Skip to main content
Log in

Small area estimation: the EBLUP estimator based on spatially correlated random area effects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Statistical Methods and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with small area indirect estimators under area level random effect models when only area level data are available and the random effects are correlated. The performance of the Spatial Empirical Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (SEBLUP) is explored with a Monte Carlo simulation study on lattice data and it is applied to the results of the sample survey on Life Conditions in Tuscany (Italy). The mean squared error (MSE) problem is discussed illustrating the MSE estimator in comparison with the MSE of the empirical sampling distribution of SEBLUP estimator. A clear tendency in our empirical findings is that the introduction of spatially correlated random area effects reduce both the variance and the bias of the EBLUP estimator. Despite some residual bias, the coverage rate of our confidence intervals comes close to a nominal 95%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Anselin L (1992) Spatial econometrics: method and models. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Carlin BP, Gelfand AE (2004) Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data. Chapman & Hall, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995) Interactive spatial data analysis. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff A, Ord JK (1981) Spatial processes. Pion, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1991) Small-area prediction of undercount using the general linear model. In: Proceedings of the statistic symposium 90: measurement and improvement of data quality. Statistics Canada, Ottawa, pp 93–105

  • Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacey MF (1965) A review on measures of contiguity for two and k-color maps. Technical Report, 2, spatial diffusion study, Department of Geography, Northwestern University, Evanston

  • Datta GS, Lahiri P (2000) A unified measure of uncertainty of estimated best linear unbiased predictors in small area estimation problems. Stat Sin 10:613–627

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fay RE, Herriot RA (1979) Estimates of income for small places: an application of James-Stein procedures to census data. J Am Stat Assoc 74:269–277

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Getis A, Aldstadt J (2004) Constructing the spatial weights matrix using a local statistic. Geogr Anal 32(2):90–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh M, Rao JNK (1994) Small area estimation: an appraisal (with discussion). Stat Sci 9(1):55–93

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Harville DA, Jeske DR (1992) Mean squared error of estimation or prediction under a general linear model. J Am Stat Assoc 87:724–731

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1975) Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31:423–447

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • IRPET (2004) Indagine sulle condizioni di vita delle famiglie toscane. Technical Report, Istituto Regionale Programmazione Economica Toscana, Florence

  • Kackar RN, Harville DA (1984) Approximations for standard errors of estimators for fixed and random effects in mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 79:853–862

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Ord K, Getis A (1995) Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and application. Geogr Anal 27(3):286–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrucci A, Salvati N (2006) Small area estimation for spatial correlation in watershed erosion assessment. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 11(2):169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratesi M, Salvati N (2004) Spatial EBLUP in agricultural survey. An application based on census data. Report no 256, Department of Statistics and Mathematics, University of Pisa

  • Pratesi M, Salvati N (2005) Small area estimation: the EBLUP estimator with autoregressive random area effects. Report no 261, Department of Statistics and Mathematics, University of Pisa

  • Rao JNK (1999) Some recent advances in model-based small area estimation. Surv Methodol 25(2):175–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao JNK (2003) Small area estimation. Wiley, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao JNK (2005) Inferential issues in small area estimation: some new developments. Stat Trans 7(3):513–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao JNK, Choudhry GH (1995) Small area estimation: overview and empirical study in business survey method, vol 38. In: Cox BG, Binder DA, Chinnappa BN, Christianson A, Colledge MJ, Kott PS (eds) Wiley, New York, pp 527–540

  • Regione Toscana (1999) Deliberazione del Consiglio Regionale n. 219 del 26 luglio 1999. http://www.regione.toscana.it/programmazione/sel/

  • Robinson GK (1991) That BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects. Stat Sci 6(1):15–51

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saei A, Chambers R (2003) Small area estimation: a review of methods based on the application of mixed models. Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, WP M03/16, Southampton

  • Saei A, Chambers R (2005) Small area estimation under linear and generalized linear mixed models with time and area effects. Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, WP M03/15, Southampton

  • Salvati N (2004a) Small area estimation by spatial models: the Spatial Empirical Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (Spatial EBLUP). Working Paper no 2004/04, “G. Parenti” Department of Statistics, University of Florence

  • Salvati N (2004b) La correlazione spaziale nella stima per piccole aree: metodi proposti e casi di studio. Doctoral thesis in applied statistics, “G. Parenti” Department of Statistics, University of Florence

  • Singh BB, Shukla K, Kundu D (2005) Spatial-temporal models in small area estimation. Surv Methodol 31(2):183–195

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Verma V (2004) Sampling errors and design effects for poverty measures and other complex statistics. In: Proceedings of the VII international meeting quantitative methods for applied sciences: sampling designs for environmental, economic and social surveys: theoretical and practical perspectives, Siena

  • Zimmerman DL, Cressie N (1992) Mean squared prediction error in the spatial linear model with estimated covariance parameters. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 44(1):27–43

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Pratesi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pratesi, M., Salvati, N. Small area estimation: the EBLUP estimator based on spatially correlated random area effects. Stat. Meth. & Appl. 17, 113–141 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-007-0061-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-007-0061-9

Keywords

Navigation