Skip to main content
Log in

Discussion to: Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications by Y. Ni, V. Baladandayuthapani, M. Vannucci and F.C. Stingo

Looking for the missing link between graphical models and social network analysis

  • Comment
  • Published:
Statistical Methods & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Comment to this article was published on 12 April 2022

The Original Article was published on 27 May 2021

Abstract

In the present contribution we provide a discussion of the paper on “Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications”. The authors present an extensive review of Bayesian graphical models, which are used for a variety of inferential tasks applied to biology and medicine settings. Our contribution proposes a conceptual connection between two scientific frameworks, graphical models and social network analysis, by highlighting also the role played by network models and random graphs. A bibliometric analysis is performed by exploiting publications collected from online bibliographic archives to map the main themes characterizing the two research fields. Specifically, a co-word network analysis is carried out using visualization tools and thematic evolution maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The query used includes the words (TS = [“network model*”] NOT TS = [neural]) OR TS = (“graph* model*”) OR TS = (“social network* analysis”). We investigate this scientific production of the two theoretical frameworks in a wider sense, avoiding to overlap neural networks field.

References

  • Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informet 11(4):959–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes JA, Harary F (1983) Graph theory in network analysis. Soc Netw 5(2):235–244

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Batagelj V, Cerinšek M (2013) On bibliographic networks. Scientometrics 96(3):845–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási A-L (2016) Network science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916):892–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bródka P, Chmiel A, Magnani M, Ragozini G (2018) Quantifying layer similarity in multiplex networks: a systematic study. R Soc Open Sci 5(8):171747

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Callon M, Courtial JP, Turner WA, Bauin S (1983) From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Soc Sci Inf 22(2):191–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2011) An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. J Informet 5(1):146–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farasat A, Nikolaev A, Srihari SN, Blair RH (2015) Probabilistic graphical models in modern social network analysis. Soc Netw Anal Min 5(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortunato S (2010) Community detection in graphs. Phys Rep 486(3–5):75–174

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano G, Ragozini G, Vitale MP (2019) Analyzing multiplex networks using factorial methods. Soc Netw 59:154–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann M, Wagner D (2003) (Eds.) Drawing graphs: methods and models. Springer, Berlin

  • Kivelä M, Arenas A, Barthelemy M, Gleeson JP, Moreno Y, Porter MA (2014) Multilayer networks. J Complex Netw 2(3):203–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krempel L (2009). Network visualization. Handbook of Social Network Analysis

  • Lauritzen SL (1996) Graphical models (Vol. 17), Clarendon Press

  • Loyal JD, Chen Y (2020) Statistical network analysis: A review with applications to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Int Stat Rev 88(2):419–440

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lusher D, Koskinen J, Robins G (2013) (Eds.), Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications (Vol. 35), Cambridge University Press

  • Ni Y, Baladandayuthapani V, Vannucci M, Stingo FC (2021) Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications. Statistical Methods & Applications, 1–29

  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Prosperina Vitale.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vitale, M.P., Giordano, G. & Ragozini, G. Discussion to: Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications by Y. Ni, V. Baladandayuthapani, M. Vannucci and F.C. Stingo. Stat Methods Appl 31, 269–278 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-021-00603-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-021-00603-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation