Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Static versus dynamic gerbil tympanic membrane elasticity: derivation of the complex modulus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An accurate estimation of tympanic membrane stiffness is important for realistic modelling of middle ear mechanics. Tympanic membrane stiffness has been investigated extensively under either quasi-static or dynamic loading conditions. It is known that biological tissues are sensitive to strain rate. Therefore, in this work, the mechanical behaviour of the tympanic membrane was studied under both quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions. Experiments were performed on the pars tensa of four gerbil tympanic membranes. A custom-built indentation apparatus was used to perform in situ tissue indentations and testing was done applying both quasi-static and dynamic sinusoidal indentations up to 8.2 Hz. The unloaded shape of the tympanic membrane was measured and used to create specimen-specific finite element models to simulate the experiments. The frequency dependent Young’s modulus of each specimen was then estimated by an inverse analysis in which the error between experimental and simulated indentation data was optimised for each indentation frequency separately. Using an 8 μm central region thickness, we found Young’s moduli between 71 and 106 MPa (n = 4) at 0.2 Hz indentation frequency. A standard linear viscoelastic model and a viscoelastic model with a continuous relaxation spectrum were used to derive a complex modulus in the frequency domain. Due to experimental limitations, the indentation frequency upper limit was 8.2 Hz. The average relative modulus increase in this domain was 14% and the increase was the strongest below 6 Hz.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aernouts J, Dirckx JJJ (2011) Elastic characterization of the gerbil pars flaccida from in situ inflation experiments. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 10: 727–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aernouts J, Couckuyt I, Crombecq K, Dirckx JJJ (2010) Elastic characterization of membranes with a complex shape using point indentation measurements and inverse modelling. Int J Eng Sci 48: 599–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aernouts J, Soons JAM, Dirckx JJJ (2010) Quantification of tympanic membrane elasticity parameters from in situ point indentation measurements: validation and preliminary study. Hear Res 263: 177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Békésy G (1960) Experiments in hearing. McGraw-Hill, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Buytaert J, Dirckx J (2010) Phase-shifting moire topography using optical demodulation on liquid crystal matrices. Opt Lasers Eng 48: 172–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai H, Jackson R, Steele C, Puria S (2010) A biological gear in the human middle ear. In: Proceedings of the COMSOL conference 2010, Boston

  • Cheng JT, Aarnisalo AA, Harrington E, Hernandez-Montes MDS, Furlong C, Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ (2010) Motion of the surface of the human tympanic membrane measured with stroboscopic holography. Hear Res 263(1–2): 66–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng T, Dai C, Gan R (2007) Viscoelastic properties of human tympanic membrane. Ann Biomed Eng 35: 305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daphalapurkar NP, Dai C, Gan RZ, Lu H (2009) Characterization of the linearly viscoelastic behavior of human tympanic membrane by nanoindentation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2: 82–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decraemer W, Funnell W (2008) Chronic otitis media. Pathogenesis-oriented therapeutic management, Kugler Publications, The Hague, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, chap Anatomical and mechanical properties of the tympanic membrane, pp 51–84

  • Decraemer W, Maes M, Vanhuyse V, Vanpeperstraete P (1980) A non-linear viscoelastic constitutive equation for soft biological tissues, based upon a structural model. J Biomech 13: 559–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decraemer WF, Maes MA, Vanhuyse VJ (1980) An elastic stress-strain relation for soft biological tissues based on a structural model. J Biomech 13(6): 463–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirckx JJ, Decraemer WF (1992) Area change and volume displacement of the human tympanic membrane under static pressure. Hear Res 62(1): 99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirckx JJ, Decraemer WF (2001) Effect of middle ear components on eardrum quasi-static deformation. Hear Res 157(1–2): 124–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkhouri N, Liu H, Funnell W (2006) Low-frequency finite-element modelling of the gerbil middle ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 7: 399–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay J, Puria S, Decraemer W, Steele C (2005) Three approaches for estimating the elastic modulus of the tympanic membrane. J Biomech 38: 1807–1815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay JP, Puria S, Steele CR (2006) The discordant eardrum. PNAS 103: 19,743–19,748

    Google Scholar 

  • Findley WN, Lai JS, Onaron K (1976) Creep and relaxation of nonlinear viscoelastic materials. North-Holland, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fung Y (1981) Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan R, Sun Q, Feng B, Wood M (2006) Acoustic-structural coupled finite element analysis for sound transmission in human ear—pressure distributions. Med Eng Phys 28: 395–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorissen D, Crombecq K, Couckuyt I, Demeester P, Dhaene T (2010) A surrogate modeling and adaptive sampling toolbox for computer based design. J Mach Learn Res 11: 2051–2055

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesabgar SM, Marshall H, Agrawal SK, Samani A, Ladak HM (2010) Measuring the quasi-static young’s modulus of the eardrum using an indentation technique. Hear Res 263(1-2): 168–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirikae I (1960) The structure and function of the middle ear. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuypers L, Decraemer W, Dirckx J (2005) Thickness distribution of fresh and preserved human eardrums measured with confocal microscopy. Otol Neurotol 27: 256–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuypers LC, Dirckx JJJ, Decraemer WF, Timmermans JP (2005) Thickness of the gerbil tympanic membrane measured with confocal microscopy. Hear Res 209(1–2): 42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladak HM, Decraemer WF, Dirckx JJJ, Funnell WRJ (2004) Response of the cat eardrum to static pressures: mobile versus immobile malleus. J Acous Soc Am 116(5): 3008–3021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim DJ (1968) Tympanic membrane. Electron microscopic observation. Part i: pars tensa. Acta Oto-Laryngol 66(3): 181–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo H, Dai C, Gan RZ, Lu H (2009) Measurement of young’s modulus of human tympanic membrane at high strain rates. J Biomech Eng 131:064,501–1.8

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubert HKP (1963) A simple model representing internal damping in solid materials. Aeronaut Q 14: 187–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosowski JJ, Ravicz ME, Teoh SW, Flandermeyer D (1999) Measurements of middle-ear function in the mongolian gerbil, a specialized mammalian ear. Audiol Neuro-Otol 4(3–4): 129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonndorf J, Khanna SM (1972) Tympanic-membrane vibrations in human cadaver ears studied by time-averaged holography. J Acoust Soc Am 52(4): 1221–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Chen HY, Kassab GS (2007) A rate-insensitive linear viscoelastic model for soft tissues. Biomaterials 28(24): 3579–3586

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jef Aernouts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aernouts, J., Dirckx, J.J.J. Static versus dynamic gerbil tympanic membrane elasticity: derivation of the complex modulus. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 11, 829–840 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-011-0355-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-011-0355-6

Keywords

Navigation