Skip to main content
Log in

An examination of the rheology of flocculated clay suspensions

  • Published:
Ocean Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A dense cohesive sediment suspension, sometimes referred to as fluid mud, is a thixotropic fluid with a true yield stress. Current rheological formulations struggle to reconcile the structural dynamics of cohesive sediment suspensions with the equilibrium behaviour of these suspensions across the range of concentrations and shear. This paper is concerned with establishing a rheological framework for the range of sediment concentrations from the yield point to Newtonian flow. The shear stress equation is based on floc fractal theory, put forward by Mills and Snabre (1988). This results in a Casson-like rheology equation. Additional structural dynamics is then added, using a theory on the self-similarity of clay suspensions proposed by Coussot (1995), giving an equation which has the ability to match the equilibrium and time-dependent viscous rheology of a wide range of suspensions of different concentration and mineralogy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandrou AN, Constantinou N, Georgiou G (2009) Shear rejuvenation, aging and shear banding in yield stress fluids. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 158:6–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amjad H, Khan Z (2016) A comparison of fractal dimensions of clay and humic acid flocs under optimum coagulation conditions. In J Environ Sci Dev 7(4):240–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio P, Pérez-Bernal JL, Galán E, Bello MA (2004) Kaolin fractal dimension: comparison with other properties. Clay Miner 39:750–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armelin E, Martí M, Rudé E, Alemán C (2006) A simple model to describe the thixotropic behavior of paints. Progress in Organic Coatings 57(3):229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong MJ, Beris AN, Rogers SA, Wagner NJ (2016) Dynamic shear rheology of a thixotropic suspension: comparison of an improved structure-based model with large amplitude oscillatory shear experiments. J Rheol 60:433–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bache DH, Gregory R (2007) Flocs in water treatment. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkour K, Leyama M, Benchabane A, Scivener O (2005) Time-dependent rheological behaviour of bentonite suspensions. J Rheol 49(6):1329–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlamont J, Ockenden M, Toorman E, Winterwerp J (1993) The characterisation of cohesive sediment properties. Coast Eng 21:105–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blachier C, Jacquet A, Mosquet M, Michot L, Baravian C (2013) Impact of claymineral particle morphology on the rheological properties of dispersions: a combined X-ray scattering, transmission electronic microscopy and flow rheology study. Appl Clay Sci 87:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell B C (2013) Thixotropic-viscoelastic rheological fingerprints in large amplitude oscillatory shear, Masters Thesis for the University Illinois, 2013

  • Bremer L G B (1992) Fractal aggregation in relation to formation and properties of particle gels, PhD Thesis for the University of Wageningen, 1992

  • Chong JS, Christiansen EB, Baer AD (1971) Rheology of concentrated suspensions. J Appl Polym Sci 15:2007–2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coupland JN and Sigfusson H (2006) Food emulsions, In: (Ed) Yiu H Hui, Handbook of Food Science, Technology, and Engineering, Volume 3, 138–1 to 138–11

  • Coussot P (1993) Rheology of concentrated dispersed systems in a low molecular weight matrix. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 46:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coussot P (1995) Structural similarity and transition from Newtonian to non-Newtonian behavior for clay-water suspensions. Phys Rev Lett 74(20):3971–3974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coussot P, Nguyen QD, Huynh HT, Bonn D (2002) Avalanche behavior in yield stress fluids. Phys Rev Lett 88(17):175501-1–175501-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derjaguin B, Muller V, Toporov Y (1975) Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 53:314

  • Dullaert K, Mewis J (2006) A structural kinetics model for thixotropy. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 139:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth BA, Hunter RJ (1976) Flow properties of coagulated colloidal suspensions: III the elastic floc model. J Colloid Interface Sci 57(2):266–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galindo-Rosale FJ, Rubio-Hernández FJ (2006) Structural breakdown and build-up in bentonite dispersions. Appl Clay Sci 33:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genovese DB (2012) Shear rheology of hard-sphere, dispersed and aggregated suspensions and filler-matric composites. Adv Colloid Interf Sci. 171–172:1–16

  • Gratiot N and Manning A J (2008) Flocculation processes in concentrated benthic suspension layer using a laboratory diffusive turbulent grid tank, In: T Kusuda, Y Hiroyuki, J Spearman, J Z Gailani (eds), Sediment and Ecohydraulics: INTERCOH 2005, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

  • Hammadi L, Boundjenane N, Houdjedje R, Reffis R, Belhadri M (2015) Modeling the time-dependent rheological behaviour of clays used in fabrication of ceramic, International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial. Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering 9(7):1373–1376

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendratta LA and Ohmoto T (2012) Non-newtonian properties and flow structure in hyper-concentrated sediment laden flows, Annals of Faculty Engineering Hunedoara - International Journal ofd Engineering, Tome X, Fascicule 3, ISSN 1584-2673, 57–62

  • Hill L J, Sparks R S J and Rougier J C (2013) Risk assessment and uncertainty in natural hazards, In: J Rougier, S Sparks and L Hill (eds), Risk and Uncertainty Assessment for Natural Hazards, Cambridge University Press

  • Huang H (1993) Porosity-size relationship of drilling mud flocs: fractal structure. Clay and Clay Minerals 41(3):373–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kessel T (1996) Rheological properties of cohesive sediment suspensions, report no. 1–96, Technical University of Delft, March 1996.

  • Khelifa A and Hill PS (2006) Models for effective density and settling velocity of flocs. J Hydraul Res 44(3):390–401

  • Knoch D and Malcherek A (2011) A numerical model for simulation of fluid mud with different rheological behaviors, Ocean Dynamics;Mar2011, Vol. 61 Issue 2/3, p245.

  • Krieger IM and Dougherty T J (1959) A mechanism for non-Newtonian flow in suspensions of rigid spheres. Trans. Soc. Rheol., III:137–152

  • Maggi F (2005) Flocculation dynamics of cohesive sediment. Doctoral Thesis for the Technical, University of Delft

  • Maggi F (2007) Variable fractal dimension: a major control for floc structure and flocculation kinemativs of suspended cohesive sediment. J Geophys Res 112(C7). doi:10.1029/2006JC003951

  • Manning A J, Baugh J V, Spearman J and Whitehouse R J S (2011) Cohesive sediment flocculation and the application to settling flux modelling, In: Sediment transport. Intech, Vienna, Austria. http://www.intechopen.com/books/sediment-transport/cohesive-sediment-flocculation-and-the-application-to-settling-flux-modelling

  • Markussen TN and Andersen TJ (2013) A simple method for calculating in situ floc settling velocities based on effective density functions. Mar Geol 344:10–18

  • McClements DK (1999) Food emulsions, principles, practice and technique. CRC Press LLC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Metin CO, Bonnecaze RT, Lake LW, Miranda CR, Nguyen QP (2014) Aggregation kinetics and shear rheology of aqueous silica suspensions. Appl Nanosci 4(2):169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills P (1985) Non-newtonian behaviour of floc suspensions. J Physique Lett 46:301–409

  • Mills P and Snabre P (1988). The fractal concept in the rheology of concentrated suspensions, p.105–108. In: Giesekus H. et al. (Eds.). Progress and Trends in Rheology II, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Moller P, Fall A, Chikkadi V, Derks D, Bonn D (2009) An attempt to categorize yield stress fluid behaviour. Phil Trans R Soc A 367:5139–5155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller PCF, Mewis J, Bonn D (2006) Yield stress and thixotropy: on the difficulty of measuring yield stresses in practice. Soft Matter 2:274–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondragon R, Julià JE, Barba A, Jarque JC (2012) Determination of the packing fraction of silica nano particles from the rheological and viscoelastic measurements of nanofluids. Chem Eng Sci 80:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore F (1959) The rheology of ceramic slips and bodies. Trans Brit Ceramic Soc 58:470–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberrecht D, Wurpts A (2014) Investigations of rheological flow properties based on lab data of fluid mud samples and an extended model approach. Die Küste 8:455–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Pignon F, Magnin A, Piau J-M, Cabane B, Lindner P, Diat O (1997) Yield stress thixotropic clay suspension: investigations of structure by light, neutron, and x-ray scattering, Physical Review E. Volume 56(3):3281–3289

    Google Scholar 

  • Pignon F, Magnin A, Piau J-M (1998) Structure under shear flow of thixotropic clay gels, proceedings of SASFLOW '98, may 1998. Grenoble, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Quemada D (1977) Rheology of concentrated disperse systems and minimum energy dissipation principle—I. Viscosity concentration relationship. Rheologica Acta 16(82–94):1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Quemada D (1998) Rheological modelling of complex fluids: I. The concept of effective volume fraction revisited. Eur Phys J AP 1:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snabre P, Bitbol M, Mills P (1987) Cell disaggregation behaviour in shear flow. J Biophys 51:795–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Souza MPR (2011) Thixotropic elasto-viscoplastic model for structured fluids. Soft Matter 7:2471–2483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Souza MPR, Thompson RL (2013) A unified approach to model elasto-viscoplastic thixotropic yield stress materials and apparent yield stress fluids. Rheol Acta 52(7):673–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toorman E (1997) Modelling the thixotropic behaviour of dense cohesive sediment suspensions. Rheol Acta 36:56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Olphen H (1956) Forces between suspended bentonite particles, clays and clay minerals, Natl. Acad.Sci., Natl.Res.Coun.pub., 2040224.

  • Willenbacher N and Georgieva K (2013) Rheology of disperse systems, In: Product Design and Engineering: Formulation of Gels and Pastes, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co, 2013

  • Winterwerp JC, van Kesteren WGM (2004) Introduction to the physics of cohesive sediment in marine environment. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall WE, Tuliani S (1964) Viscosity changes during the ageing of clay-water suspensions. Trans Brit Ceramic Soc 63:167–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C and Dong P (2016) A dynamic model for coastal mud flocs with distributed fractal dimension, Journal of Coastal Research, http://www.jcronline.org/doi/pdf/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-15-00110.1 . Accessed 1 Nov 2016

  • Zhou Z, Solomon MJ, Scales PJ, Bodger DV (1999) The yield stress of concentrated flocculated suspensions of size distributed particles. J Rheol 43:651–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy Spearman.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Erik A Toorman

This article is part of the Topical Collection on the 13th International Conference on Cohesive Sediment Transport in Leuven, Belgium 7–11 September 2015

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spearman, J. An examination of the rheology of flocculated clay suspensions. Ocean Dynamics 67, 485–497 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-017-1041-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-017-1041-8

Keywords

Navigation