ArticleTitleRadiology reading room design: the next generation. Appl Radiol 31(4) 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  12. E Siegel B Reiner M Abiri et al. (2000) ArticleTitleThe filmless radiology reading room: a survey of established picture archiving and communication system sites. J Digit Imaging 13 (2 Suppl 1) 22–23

    Google Scholar 

  13. JH Myers (1999) Measuring customer satisfaction: hot buttons and other measurements. American Marketing Association Chicago, IL 66–70

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Radiology Education and Research Institute, and Indiana University Kelley School of Business, 714 N. Senate Ave, Ste 100, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA

    Lori L. Rumreich MBA

  2. Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Radiology Education and Research Institute, 714 N. Senate Ave, Ste 100, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA

    Annette J. Johnson MD

Authors
  1. Lori L. Rumreich MBA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annette J. Johnson MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lori L. Rumreich MBA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rumreich, L.L., Johnson, A.J. From Traditional Reading Rooms to a Soft Copy Environment: Radiologist Satisfaction Survey. J Digit Imaging 16, 262–269 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-003-1734-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-003-1734-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation