Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of young students’ prior attitude on source consideration when watching videos on controversial topics. Two hundred seventy-one seventh graders watched a series of videos in which two interviewees (one expert in the field, one layperson) expressed divergent positions on a socioscientific issue (“Will organic farming be able to feed the entire world population by 2050?”). After watching the videos, students were asked to recall the identity and arguments of the interviewees and indicate how far they had perceived them to be credible and convincing. If no effect of students’ prior attitude was found on source recall, students were prompt to judge the interviewee who provided arguments that were congruent with their prior attitude as more credible and convincing that the interviewee that provided incongruent arguments. These results suggest that young students’ beliefs contribute to their assessment of the credibility of an information source when watching videos.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
On request.
References
Allgaier, J. (2019). Science and environmental communication via online video: Strategically distorted communications on climate change and climate engineering on YouTube. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00036
Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., Florit, E., & Mason, L. (2022). The role of individual differences in sourcing: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 749–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09640-7
Bardin, L. (2013). L’analyse de contenu [Content Analysis]. Presses Universitaires de France.
Bassili, J. N. (2008). Attitude strength. In W. D. Crano & R. Prislin (Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology. Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 237–260). Psychology Press.
Booth-Butterfield, S., & Gutowski, C. (1993). Message modality and source credibility can interact to affect argument processing. Communication Quarterly, 41(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369869
Braasch, J. L., & Bråten, I. (2017). The discrepancy-induced source comprehension (D-ISC) model: Basic assumptions and preliminary evidence. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1323219
Braasch, J. L., Lawless, K. A., Goldman, S. R., Manning, F. H., Gomez, K. W., & MacLeod, S. M. (2009). Evaluating search results: An empirical analysis of middle school students’ use of source attributes to select useful sources. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.1.c
Braasch, J. L., Rouet, J. F., Vibert, N., & Britt, M. A. (2012). Readers’ use of source information in text comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 40(3), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0160-6
Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2018). Sourcing in text comprehension: A review of interventions targeting sourcing skills. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 773–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9421-7
Bråten, I., Salmerón, L., & Strømsø, H. I. (2016). Who said that? Investigating the plausibility-induced source focusing assumption with Norwegian undergraduate readers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.07.004
Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1983). Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.241
De Pereyra, G. (2016). Lecture et compréhension de textes contradictoires par les adolescents : représentation et prise en compte des sources d'information. [Thèse de doctorat - Université de Poitiers]. http://theses.fr/s101218.
DeBono, K. G., & Harnish, R. J. (1988). Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(4), 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.541
Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2020). car: Companion to Applied Regression. [R package]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=car.
Goldman, S. R. (2011). Choosing and using multiple information sources: Some new findings and emergent issues. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 238–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.006
Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (8th ed.). Wadsworth.
Holland, B. S., & Copenhaver, M. D. (1988). Improved Bonferroni-type multiple testing procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.145
Kammerer, Y., Kalbfell, E., & Gerjets, P. (2016). Is this information source commercially biased? How contradictions between web pages stimulate the consideration of source information. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 430–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2016.1169968
Kobayashi, K. (2014). Students’ consideration of source information during the reading of multiple texts and its effect on intertextual conflict resolution. Instructional Science, 42(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9276-3
Kumkale, G. T., Albarracín, D., & Seignourel, P. J. (2010). The effects of source credibility in the presence or absence of prior attitudes: Implications for the design of persuasive communication campaigns. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(6), 1325–1356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00620.x
Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., ... & Schudson, M. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
Lenth, R. (2020). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. [R package]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=emmeans.
Macedo-Rouet, M., Braasch, J. L., Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J. F. (2013). Teaching fourth and fifth graders to evaluate information sources during text comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.769995
Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2013). Text belief consistency effects in the comprehension of multiple texts with conflicting information. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.769997
McCroskey, J. C. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637756609375482
Miller, V. (2020). Understanding digital culture. Sage Publications Limited.
Paul, J., Macedo-Rouet, M., Rouet, J. F., & Stadtler, M. (2017). Why attend to source information when reading online? The perspective of ninth grade students from two different countries. Computers & Education, 113, 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.020
Paul, J., Cerdán, R., Rouet, J. F., & Stadtler, M. (2018). Exploring fourth graders’ sourcing skills/ Un análisis de la capacidad de escrutinio sobre las fuentes de información de los estudiantes de cuarto grado. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 41(3), 536–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2018.1480458
Pérez, A., Potocki, A., Stadtler, M., Macedo-Rouet, M., Paul, J., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J. F. (2018). Fostering teenagers’ assessment of information reliability: Effects of a classroom intervention focused on critical source dimensions. Learning and Instruction, 58, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.006
Perloff, R. M. (2017). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the twenty-first century. Routledge.
Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
Potocki, A., de Pereyra, G., Ros, C., Macedo-Rouet, M., Stadtler, M., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J. F. (2020). The development of source evaluation skills during adolescence: Exploring different levels of source processing and their relationships (El desarrollo de las habilidades de evaluación de las fuentes durante la adolescencia: Una exploración de los distintos niveles de procesamiento de las fuentes y sus relaciones). Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 43(1), 19–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2019.1690848
Richter, T., & Maier, J. (2017). Comprehension of multiple documents with conflicting information: A two-step model of validation. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1322968
Rouet, J. F., Le Bigot, L., de Pereyra, G., & Britt, M. A. (2016). Whose story is this? Discrepancy triggers readers’ attention to source information in short narratives. Reading and Writing, 29(8), 1549–1570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9625-0
Salmerón, L., Macedo-Rouet, M., & Rouet, J. F. (2016). Multiple viewpoints increase students’ attention to source features in social question and answer forum messages. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2404–2419. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23585
Salmerón, L., Sampietro, A., & Delgado, P. (2020). Using Internet videos to learn about controversies: Evaluation and integration of multiple and multimodal documents by primary school students. Computers & Education, 148, 103796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103796
Saux, G., Britt, A., Le Bigot, L., Vibert, N., Burin, D., & Rouet, J. F. (2017). Conflicting but close: Readers’ integration of information sources as a function of their disagreement. Memory & Cognition, 45(1), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0644-5
Saux, G., Ros, C., Britt, M. A., Stadtler, M., Burin, D. I., & Rouet, J. F. (2018). Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands. Discourse Processes, 55(5–6), 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1463722
Schroeder, J., Kardas, M., & Epley, N. (2017). The humanizing voice: Speech reveals, and text conceals, a more thoughtful mind in the midst of disagreement. Psychological Science, 28, 1745–1762. https://doi.org/10.1177/095679761771379
Singmann, H. (2018). afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. [R package]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=afex.
Stiff, J. B., & Mongeau, P. A. (2016). Persuasive communication. Guilford Publications.
Strømsø, H. I. (2017). Multiple models of multiple-text comprehension: A commentary. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1320557
Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Stenseth, T. (2017). The role of students’ prior topic beliefs in recall and evaluation of information from texts on socio-scientific issues. Nordic Psychology, 69(3), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2016.1198270
The jamovi project (2021). jamovi. (Version 2.2) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.
van Strien, J. L., Kammerer, Y., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2016). How attitude strength biases information processing and evaluation on the web. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.057
Wilson, E. J., & Sherrell, D. L. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894421
Funding
This study was conducted as part of the research project “DIMEDD” which was funded by the French Ministry of Education, Higher Education and Research through the PIA (Future Investment Program) call for projects.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Colin Lescarret, PhD (corresponding author) Contact details Email address colin.lescarret@univ-tlse2.fr, Professional address Laboratoire CLLE, Maison de la Recherche, 5 Allées Antonio Machado, 31058 Toulouse Cedex, France.
Current Themes of Research
Students’ Prior Beliefs, Controversial Issues, Processing of Conflicting Information, Learning with Videos
Most Relevant Publications
Lescarret, C., Le Floch, V., Sakdavong, J. C., Boucheix, J. M., Tricot, A., Amadieu, F. (2022). The Impact Of Students’ Prior Attitude On The Processing Of Conflicting Videos: a Comparison Between Middle-School and Undergraduate Students. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00634-9
Julien Magnier
Current Themes of Research
Students’ Prior Beliefs, Controversial Issues, Processing of Conflicting Information, Learning with Videos
Most Relevant Publications
No relevant publications in the field.
Pr. Valérie Le Floch
Current Themes of Research
Attitude Formation and Change, Plausibility Judgment, Causal Attributions
Most Relevant Publications
Lescarret, C., Le Floch, V., Sakdavong, J. C., Boucheix, J. M., Tricot, A., Amadieu, F. (2022). The Impact Of Students’ Prior Attitude On The Processing Of Conflicting Videos: a Comparison Between Middle-School and Undergraduate Students. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00634-9
Jean-Christophe Sakdavong, PhD
Current Themes of Research
Multimedia Learning, e-Learning, Virtual Reality, Video Games Ergonomics.
Most Relevant Publications
Huet, N., Motak, L., & Sakdavong, J. C. (2016). Motivation to seek help and help efficiency in students who failed in an initial task. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 584-593.
Huet, N., Escribe, C., Dupeyrat, C., & Sakdavong, J. C. (2011). The influence of achievement goals and perceptions of online help on its actual use in an interactive learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 413-420.
Pr. Jean-Michel Boucheix
Current Themes of Research
Multimedia Learning, Learning with Videos and Animations, Virtual Reality.
Most Relevant Publications
Boucheix, J. M., Lowe, R. K., Putri, D. K., & Groff, J. (2013). Cueing animations: Dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 71-84.
Boucheix, J. M., & Lowe, R. K. (2010). An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and instruction, 20(2), 123-135.
Boucheix, J. M., & Guignard, H. (2005). What animated illustrations conditions can improve technical document comprehension in young students? Format, signaling and control of the presentation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(4), 369-388.
Pr. Franck Amadieu
Current Themes of Research
Multimedia Learning, Learning with Videos, Cognitive Load.
Most Relevant Publications
Amadieu, F., Lemarié, J., & Tricot, A. (2017). How may multimedia and hypertext documents support deep processing for learning? Psychologie française, 62, 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2015.04.002
Amadieu, F., & Tricot, A. (2014). Apprendre avec le numérique , mythes et réalités. Editions Retz: Paris.
Amadieu, F., Mariné, C. & Laimay, C. (2011). Attention-guiding effect and cognitive load in comprehension of animation. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 36-40.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lescarret, C., Magnier, J., Le Floch, V. et al. “Because I agree with him”: the impact of middle-school students’ prior attitude on the evaluation of source credibility when watching videos. Eur J Psychol Educ 39, 77–104 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00678-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00678-5