Skip to main content
Log in

Designing technology with older people

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Designing applications to support older people in their own homes is increasing in popularity and necessity. The increase in supporting older people in the community means that cash-strapped resources are required to be utilised in the most effective manner, which often lends itself to technology deployment, rather than human deployment as the former is perceived as more cost effective. Therefore, the concern arises as to how technology can be designed inclusively and acceptably to the people who are to receive it. This paper discusses the issue of design, and how these concerns have been addressed in a series of projects targeted towards directly supporting people in the community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bagnall, P., Dewsbury, G., Sommerville, I.: Easy For Everyone: Using components to offer specialised interfaces for software. In: Baxter, G., Dewsbury, G. (eds.) HEAT 2004: Proceedings of the 1st HEAT: The Home and Electronic Assistive Technology Workshop, Computing Department, Lancaster University (2004)

  2. Batterbee, K.: CHI 2003, April 5–10, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA. ACM 1-58113-630-7/03/0004 (2003)

  3. Cheverst, K., Clarke, K., Dewsbury, G., Hemmings, T., Hughes, J., Rouncefield, M.: Design with care: technology, disability and the home. In Harper, R. (ed.) Inside The Smart Home, Chapter 9, pp 63–180. Springer, London (2003)

  4. Clarke, K., Cheverst, K., Dewsbury, G., Fitton, D., Hemmings, T., Hughes, J., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M., Sommerville, I.: Cultural probes: eliciting requirements for dependable ubiquitous computing in the home. In: The 10th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction (HCI International), June 2003

  5. Crabtree, A.: Wild sociology: ethnography and design. Ph.D. Thesis, Lancaster University: Sociology Department (Ref. No. 000479991) (2001)

  6. Dewsbury, G., Sommerville, I., Clarke, K., Rouncefield, M.: A dependability model for domestic systems. In: Anderson S., Felici M., Littlewood, B. (eds.) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security, Proceedings, SAFECOMP. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2788, pp. 103–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

  7. Dewsbury, G., Clarke, K., Rouncefield, M., Sommerville, I.: Depending on digital design: extending inclusivity. Housing Stud. 19(5) (2004a)

  8. Dewsbury , G., Clarke, K., Hemmings, T., Hughes, J., Rouncefield, M., Sommerville, I.: The antisocial model of disability. Disabil. Soc. 19(2) (2004b)

  9. Emerson R.: Observational field work. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 7, 357 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fitton, D., Chevherst, K., Rouncefield, M., Dix, A., Crabtree, A.: Probing technology with technology probes. Equator Workshop on Record and Replay Technologies: Equator IRC

  11. Garfinkel, H.: Ethnomethodology’s program: working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, pX (2002)

  12. Garfinkel, H., Weider, L.: Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. In: Watson, G., Seiler, R. (eds.) Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, p 182. Sage, London (1992)

  13. Gaver, W.H., Dunne, A., Pacenti, E.: Design: cultural probes. Interactions 6(1), 21–29 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., Walker, B.: Cultural Probes and the value of uncertainty, Interactions, Volume XI.5 (2004)

  15. Gheerawo, R.R., Lebbon, C.S.: Inclusive design: developing theory through practice. In: Keates, Langdon, Clarkson, Robinson (eds.) Universal Access and Assistive Technology, pp. 43–52. Springer, London (2002)

  16. Gould, L.C., Walker, A.L., Crane, L.E., Lidz, C.W.: Connections: Notes from the Heroin, World. Yale University Press, New Haven (1974)

  17. Hartswood, M., Procter, R., Slack, R., Voß, A., Buscher, M., Rouncefield, M., Rouchy, P.: Co-realisation: towards a principled synthesis of ethnomethodology and participatory design. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 2002 14(2) (2003)

  18. Isaacs, E., Walendowski, A., Whittaker, S., Schiano, D.J., Candace, K.: The character, functions, and styles of instant messaging in the workplace. CSCW 2002, 16–20 November (2002)

  19. Keates, S., Clarkson, J.: Countering design exclusion: an introduction to inclusive design, p 21. Springer, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kember, S., Cheverst, K., Clarke, K., Dewsbury, G., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M.: Keep taking the medication––assistive technologies for medication regimes in care settings’. In: Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J., Robinson, P. (eds.) Universal Access and Assistive Technology. Springer, London (2002)

  21. Laprie, J.C. (ed.): Dependability: Basic Concepts and Terminology. Springer, New York (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Lebbon, C., Rouncefield, M., Viller, S.: Observation for innovation. In: Clarkson, J., Keates, S., Coleman, R., Lebbon, C. (eds.) Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population. Helen Hamlyn Research Centre, Royal College of Art (2003)

  23. Lindley, C.: Ludic engagement and immersion as a generic paradigm for human–computer interaction design. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Entertainment Computing, Technical University Eindhoven, Netherlands, LNCS, p. 183. Springer, New York, (2004)

  24. Mattelmäki, T., Battarbee, K.: Empathy probes. In: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Malmö Sweden, 23–25 June 2002

  25. Sharrock, W.: Organisational articulation of the design space. In: Moran, T., Carroll J. (eds.) Design Rationale, p. 165. Lawrence Erlbaum (1995)

  26. Sharrock, W.W., Anderson, R.J.: On the demise of the native: some observations on and a proposal for ethnography. Hum. Stud. 5(2), 119–135 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sommerville, I., Dewsbury, G., Clarke, K., Rouncefield, M.: Dependability and trust in organisational and domestic computer systems. In: Clarke, K., Hardstone, G., Rouncefield, M., Sommerville, I. (eds.) Trust in Technology: A Socio-technical Perspective, p. 181. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially funded by Microsoft Research as part of their “Create, Play and Learn” collaborative research programme and partially funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council as part of the DIRC Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration. We would also like to thank the participants from Age Concern Carnforth.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guy Dewsbury.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dewsbury, G., Rouncefield, M., Sommerville, I. et al. Designing technology with older people. Univ Access Inf Soc 6, 207–217 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-007-0079-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-007-0079-7

Keywords

Navigation