Skip to main content
Log in

Microsurgical transcranial approaches to the posterior surface of petrosal portion of the temporal bone: quantitative analysis of surgical volumes and exposed areas

  • Research
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract 

Different microsurgical transcranial approaches (MTAs) have been described to expose the posterior surface of the petrous bone (PPB). A quantitative, anatomical comparison of the most used MTAs, for specific areas of the PPB, is not available. Anatomical dissections were performed on five formalin-fixed, latex-injected cadaver heads (10 sides). Six MTAs were analyzed: Kawase approach (KWA), retrosigmoid approach (RSA), retrosigmoid approach with suprameatal extension (RSAS), retrolabyrinthine approach (RLA), translabyrinthine approach (TLA), and transcochlear approach (TCA). Surgical volumes and exposed areas of each approach were quantified with a dedicated neuronavigation system (ApproachViewer, part of GTx-Eyes II, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada) and adjuvant software (ITK-SNAP and Autodesk Meshmixer 3.5). Areas and volumes were compared using linear mixed models. TCA provided the best exposure of Trautmann’s triangle and the retromeatal, suprameatal, meatal, and premeatal regions. RSAs provided the best exposure of the inframeatal region, with RSAS gaining significant exposure of the suprameatal region. KWA had the highest surgical volume, and RLA the lowest. Transpetrosal approaches offer the widest exposure of PPB proportionally to their invasiveness. Retrosigmoid approaches, which get to the studied region through a postero-lateral path, are paramount for the exposure of the inframeatal and suprameatal region and, given the adequate exposure of the remaining PPB, represent an effective approach for the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). These anatomical findings must be considered with approach-related morbidity and the pathological features in order to choose the most appropriate approach in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.

References

  1. Açar G, Çiçekcibaşı AE (2020) Surgical anatomy of the temporal bone. In G. Sridharan (ed.), Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, IntechOpen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93223

  2. Agosti E, Saraceno G, Qiu J, Buffoli B, Ferrari M, Raffetti E, Belotti F, Ravanelli M, Mattavelli D, Schreiber A, Hirtler L, Rodella LF, Maroldi R, Nicolai P, Gentili F, Kucharczyk W, Fontanella MM, Doglietto F (2020) Quantitative anatomical comparison of transnasal and transcranial approaches to the clivus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 162(3):649–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04152-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Agosti E, Turri-Zanoni M, Saraceno G, Belotti F, Karligkiotis A, Rocca G, Buffoli B, Raffetti E, Hirtler L, Rezzani R, Rodella LF, Ferrari M, Nicolai P, Bresson D, Herman P, Dallan I, Castelnuovo P, Locatelli D, Fontanella MM, Doglietto F (2021) Quantitative anatomic comparison of microsurgical transcranial, endoscopic endonasal, and transorbital approaches to the spheno-orbital region. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 15;21(6):E494-E505. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opab310

  4. Ambekar S, Amene C, Sonig A, Guthikonda B, Nanda A (2013) Quantitative comparison of retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach and retrosigmoid transtentorial approach: implications for tumors in the petroclival region. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 74(5):300–304. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1348025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bambakidis NC, Gonzalez LF, Amin-Hanjani S, Deshmukh VR, Porter RW, Daspit PC, Spetzler RF (2005) Combined skull base approaches to the posterior fossa. Technical note. Neurosurg Focus 15;19(2):E8. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2005.19.2.9

  6. Bambakidis NC, Kakarla UK, Kim LJ, Nakaji P, Porter RW, Daspit CP, Spetzler RF (2007) Evolution of surgical approaches in the treatment of petroclival meningiomas: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery 61:202–209. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000303218.61230.39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bawornvaraporn U, Zomorodi AR, Friedman AH, Fukushima T (2021) Neurosurgical management of petrous bone lesions: classification system and selection of surgical approaches. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 163(10):2895–2907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04934-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Behari S, Tyagi I, Banerji D, Kumar V, Jaiswal AK, Phadke RV, Jain VK (2010) Postauricular, transpetrosal, presigmoid approach for extensive skull base tumors in the petroclival region: the successes and the travails. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152(10):1633–1645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0701-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Belotti F, Doglietto F, Schreiber A, Ravanelli M, Ferrari M, Lancini D, Rampinelli V, Hirtler L, Buffoli B, Bolzoni Villaret A, Maroldi R, Rodella LF, Nicolai P, Fontanella MM (2018) Modular classification of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approaches to sellar region: anatomic quantitative study. World Neurosurg 109:e281–e291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chae R, Rodriguez Rubio R (2020) Anatomy of petrous face. Handb Clin Neurol 170:143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822198-3.00036-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chanda A, Nanda A (2006) Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach: advantages and disadvantages from an anatomical perspective. Neurosurgery 59(Suppl 1)ONS1–ONS6. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000220673.79877.30

  12. Chang SW, Wu A, Gore P, Beres E, Porter RW, Preul MC, Spetzler RF, Bambakidis NC (2009) Quantitative comparison of Kawase's approach versus the retrosigmoid approach: implications for tumors involving both middle and posterior fossae. Neurosurgery 64(3 Suppl):ons44–51; discussion ons51–2. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000334410.24984

  13. Cui H, Zhou CF, Bao YH, Wang MS, Wang Y (2016) Extended suboccipital retrosigmoid surgical approach is effective for resection of petrous apex meningioma. J Craniofac Surg 27(5):e429–e433. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Daly MJ, Chan H, Nithiananthan S et al (2011) Clinical implementation of intraoperative cone-beam CT in head and neck surgery. In: medical imaging. visualization, image-guided procedures, and modeling. Bellingham WA: Proc SPIE 7964 6:2011

  15. Drazin D, Wang JM, Alonso F, Patel DM, Granger A, Shoja MM, Loukas M, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS (2017) Intracranial anatomical triangles: a comprehensive illustrated review. Cureus 4;9(10):e1741. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1741

  16. De la Cruz A, Teufert KB (2009) Transcochlear approach to cerebellopontine angle and clivus lesions: indications, results, and complications. Otol Neurotol 30(3):373–380. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819a892b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Delwel E (2008) The anterior transpetrosal-transtentorial approach (Kawase approach). Contemp Neurosurg 30:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. DeMonte F, McDermott MW, Al-Mefty O (2011) Al- Mefty’s meningiomas. Thieme Medical Publishers Inc, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Doglietto F, Qiu J, Ravichandiran M et al (2017) Quantitative comparison of cranial approaches in the anatomy laboratory: a neuronavigation-based research method. World J Methodol 7:139–147. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v7.i4.139

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Doglietto F, Ferrari M, Mattavelli D, Belotti F, Rampinelli V, Kheshaifati H, Lancini D, Schreiber A, Sorrentino T, Ravanelli M, Buffoli B, Hirtler L, Maroldi R, Nicolai P, Rodella LF, Fontanella MM (2018) Transnasal endoscopic and lateral approaches to the clivus: a quantitative anatomic study. World Neurosurg 113:e659–e671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Doglietto F, Belotti F, Qiu J, Roca E, Radovanovic I, Agur A, Kucharczyk W, Schreiber A, Villaret AB, Nicolai P, Gentili F, Fontanella MM (2019) Endonasal and transoral approaches to the craniovertebral junction: a quantitative anatomical study. Acta Neurochir Suppl 125:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62515-7_6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ebner FH, Koerbel A, Kirschniak A, Roser F, Kaminsky J, Tatagiba M (2007) Endoscope-assisted retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to the middle fossa: anatomical and surgical considerations. Eur J Surg Oncol 33(1):109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2006.09.036

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Elhammady MS, Telischi FF, Morcos JJ (2012) Retrosigmoid approach: indications, techniques, and results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 45(2):375–97, ix. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2012.02.001

  24. Ferrari M, Schreiber A, Mattavelli D, Lombardi D, Rampinelli V, Doglietto F, Rodella LF, Nicolai P (2019) Surgical anatomy of the parapharyngeal space: multiperspective, quantification-based study. Head Neck 41(3):642–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.25378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Giammattei L, Passeri T, Abbritti R, Lieber S, Matano F, Le Van T, Okano A, Fava A, Russo PD, Froelich S (2022) Surgical morbidity of the extradural anterior petrosal approach: the Lariboisière experience. J Neurosurg 13:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.3.JNS212962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hafez A, Nader R, Al-Mefty O (2011) Preservation of the superior petrosal sinus during the petrosal approach. J Neurosurg 114(5):1294–1298. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.6.JNS091461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hassaan SA, Tamura R, Morimoto Y, Kosugi K, Mahmoud M, Abokerasha A, Moussa A, Toda M, Yoshida K (2020) Surgical outcomes of anterior cerebellopontine angle meningiomas using the anterior transpetrosal approach compared with the lateral suboccipital approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 162(6):1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04236-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hirsch BE, Cass SP, Sekhar LN, Wright DC (1993) Translabyrinthine approach to skull base tumors with hearing preservation. Am J Otol 14(6):533–543

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hitselberger WE, Pulec JL (1972) Trigeminal nerve (posterior root) retrolabyrintine selective section-operative procedure for intractable pain. Arch Otolaryngol 96(5):412–415. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1972.00770090644004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Horgan MA, Anderson GJ, Kellogg JX, Schwartz MS, Spektor S, McMenomey SO, Delashaw JB (2000) Classification and quantification of the petrosal approach to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg 93(1):108–112. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.93.1.0108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. House WF, De la Cruz A, Hitselberger WE (1978) Surgery of the skull base: transcochlear approach to the petrous apex and clivus. Otolaryngology 86:770–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459987808600522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hsu FP, Anderson GJ, Dogan A, Finizio J, Noguchi A, Liu KC, McMenomey SO, Delashaw JB Jr (2004) Extended middle fossa approach: quantitative analysis of petroclival exposure and surgical freedom as a function of successive temporal bone removal by using frameless stereotaxy. J Neurosurg 100(4):695–699. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.100.4.0695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacquesson T, Berhouma M, Tringali S, Simon E, Jouanneau E (2015) Which routes for petroclival tumors? A comparison between the anterior expanded endoscopic endonasal approach and lateral or posterior routes. World Neurosurg 83(6):929–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.02.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jägersberg M, Brodard J, Qiu J, Mansouri A, Doglietto F, Gentili F, Kucharczyk W, Fasel J, Schaller K, Radovanovic I (2017) Quantification of working volumes, exposure, and target-specific maneuverability of the pterional craniotomy and its minimally invasive variants. World Neurosurg 101:710-717.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jun W, Gao YL, Yu HG, Huang QL, Long XQ, Liu GH, Ting X, Zhong XY, Zhou YF (2020) Comparison of translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach for treating vestibular schwannoma: a meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 196:105994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kawase T, Toya S, Shiobara R, Mine T (1985) Transpetrosal approach for aneurysms of the lower basilar artery. J Neurosurg 63:857–886. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1985.63.6.0857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Muhanna N, Chan H, Qiu J, Daly M, Khan T, Doglietto F, Kucharczyk W, Goldstein DP, Irish JC, de Almeida JR (2018) Volumetric analysis of endoscopic and maxillary swing surgical approaches for nasopharyngectomy. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 79(5):466–474. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1617432

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Nguyen-Huynh AT, Jackler RK, Pfister M, Tseng J (2007) The aborted early history of the translabyrinthine approach: a victim of suppression or technical prematurity? Otol Neurotol 28:269e279. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31802b3264

  39. Pyykkö I, Zou J, Gürkov R, Naganawa S, Nakashima T (2019) Imaging of temporal bone. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 82:12–31. https://doi.org/10.1159/000490268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rhoton AL (2007) Overview of temporal bone. Neurosurgery 61(suppl_4):S4–7–S4–60. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000280024.07630.65

  41. Rhoton AL Jr (2000) The cerebellopontine angle and posterior fossa cranial nerves by the retrosigmoid approach. Neurosurgery 47:S93-129. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200009001-00013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Samii M, Carvalho GA, Tatagiba M, Matthies C, Vorkapic P (1996) Meningiomas of the tentorial notch: surgical anatomy and management. J Neurosurg 84(3):375–381. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.84.3.0375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Samii M, Draf W (1989) Surgery of the skull base. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 386±399

  44. Samii M, Tatagiba M, Carvalho GA (2000) Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to Meckel’s cave and the middle fossa: surgical technique and outcome. J Neurosurg 92(2):235–241. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.92.2.0235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sanna M, Agarwal M, Jain Y, Russo A, Taibah AK (2003) Transapical extension in difficult cerebellopontine angle tumours: preliminary report. J Laryngol Otol 117(10):788–792. https://doi.org/10.1258/002221503770716214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Saraceno G, Agosti E, Qiu J, Buffoli B, Ferrari M, Raffetti E, Belotti F, Ravanelli M, Mattavelli D, Schreiber A, Hirtler L, Rodella LF, Maroldi R, Nicolai P, Gentili F, Kucharczyk W, Fontanella MM, Doglietto F (2020) Quantitative anatomical comparison of anterior, anterolateral and lateral, microsurgical and endoscopic approaches to the middle cranial fossa. World Neurosurg 134:e682–e730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sato Y, Mizutani T, Shimizu K, Freund HJ, Samii M (2018) Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal-inframeatal approach for complete surgical removal of a giant recurrent vestibular schwannoma with severe petrous bone involvement: technical case report. World Neurosurg 110:93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Schaller B, Merlo A, Gratzl O, Probst R (1999) Premeatal and retromeatal cerebellopontine angle meningioma. Two distinct clinical entities. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141(5):465–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010050326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Schreiber A, Ferrari M, Rampinelli V, Doglietto F, Belotti F, Lancini D, Ravanelli M, Rodella LF, Fontanella MM, Nicolai P (2017) Modular Endoscopic medial maxillectomies: quantitative analysis of surgical exposure in a preclinical setting. World Neurosurg 100:44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schreiber A, Mattavelli D, Ferrari M, Rampinelli V, Lancini D, Ravanelli M, Bertazzoni G, Rodella LF, Buffoli B, Doglietto F, Nicolai P (2017) Anterior superior alveolar nerve injury after extended endoscopic medial maxillectomy: a preclinical study to predict neurological morbidity. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 7(10):1014–1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Seoane E, Rhoton AL Jr (1999) Suprameatal extension of the retrosigmoid approach: microsurgical anatomy. Neurosurgery 44:553–560. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199903000-00065

