Abstract
Different microsurgical transcranial approaches (MTAs) have been described to expose the posterior surface of the petrous bone (PPB). A quantitative, anatomical comparison of the most used MTAs, for specific areas of the PPB, is not available. Anatomical dissections were performed on five formalin-fixed, latex-injected cadaver heads (10 sides). Six MTAs were analyzed: Kawase approach (KWA), retrosigmoid approach (RSA), retrosigmoid approach with suprameatal extension (RSAS), retrolabyrinthine approach (RLA), translabyrinthine approach (TLA), and transcochlear approach (TCA). Surgical volumes and exposed areas of each approach were quantified with a dedicated neuronavigation system (ApproachViewer, part of GTx-Eyes II, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada) and adjuvant software (ITK-SNAP and Autodesk Meshmixer 3.5). Areas and volumes were compared using linear mixed models. TCA provided the best exposure of Trautmann’s triangle and the retromeatal, suprameatal, meatal, and premeatal regions. RSAs provided the best exposure of the inframeatal region, with RSAS gaining significant exposure of the suprameatal region. KWA had the highest surgical volume, and RLA the lowest. Transpetrosal approaches offer the widest exposure of PPB proportionally to their invasiveness. Retrosigmoid approaches, which get to the studied region through a postero-lateral path, are paramount for the exposure of the inframeatal and suprameatal region and, given the adequate exposure of the remaining PPB, represent an effective approach for the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). These anatomical findings must be considered with approach-related morbidity and the pathological features in order to choose the most appropriate approach in clinical practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.
References
Açar G, Çiçekcibaşı AE (2020) Surgical anatomy of the temporal bone. In G. Sridharan (ed.), Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, IntechOpen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93223
Agosti E, Saraceno G, Qiu J, Buffoli B, Ferrari M, Raffetti E, Belotti F, Ravanelli M, Mattavelli D, Schreiber A, Hirtler L, Rodella LF, Maroldi R, Nicolai P, Gentili F, Kucharczyk W, Fontanella MM, Doglietto F (2020) Quantitative anatomical comparison of transnasal and transcranial approaches to the clivus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 162(3):649–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04152-4
Agosti E, Turri-Zanoni M, Saraceno G, Belotti F, Karligkiotis A, Rocca G, Buffoli B, Raffetti E, Hirtler L, Rezzani R, Rodella LF, Ferrari M, Nicolai P, Bresson D, Herman P, Dallan I, Castelnuovo P, Locatelli D, Fontanella MM, Doglietto F (2021) Quantitative anatomic comparison of microsurgical transcranial, endoscopic endonasal, and transorbital approaches to the spheno-orbital region. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 15;21(6):E494-E505. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opab310
Ambekar S, Amene C, Sonig A, Guthikonda B, Nanda A (2013) Quantitative comparison of retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach and retrosigmoid transtentorial approach: implications for tumors in the petroclival region. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 74(5):300–304. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1348025
Bambakidis NC, Gonzalez LF, Amin-Hanjani S, Deshmukh VR, Porter RW, Daspit PC, Spetzler RF (2005) Combined skull base approaches to the posterior fossa. Technical note. Neurosurg Focus 15;19(2):E8. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2005.19.2.9
Bambakidis NC, Kakarla UK, Kim LJ, Nakaji P, Porter RW, Daspit CP, Spetzler RF (2007) Evolution of surgical approaches in the treatment of petroclival meningiomas: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery 61:202–209. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000303218.61230.39
Bawornvaraporn U, Zomorodi AR, Friedman AH, Fukushima T (2021) Neurosurgical management of petrous bone lesions: classification system and selection of surgical approaches. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 163(10):2895–2907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04934-9
Behari S, Tyagi I, Banerji D, Kumar V, Jaiswal AK, Phadke RV, Jain VK (2010) Postauricular, transpetrosal, presigmoid approach for extensive skull base tumors in the petroclival region: the successes and the travails. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152(10):1633–1645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0701-y
Belotti F, Doglietto F, Schreiber A, Ravanelli M, Ferrari M, Lancini D, Rampinelli V, Hirtler L, Buffoli B, Bolzoni Villaret A, Maroldi R, Rodella LF, Nicolai P, Fontanella MM (2018) Modular classification of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approaches to sellar region: anatomic quantitative study. World Neurosurg 109:e281–e291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.165
Chae R, Rodriguez Rubio R (2020) Anatomy of petrous face. Handb Clin Neurol 170:143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822198-3.00036-7
Chanda A, Nanda A (2006) Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach: advantages and disadvantages from an anatomical perspective. Neurosurgery 59(Suppl 1)ONS1–ONS6. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000220673.79877.30
Chang SW, Wu A, Gore P, Beres E, Porter RW, Preul MC, Spetzler RF, Bambakidis NC (2009) Quantitative comparison of Kawase's approach versus the retrosigmoid approach: implications for tumors involving both middle and posterior fossae. Neurosurgery 64(3 Suppl):ons44–51; discussion ons51–2. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000334410.24984
Cui H, Zhou CF, Bao YH, Wang MS, Wang Y (2016) Extended suboccipital retrosigmoid surgical approach is effective for resection of petrous apex meningioma. J Craniofac Surg 27(5):e429–e433. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002705
Daly MJ, Chan H, Nithiananthan S et al (2011) Clinical implementation of intraoperative cone-beam CT in head and neck surgery. In: medical imaging. visualization, image-guided procedures, and modeling. Bellingham WA: Proc SPIE 7964 6:2011
Drazin D, Wang JM, Alonso F, Patel DM, Granger A, Shoja MM, Loukas M, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS (2017) Intracranial anatomical triangles: a comprehensive illustrated review. Cureus 4;9(10):e1741. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1741
De la Cruz A, Teufert KB (2009) Transcochlear approach to cerebellopontine angle and clivus lesions: indications, results, and complications. Otol Neurotol 30(3):373–380. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819a892b
Delwel E (2008) The anterior transpetrosal-transtentorial approach (Kawase approach). Contemp Neurosurg 30:1–6
DeMonte F, McDermott MW, Al-Mefty O (2011) Al- Mefty’s meningiomas. Thieme Medical Publishers Inc, New York
Doglietto F, Qiu J, Ravichandiran M et al (2017) Quantitative comparison of cranial approaches in the anatomy laboratory: a neuronavigation-based research method. World J Methodol 7:139–147. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v7.i4.139
Doglietto F, Ferrari M, Mattavelli D, Belotti F, Rampinelli V, Kheshaifati H, Lancini D, Schreiber A, Sorrentino T, Ravanelli M, Buffoli B, Hirtler L, Maroldi R, Nicolai P, Rodella LF, Fontanella MM (2018) Transnasal endoscopic and lateral approaches to the clivus: a quantitative anatomic study. World Neurosurg 113:e659–e671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.118
Doglietto F, Belotti F, Qiu J, Roca E, Radovanovic I, Agur A, Kucharczyk W, Schreiber A, Villaret AB, Nicolai P, Gentili F, Fontanella MM (2019) Endonasal and transoral approaches to the craniovertebral junction: a quantitative anatomical study. Acta Neurochir Suppl 125:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62515-7_6
Ebner FH, Koerbel A, Kirschniak A, Roser F, Kaminsky J, Tatagiba M (2007) Endoscope-assisted retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to the middle fossa: anatomical and surgical considerations. Eur J Surg Oncol 33(1):109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2006.09.036
Elhammady MS, Telischi FF, Morcos JJ (2012) Retrosigmoid approach: indications, techniques, and results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 45(2):375–97, ix. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2012.02.001
Ferrari M, Schreiber A, Mattavelli D, Lombardi D, Rampinelli V, Doglietto F, Rodella LF, Nicolai P (2019) Surgical anatomy of the parapharyngeal space: multiperspective, quantification-based study. Head Neck 41(3):642–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.25378
Giammattei L, Passeri T, Abbritti R, Lieber S, Matano F, Le Van T, Okano A, Fava A, Russo PD, Froelich S (2022) Surgical morbidity of the extradural anterior petrosal approach: the Lariboisière experience. J Neurosurg 13:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.3.JNS212962
Hafez A, Nader R, Al-Mefty O (2011) Preservation of the superior petrosal sinus during the petrosal approach. J Neurosurg 114(5):1294–1298. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.6.JNS091461
Hassaan SA, Tamura R, Morimoto Y, Kosugi K, Mahmoud M, Abokerasha A, Moussa A, Toda M, Yoshida K (2020) Surgical outcomes of anterior cerebellopontine angle meningiomas using the anterior transpetrosal approach compared with the lateral suboccipital approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 162(6):1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04236-6
Hirsch BE, Cass SP, Sekhar LN, Wright DC (1993) Translabyrinthine approach to skull base tumors with hearing preservation. Am J Otol 14(6):533–543
Hitselberger WE, Pulec JL (1972) Trigeminal nerve (posterior root) retrolabyrintine selective section-operative procedure for intractable pain. Arch Otolaryngol 96(5):412–415. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1972.00770090644004
Horgan MA, Anderson GJ, Kellogg JX, Schwartz MS, Spektor S, McMenomey SO, Delashaw JB (2000) Classification and quantification of the petrosal approach to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg 93(1):108–112. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.93.1.0108
House WF, De la Cruz A, Hitselberger WE (1978) Surgery of the skull base: transcochlear approach to the petrous apex and clivus. Otolaryngology 86:770–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459987808600522
Hsu FP, Anderson GJ, Dogan A, Finizio J, Noguchi A, Liu KC, McMenomey SO, Delashaw JB Jr (2004) Extended middle fossa approach: quantitative analysis of petroclival exposure and surgical freedom as a function of successive temporal bone removal by using frameless stereotaxy. J Neurosurg 100(4):695–699. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.100.4.0695
Jacquesson T, Berhouma M, Tringali S, Simon E, Jouanneau E (2015) Which routes for petroclival tumors? A comparison between the anterior expanded endoscopic endonasal approach and lateral or posterior routes. World Neurosurg 83(6):929–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.02.003
Jägersberg M, Brodard J, Qiu J, Mansouri A, Doglietto F, Gentili F, Kucharczyk W, Fasel J, Schaller K, Radovanovic I (2017) Quantification of working volumes, exposure, and target-specific maneuverability of the pterional craniotomy and its minimally invasive variants. World Neurosurg 101:710-717.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.011
Jun W, Gao YL, Yu HG, Huang QL, Long XQ, Liu GH, Ting X, Zhong XY, Zhou YF (2020) Comparison of translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma: a meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 196:105994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994
Kawase T, Toya S, Shiobara R, Mine T (1985) Transpetrosal approach for aneurysms of the lower basilar artery. J Neurosurg 63:857–886. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1985.63.6.0857
Muhanna N, Chan H, Qiu J, Daly M, Khan T, Doglietto F, Kucharczyk W, Goldstein DP, Irish JC, de Almeida JR (2018) Volumetric analysis of endoscopic and maxillary swing surgical approaches for nasopharyngectomy. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 79(5):466–474. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1617432
Nguyen-Huynh AT, Jackler RK, Pfister M, Tseng J (2007) The aborted early history of the translabyrinthine approach: a victim of suppression or technical prematurity? Otol Neurotol 28:269e279. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31802b3264
