Abstract
Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure (DM) and concentrated food processing wastes (FPW) under thermophilic (55 °C) and mesophilic (35 °C) temperatures, and fertilizer value of the effluent were investigated in this study. Two types of influent feedstock were utilized: 100 % DM and a 7:3 mixture (wet weight basis) of DM and FPW. The contents of the FPW, as feedstock were 3:3:3:1 mixture of cheese whey, animal blood, used cooking oil and residue of fried potato. Four continuous digestion experiments were carried out in 10 L digesters. Co-digestion under thermophilic temperature increased methane production per digester volume. However, co-digestion at 35 °C was inhibited. Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (N) recovered after digestion ranged from 73.1 to 91.9 %, while recoveries of ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N) exceeded 100 %. The high recovery of NH4-N was attributed to mineralization of influent organic N. The mixture of DM and FPW showed greater recoveries of NH4-N after digestion compared to DM only, reflecting its greater organic N degradability. The ratios of extractable to total calcium, phosphorus and magnesium were slightly reduced after digestion. These results indicate that co-digestion of DM and FPW under thermophilic temperature enhances methane production and offers additional benefit of organic fertilizer creation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annual Report on the Environment and the Sound Material-Cycle in Japan (2010) Establishing a sound material-cycle society Milestone toward a sound material-cycle society through changes in business and life styles. The Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. http://www.env.go.jp/en/recycle/smcs/a-rep/2010gs_full.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2012
Ward AJ, Hobbs PJ, Holliman PJ, Jones DL (2008) Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour Tehnol 99:7928–7940
Xie S, Lawlor PG, Frost JP, Hu Z, Zhan X (2011) Effect of pig manure to grass silage ratio methane production in batch anaerobic co-digestion of concentrated pig manure and grass silage. Bioresour Tehnol 102:5728–5733
Umetsu K, Takahata H, Takeuchi Y (2000) Farm scale anaerobic digester of dairy manure slurry in a cold region. J Soc Agric Struct Jpn 31(3):179–185
El-Mashad HM, Zhang RH (2010) Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Bioresour Technol 101:4021–4028
Neves L, Oliveira R, Alves MM (2009) Co-digestion of cow manure, food waste and intermittent input of fat. Bioresour Tehnol 100:1957–1962
Pereira MA, Cavaleiro AJ, Mota M, Alves MM (2003) Accumulation of long chain fatty acids onto anaerobic sludge under steady state and shock loading conditions: effect on acetogenic and methanogenic activity. Water Sci Technol 48(6):33–40
Mshandete A, Kivaisi A, Rubindayayugi M, Mattiasson B (2004) Anaerobic batch co-digestion of sisal pulp and fish wastes. Bioresour Technol 95(1):19–24
Parawira W, Murto M, Zvauya R, Mattiasson B (2004) Anaerobic batch digestion of solid potato waste alone and in combination with sugar beet leaves. Renew Energy 29:1811–1823
Convers JC, Graves RE, Evans GW (1977) Anaerobic degradation of dairy manure under mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. Trans ASAE 20(2):336–340
Hashimoto AG (1983) Conversion of straw-manure mixture to methane at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. Biotechnol Bioeng 25:185–200
Kimura Y, Umetsu K, Takahata H (1994) Effects of methane fermentation on seed survival of Broadleaf dock (in Japanese). J Jpn Soc Grassl Sci 40(2):165–170
Alvarez R, Liden G (2008) Semi-continuous co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste, manure, and fruit and vegetable waste. Renew Energy 33:726–734
Callaghan FJ, Wase DAJ, Thayanithy K, Forster CF (2002) Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure. Biomass Bioenergy 27:71–77
Cecci F, Pavan P, Mata-Alarez J, Bassetti A, Cozzikino C (1991) Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste: thermophilic versus mesophilic performance at high solids. Waste Manag Res 9:305–315
Gannoun H, Ben Othman N, Bouallagui H, Moktar H (2007) Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastewaters and abattoir wastewaters in an upflow anaerobic filter. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:6737–6743
Chipasa KB, Medrzycka K (2006) Behavior of lipids in biological wastewater treatment processes. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 33(8):635–645
Kabouris JC, Tezel U, Pavlostathis SG, Englemann M, Dulaney JA, Todd AC, Gillete RA (2009) Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of municipal sludge and fat, oil, and grease. Water Environ Res 81(5):476–485
Mata-Alvarez J, Mace S, Llabres P (2000) Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 74(1):3–16
Mladenovska Z, Dabrowski S, Ahring BK (2003) Anaerobic digestion of manure and mixture of manure with lipids: biogas reactor performance and microbial community analysis. Water Sci Technol 48(6):271–278
Gallert C, Winter J (1997) Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of source-sorted organic waste: effect of ammonia on glucose degradation and methane production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 48(3):405–410
Lansing S, Martin JF, Botero RB, Nogueira da Silva T, Dias da Silva E (2010) Wastewater transformations and fertilizer value when co-digesting differing ratios of swine manure and used cooking grease in low-cost digesters. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1711–1720
Hokkaido Fertilizer Recommendation Guide (2010). http://www.agri.hro.or.jp/chuo/fukyu/sehiguide2010_index.html. Accessed 26 July 2012
Sahlstrom L (2003) A review of survival of pathogenic bacteria in organic waste used in biogas plants. Bioresour Technol 87:161–166
Olsen JE, Larsen HE (1987) Bacterial decimation times in anaerobic digestions of animal slurries. Biol Wastes 21:153–168
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamashiro, T., Lateef, S.A., Ying, C. et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy cow manure and high concentrated food processing waste. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 15, 539–547 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-012-0110-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-012-0110-9