Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The non-invasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer via a SOX9-based gene panel

  • Research
  • Published:
Clinical and Experimental Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) threatens human health seriously. Early diagnosis of CRC is critical to improving patient survival. Meanwhile, non-invasive detection through tumor-circulating markers can be an important auxiliary diagnosis. In this study, we performed targeted RNA sequencing in paired tumor and adjacent normal fresh frozen tissues from 68 patients, and we also measured circulating mRNA levels in 4 time-point plasma samples collected before and after operation or chemotherapy. Our results showed that SOX9 (6.73-fold with adjusted p value < 1 × 10–45), MYC (20.59-fold with adjusted p value < 1 × 10–57), and MMP7 (131.94-fold with adjusted p value < 1 × 10–78) highly expressed in tumor compared with adjacent normal tissues. Besides, the circulating mRNA of SOX9 (41.14-fold with adjusted p value < 1 × 10–13) in CRC was significantly higher than in the normal control as well. Moreover, a SOX9-based 9-gene panel (SOX9, GSK3A, FZD4, LEF1, DVL1, FZD7, NFATC1, KRT19, and RUVBL1) showed the non-invasive diagnostic value of CRC (AUC: 0.863 (0.766–0.960), TPR: 0.92, TNR: 0.87). In summary, SOX9 expression consistently increases in tumor and plasma samples from CRC patients, which indicates the important role of SOX9 in CRC progression and its potential in non-invasive diagnosis of CRC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(4):271–89. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Salvianti F, Gelmini S, Mancini I, et al. Circulating tumour cells and cell-free DNA as a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer: the OMITERC prospective study. Br J Cancer. 2021;125(1):94–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01399-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodríguez-Casanova A, Bao-Caamano A, Lago-Lestón RM, et al. Evaluation of a targeted next-generation sequencing panel for the non-invasive detection of variants in circulating DNA of colorectal cancer. J Clin Med. 2021;10(19):4487. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao YJ, Song X, Niu L, Tang Y, Song X, Xie L. Circulating exosomal miR-150-5p and miR-99b-5p as diagnostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pan B, Qin J, Liu X, et al. Identification of serum exosomal hsa-circ-0004771 as a novel diagnostic biomarker of colorectal cancer. Front Genet. 2019;10:1096.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Vychytilova-Faltejskova P, Stitkovcova K, Radova L, et al. Circulating PIWI-interacting RNAs piR-5937 and piR-28876 are promising diagnostic biomarkers of colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018;27(9):1019–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ng EK, Tsui NB, Lam NY, et al. Presence of filterable and nonfilterable mRNA in the plasma of cancer patients and healthy individuals. Clin Chem. 2002;48(8):1212–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsui NB, Jiang P, Wong YF, et al. Maternal plasma RNA sequencing for genome-wide transcriptomic profiling and identification of pregnancy-associated transcripts. Clin Chem. 2014;60(7):954–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Xue VW, Cheung MT, Chan PT, et al. Non-invasive potential circulating mRNA markers for colorectal adenoma using targeted sequencing. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):12943.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

  11. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol). 1995;57(1):289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tang ZF, Li CW, Kang BX, Gao G, Li C, Zhang ZM. GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(W1):W98–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Luo HY, Zhao Q, Wei W, et al. Circulating tumor DNA methylation profiles enable early diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and screening for colorectal cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(524):eaax7533.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li WY, Li QJ, Kang SL, et al. CancerDetector: ultrasensitive and non-invasive cancer detection at the resolution of individual reads using cell-free DNA methylation sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(15):e89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen JD, Li L, Wang Y, et al. Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test. Science (New York, NY). 2018;359(6378):926–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Taguchi A, Rho JH, Yan Q, et al. MAPRE1 as a plasma biomarker for early-stage colorectal cancer and adenomas. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2015;8(11):1112–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, et al. Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(14):1287–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Y, Sethi NS, Hinoue T, et al. Comparative molecular analysis of gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. Cancer Cell. 2018;33(4):721-735.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Matheu A, Collado M, Wise C, et al. Oncogenicity of the developmental transcription factor Sox9. Cancer Res. 2012;72(5):1301–15. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Qian Y, Xia S, Feng Z. Sox9 mediated transcriptional activation of FOXK2 is critical for colorectal cancer cells proliferation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;483(1):475–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou T, Wu L, Ma N, et al. SOX9-activated FARSA-AS1 predetermines cell growth, stemness, and metastasis in colorectal cancer through upregulating FARSA and SOX9. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(12):1071. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-03273-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu Y, Zhang X, Hu X, et al. The effects of lncRNA MALAT1 on proliferation, invasion and migration in colorectal cancer through regulating SOX9. Mol Med. 2018;24(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-018-0050-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Liang X, Duronio GN, Yang Y, et al. An enhancer-driven stem cell-like program mediated by SOX9 blocks intestinal differentiation in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(1):209–22. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.044.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hosseini A, Mirzaei A, Salimi V, et al. The local and circulating SOX9 as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of primary bone cancer. J Bone Oncol. 2020;31(23): 100300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shen M, Dong C, Ruan X, et al. Chemotherapy-induced extracellular vesicle miRNAs promote breast cancer stemness by targeting ONECUT2. Cancer Res. 2019;79(14):3608–21. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-4055.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Khor TO, Gul YA, Ithnin H, et al. A comparative study of the expression of Wnt-1, WISP-1, survivin and cyclin-D1 in colorectal carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;21(4):291–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0002-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu Y, Li W, Yang Y, et al. WISP1 indicates poor prognosis and regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis in gastric cancer via targeting AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Am J Transl Res. 2020;12(11):7297–311.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang LH, Wang Y, Fan QQ, et al. Up-regulated Wnt1-inducible signaling pathway protein 1 correlates with poor prognosis and drug resistance by reducing DNA repair in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(38):5814–25. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i38.5814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang S, Chong ZZ, Shang YC, et al. WISP1 (CCN4) autoregulates its expression and nuclear trafficking of β-catenin during oxidant stress with limited effects upon neuronal autophagy. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2012;9(2):91–101. https://doi.org/10.2174/156720212800410858.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gaudreau PO, Clairefond S, Class CA, et al. WISP1 is associated to advanced disease, EMT and an inflamed tumor microenvironment in multiple solid tumors. Oncoimmunology. 2019;8(5): e1581545. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2019.1581545.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Research Grants Council HK and HK Innovation and Technology Fund University-Industry Collaborative Programme (RGCQ71P and UIM/354), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (82103438).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SCCW contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by VWX and SCCW, and YKEW and HFT processed the patient samples and technical work before sequencing library preparation. SSMN, HTW, WWL, and YNW gave invaluable comments on the subject recruitment and data interpretation. ACSY and AKYY advised bioinformatic analysis. WCSC and WCST gave invaluable comments on data analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by VWX and SCCW, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sze Chuen Cesar Wong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong and New Territories Easter Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (CREC Ref. No.: 2014.224).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xue, V.W., Ng, S.S.M., Tsang, H.F. et al. The non-invasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer via a SOX9-based gene panel. Clin Exp Med 23, 2421–2432 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-022-00970-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-022-00970-6

Keywords

Navigation