Pyykkö I, Zou J, Gürkov R, Naganawa S, Nakashima T (2019) Imaging of temporal bone. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 82:12–31. https://doi.org/10.1159/000490268
Rhoton AL (2007) Overview of temporal bone. Neurosurgery 61(suppl_4):S4–7–S4–60. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000280024.07630.65
Rhoton AL Jr (2000) The cerebellopontine angle and posterior fossa cranial nerves by the retrosigmoid approach. Neurosurgery 47:S93-129. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200009001-00013
Samii M, Carvalho GA, Tatagiba M, Matthies C, Vorkapic P (1996) Meningiomas of the tentorial notch: surgical anatomy and management. J Neurosurg 84(3):375–381. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.84.3.0375
Samii M, Draf W (1989) Surgery of the skull base. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 386±399
Samii M, Tatagiba M, Carvalho GA (2000) Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to Meckel’s cave and the middle fossa: surgical technique and outcome. J Neurosurg 92(2):235–241. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.92.2.0235
Sanna M, Agarwal M, Jain Y, Russo A, Taibah AK (2003) Transapical extension in difficult cerebellopontine angle tumours: preliminary report. J Laryngol Otol 117(10):788–792. https://doi.org/10.1258/002221503770716214
Saraceno G, Agosti E, Qiu J, Buffoli B, Ferrari M, Raffetti E, Belotti F, Ravanelli M, Mattavelli D, Schreiber A, Hirtler L, Rodella LF, Maroldi R, Nicolai P, Gentili F, Kucharczyk W, Fontanella MM, Doglietto F (2020) Quantitative anatomical comparison of anterior, anterolateral and lateral, microsurgical and endoscopic approaches to the middle cranial fossa. World Neurosurg 134:e682–e730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.178
Sato Y, Mizutani T, Shimizu K, Freund HJ, Samii M (2018) Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal-inframeatal approach for complete surgical removal of a giant recurrent vestibular schwannoma with severe petrous bone involvement: technical case report. World Neurosurg 110:93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.176
Schaller B, Merlo A, Gratzl O, Probst R (1999) Premeatal and retromeatal cerebellopontine angle meningioma. Two distinct clinical entities. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141(5):465–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010050326
Schreiber A, Ferrari M, Rampinelli V, Doglietto F, Belotti F, Lancini D, Ravanelli M, Rodella LF, Fontanella MM, Nicolai P (2017) Modular Endoscopic medial maxillectomies: quantitative analysis of surgical exposure in a preclinical setting. World Neurosurg 100:44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.094
Schreiber A, Mattavelli D, Ferrari M, Rampinelli V, Lancini D, Ravanelli M, Bertazzoni G, Rodella LF, Buffoli B, Doglietto F, Nicolai P (2017) Anterior superior alveolar nerve injury after extended endoscopic medial maxillectomy: a preclinical study to predict neurological morbidity. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 7(10):1014–1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22001
Seoane E, Rhoton AL Jr (1999) Suprameatal extension of the retrosigmoid approach: microsurgical anatomy. Neurosurgery 44:553–560. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199903000-00065
Shibao S, Borghei-Razavi H, Orii M, Yoshida K (2015) Anterior transpetrosal approach combined with partial posterior petrosectomy for petroclival meningiomas with posterior extension. World Neurosurg 84(2):574–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.03.055
Siwanuwatn R, Deshmukh P, Figueiredo EG, Crawford NR, Spetzler RF, Preul MC (2006) Quantitative analysis of the working area and angle of attack for the retrosigmoid, combined petrosal, and transcochlear approaches to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg 104:137–142. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2006.104.1.137
Takuro I, Yukihiro G, Mustaqim P, Takanori F (2020) Resection of the suprameatal tubercle in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 162(5):1089–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04242-8
Tang CT, Kurozumi K, Pillai P, Filipce V, Chiocca EA, Ammirati M (2013) Quantitative analysis of surgical exposure and maneuverability associated with the endoscope and the microscope in the retrosigmoid and various posterior petrosectomy approaches to the petroclival region using computer tomograpy-based frameless stereotaxy. A cadaveric study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115(7):1058–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.10.023
Tang K, Zhou J, Zhou Q, Zhao Y, Liu C (2016) Comparison of subtemporal versus presigmoidal approaches for exposing petrous apex utilizing virtual reality technique. Chin J Contemp Neurol Neurosurg 16:424–428. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2016.07.008
Tubbs RS, Griessenauer C, Loukas M, Ansari SF, Fritsch MH, Cohen-Gadol AA (2014) Trautmann’s triangle anatomy with application to posterior transpetrosal and other related skull base procedures. Clin Anat 27(7):994–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22363
Volovici V, Dammers R, Dirven CMF, Delwel EJ (2020) Conquering the rock-a retrospective single-center experience of the transapical petrosal transtentorial (Kawase) approach: operative technique and impact on cranial nerve function. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 81(5):526–535. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1692485
Wong AK, Stamates MM, Bhansali AP, Shinners M, Wong RH (2017) Radiographic assessment of the presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approach. Surg Neurol Int 27(8):129. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_243_16
Wu CY, Lan Q (2008) Quantification of the presigmoid transpetrosal keyhole approach to petroclival region. Chin Med J (Engl) 20;121(8):740–4
Yang H, Li M, Chen G, Liang J, Bao Y, Li M, Ling F (2021) Using the arcuate eminence-trigeminal notch line to localize the anterior wall of the internal auditory canal in a subtemporal approach: an anatomical study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 82(Suppl 3):e196–e202. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701601
Zanoletti E, Martini A, Emanuelli E, Mazzoni A (2012) Lateral approaches to the skull base. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 32(5):281–287
Zanoletti E, Mazzoni A, Martini A, Abbritti RV, Albertini R, Alexandre E, Baro V, Bartolini S, Bernardeschi D, Bivona R, Bonali M, Borghesi I, Borsetto D, Bovo R, Breun M, Calbucci F, Carlson ML, Caruso A, Cayé-Thomasen P, Cazzador D, Champagne PO, Colangeli R, Conte G, D'Avella D, Danesi G, Deantonio L, Denaro L, Di Berardino F, Draghi R, Ebner FH, Favaretto N, Ferri G, Fioravanti A, Froelich S, Giannuzzi A, Girasoli L, Grossardt BR, Guidi M, Hagen R, Hanakita S, Hardy DG, Iglesias VC, Jefferies S, Jia H, Kalamarides M, Kanaan IN, Krengli M, Landi A, Lauda L, Lepera D, Lieber S, Lloyd SLK, Lovato A, Maccarrone F, Macfarlane R, Magnan J, Magnoni L, Marchioni D, Marinelli JP, Marioni G, Mastronardi V, Matthies C, Moffat DA, Munari S, Nardone M, Pareschi R, Pavone C, Piccirillo E, Piras G, Presutti L, Restivo G, Reznitsky M, Roca E, Russo A, Sanna M, Sartori L, Scheich M, Shehata-Dieler W, Soloperto D, Sorrentino F, Sterkers O, Taibah A, Tatagiba M, Tealdo G, Vlad D, Wu H, Zanetti D (2019) Surgery of the lateral skull base: a 50-year endeavour. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 39(SUPPL. 1):S1-S146. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-39-2019
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Edoardo Agosti, Simona Serioli, and Elena Raffetti. The manuscript was written by Edoardo Agosti, Simona Serioli, Riccardo Draghi, Francesco Doglietto, and reviewed by all authors. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The anatomical study was performed in line principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Simona Serioli, Edoardo Agosti are Co-first authors.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Serioli, S., Agosti, E., Buffoli, B. et al. Microsurgical transcranial approaches to the posterior surface of petrosal portion of the temporal bone: quantitative analysis of surgical volumes and exposed areas. Neurosurg Rev 46, 48 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-01956-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-01956-y