Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hubble trial: time to stick to basics for treatment of haemorrhoids?

  • Controversies in Colorectal Surgery
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of the Hubble trial, a randomised controlled trial comparing haemorrhoidal artery ligation with rubber band ligation for early-grade prolapsing haemorrhoids, are discussed. The difficulties in defining treatment success are debated along with the trial design highlighting the pitfalls of previous research. A finding that haemorrhoidal artery ligation is not necessarily superior to cheap alternatives has implications for current practice and future commissioning of surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown SR, Tiernan JP, Watson AJM et al (2016) Haemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree haemorrhoids (HubBLe): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388:356–364

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pucher PH, Sodergren MH, Lord AC, Darzi A, Ziprin P (2013) Clinical outcome following Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 15(6):e284–e294. doi:10.1111/codi.12205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, Zaman S, Gravante G (2009) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1665–1671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu H, Yang C, Chen B, Wu J, He H (2015) Clinical outcomes of Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:4932–4939

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nyström PO, Qvist N, Raahave D, Lindsey I, Mortensen N (2010) Randomized clinical trial of symptom control after stapled anopexy or diathermy excision for haemorrhoid prolapse. Br J Surg 97:167–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giordano P, Nastro P, Davies A, Gravante G (2011) Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes. Tech Coloproctol 15:67–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pucher PH, Qurashi M, Howell AM et al (2015) Development and validation of a symptom-based severity score for haemorrhoidal disease: the Sodergren score. Colorectal Dis 17:612–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ratto C, Donisi L, Parello A, Litta F, Zaccone G, De Simone V (2012) Distal Doppler-guided dearterialization’ is highly effective in treating haemorrhoids by transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization. Colorectal Dis 14:e786–e789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schuurman J-P, Rinkes IHMB, Go PMNYH (2012) Hemorrhoidal artery ligation procedure with or without Doppler transducer in grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease. Ann Surg 255:840–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ratto C, Parello A, Veronese E et al (2015) Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for haemorrhoids: results from a multicentre trial. Colorectal Dis 17:O10–O19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu H, Yang C, Chen B, Wu J, He H (2016) Clinical outcomes of Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:4932–4939

    Google Scholar 

  12. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2010) Haemorrhoidal artery ligation (IPG342) 2

  13. Watson AJM, Bruhn H, MacLeod K et al (2014) A pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy to traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 15:439

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. R. Brown.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

In this editorial no research was performed on people or animals.

Informed consent

No informed consent was needed or requested.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, S.R. Hubble trial: time to stick to basics for treatment of haemorrhoids?. Tech Coloproctol 21, 65–67 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1535-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1535-2

Keywords

Navigation