Skip to main content
Log in

Finite element implementation of a generalized Fung-elastic constitutive model for planar soft tissues

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerical simulations of the anisotropic mechanical properties of soft tissues and tissue-derived biomaterials using accurate constitutive models remain an important and challenging research area in biomechanics. While most constitutive modeling efforts have focused on the characterization of experimental data, only limited studies are available on the feasibility of utilizing those models in complex computational applications. An example is the widely utilized exponential constitutive model proposed by Fung. Although present in the biomechanics literature for several decades, implementation of this model into finite element (FE) simulations has been limited. A major reason for limited numerical implementations are problems associated with inherent numerical instability and convergence. To address this issue, we developed and applied two restrictions for a generalized Fung-elastic constitutive model necessary to achieve numerical stability. These are (1) convexity of the strain energy function, and (2) the condition number of material stiffness matrix set lower than a prescribed value. These constraints were implemented in the nonlinear regression used for constitutive model parameter estimation to the experimental biaxial mechanical data. We then implemented the generalized Fung-elastic model into a commercial FE code (ABAQUS, Pawtucket, RI, USA). Single element and multi-element planar biaxial test simulations were conducted to verify the accuracy and robustness of the implementation. Results indicated that numerical convergence and accurate FE implementation were consistently obtained. The present study thus presents an integrated framework for accurate and robust implementation of pseudo-elastic constitutive models for planar soft tissues. Moreover, since our approach is formulated within a general FE code, it can be straightforwardly adopted across multiple software platforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Billiar KL, Sacks MS (2000) Biaxial mechanical properties of the native and glutaraldehyde-treated aortic valve cusp: Part II-A structural constitutive model. J Biomech Eng 122(4):327–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chew PH, Yin FC, Zeger SL (1986) Biaxial stress–strain properties of canine pericardium. J Mol Cell Cardiol 18(6):567–578

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Criscione JC, Humphrey JD, Douglas AD, Hunter WC (2000) An invariant basis for natural strain which yields orthogonal stress response terms in isotropic hyperelasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 48:2445–2465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criscione JC, Sacks MS, Hunter WC (2003a) Experimentally tractable, pseudo-elastic constitutive law for biomembranes: I. Theory. J Biomech Eng 125(1):94–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Criscione JC, Sacks MS, Hunter WC (2003b) Experimentally tractable, pseudo-elastic constitutive law for biomembranes: II. Application. J Biomech Eng 125(1):100–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fung YC (1993) Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung Y, Tong P (eds) (2001) Classical and computational solid mechanics. Advanced series in engineering science. World Scientific Publishing

  • Gardiner JC, Weiss JA (2001) Simple shear testing of parallel-fibered planar soft tissues. J Biomech Eng 123(2):170–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand F (1980) Advanced calculus for applications

  • Holzapfel GA (2000) Nonlinear solid mechanics: a continuum approach for engineering. Wiley, Chichester New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC (2000) A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elasticity 61:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel GA, Eberlein R, Wriggers P, Weizascker HW (1996) Large strain analysis of soft biological membranes: formulatin and finite element analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 132:45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JD (2002) Cardiovascular solid mechanics: cells, tissues, and organs. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JD, Na S (2002) Elastodynamics and arterial wall stress. Ann Biomed Eng 30(4):509–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JD, Vawter DL, Vito RP (1987) Pseudoelasticity of excised visceral pleura. J Biomech Eng 109:115–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JD, Strumpf RK, Yin FC (1990a) Determination of a constitutive relation for passive myocardium: I. A new functional form. J Biomech Eng 112(3):333–339

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JD, Strumpf RK, Yin FC (1990b) Determination of a constitutive relation for passive myocardium: II. Parameter estimation. J Biomech Eng 112(3):340–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JD, Strumpf RK, Yin FCP (1992) A constitutive theory for biomembranes: application to epicardial mechanics. J Biomech Eng 114:461–466

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriacou SK, Shah AD, Humphrey JD (1997) Inverse finite element characterization of nonlinear hyperelastic membranes. J Appl Mech 64(June):257–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanir Y (1994) Plausibility of structural constitutive equations for isotropic soft tissues in finite static deformations. J Appl Mech 61:695–702

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanir Y (1996) Plausibility of structural constitutive equations for swelling tissues—implications of the C–N and S–E conditions. J Biomech Eng 118:10–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lanir Y, Lichtenstein O, Imanuel O (1996) Optimal design of biaxial tests for structural material characterization of flat tissues. J Biomech Eng 118:41–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden JE, Hughes TJR (1983) Mathematical foundations of elasticity. Dover, Don Mills

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen PMF, Hunter PJ, Smaill BH (1991) Biaxial testing of membrane biomaterials: testing equipment and procedures. J Biomech Eng 113:295–300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden RW (1997) Non-linear elastic deformations. Dover, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden R (2003) Nonlinear elasticity, anisotropy, material stability, and residual stresses in soft tissue. In: Ogden R (ed) Biomechanics of soft tissue in cardiovascular system. Springer, New York

  • Sacks MS (1999) A method for planar biaxial mechanical testing that includes in-plane shear. J Biomech Eng 121(5):551–555

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks MS (2000) Biaxial mechanical evaluation of planar biological materials. J Elasticity 61:199–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks MS (2003) Incorporation of experimentally-derived fiber orientation into a structural constitutive model for planar collagenous tissues. J Biomech Eng 125(2):280–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks MS, Chuong CJ (1998) Orthotropic mechanical properties of chemically treated bovine pericardium. Ann Biomed Eng 26(5):892–902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks MS, Sun W (2003) Multiaxial mechanical behavior of biological materials. Annu Rev Biomed Eng

  • Schroder J, Neff P (2003) Aspects of formulation of hyperelastic soft tissues with polyconvex anisotropic strain energies. Second MIT conference on computational fluid and solid mechanics. MIT, Cambridge MA

  • Sun W, Sacks MS, Sellaro TL, Slaughter WS, Scott MJ (2003) Biaxial mechanical response of bioprosthetic heart valve biomaterials to high in-plane shear. J Biomech Eng 125:372–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun W, Scott MJ, Sacks MS (2005) Effects of boundary conditions on the planar biaxial mechanical properties of soft tissues. ASME J Biomech Eng (in press)

  • Tong P, Fung YC (1976) The stress–strain relationship for the skin. J Biomech 9(10):649–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Truesdell C, Noll W (1965) The Nonlinear Field Theories. Handbuch der Physik. S Flugge. Springer, Berlin, pp 119–126

  • Weiss JA, Maker BN, Govindjee S (1996) Finite element implementation of incompressible, transversely isotropic hyperelasticity. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 135:107–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber JP, Walton JR (2002) The convexity properties of a class of constitutive models for biological soft tissues. Math Mech Solids 7:217–236

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this work was provided by NSF Grant BES-9978858, NIH Grant R01-HL071814-01A1 and by Edwards Lifesciences, Inc. MSS is an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Michael J. Scott for his practical insights into the present work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. Sacks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, W., Sacks, M.S. Finite element implementation of a generalized Fung-elastic constitutive model for planar soft tissues. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 4, 190–199 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-005-0075-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-005-0075-x

Keywords

Navigation