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Shibao S, Borghei-Razavi H, Orii M, Yoshida K (2015) Anterior transpetrosal approach combined with partial posterior petrosectomy for petroclival meningiomas with posterior extension. World Neurosurg 84(2):574–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.03.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Siwanuwatn R, Deshmukh P, Figueiredo EG, Crawford NR, Spetzler RF, Preul MC (2006) Quantitative analysis of the working area and angle of attack for the retrosigmoid, combined petrosal, and transcochlear approaches to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg 104:137–142. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2006.104.1.137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Takuro I, Yukihiro G, Mustaqim P, Takanori F (2020) Resection of the suprameatal tubercle in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 162(5):1089–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04242-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Tang CT, Kurozumi K, Pillai P, Filipce V, Chiocca EA, Ammirati M (2013) Quantitative analysis of surgical exposure and maneuverability associated with the endoscope and the microscope in the retrosigmoid and various posterior petrosectomy approaches to the petroclival region using computer tomograpy-based frameless stereotaxy. A cadaveric study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115(7):1058–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.10.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tang K, Zhou J, Zhou Q, Zhao Y, Liu C (2016) Comparison of subtemporal versus presigmoidal approaches for exposing petrous apex utilizing virtual reality technique. Chin J Contemp Neurol Neurosurg 16:424–428. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2016.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tubbs RS, Griessenauer C, Loukas M, Ansari SF, Fritsch MH, Cohen-Gadol AA (2014) Trautmann’s triangle anatomy with application to posterior transpetrosal and other related skull base procedures. Clin Anat 27(7):994–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Volovici V, Dammers R, Dirven CMF, Delwel EJ (2020) Conquering the rock-a retrospective single-center experience of the transapical petrosal transtentorial (Kawase) approach: operative technique and impact on cranial nerve function. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 81(5):526–535. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1692485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Wong AK, Stamates MM, Bhansali AP, Shinners M, Wong RH (2017) Radiographic assessment of the presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approach. Surg Neurol Int 27(8):129. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_243_16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wu CY, Lan Q (2008) Quantification of the presigmoid transpetrosal keyhole approach to petroclival region. Chin Med J (Engl) 20;121(8):740–4

  61. Yang H, Li M, Chen G, Liang J, Bao Y, Li M, Ling F (2021) Using the arcuate eminence-trigeminal notch line to localize the anterior wall of the internal auditory canal in a subtemporal approach: an anatomical study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 82(Suppl 3):e196–e202. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Zanoletti E, Martini A, Emanuelli E, Mazzoni A (2012) Lateral approaches to the skull base. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 32(5):281–287

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Zanoletti E, Mazzoni A, Martini A, Abbritti RV, Albertini R, Alexandre E, Baro V, Bartolini S, Bernardeschi D, Bivona R, Bonali M, Borghesi I, Borsetto D, Bovo R, Breun M, Calbucci F, Carlson ML, Caruso A, Cayé-Thomasen P, Cazzador D, Champagne PO, Colangeli R, Conte G, D'Avella D, Danesi G, Deantonio L, Denaro L, Di Berardino F, Draghi R, Ebner FH, Favaretto N, Ferri G, Fioravanti A, Froelich S, Giannuzzi A, Girasoli L, Grossardt BR, Guidi M, Hagen R, Hanakita S, Hardy DG, Iglesias VC, Jefferies S, Jia H, Kalamarides M, Kanaan IN, Krengli M, Landi A, Lauda L, Lepera D, Lieber S, Lloyd SLK, Lovato A, Maccarrone F, Macfarlane R, Magnan J, Magnoni L, Marchioni D, Marinelli JP, Marioni G, Mastronardi V, Matthies C, Moffat DA, Munari S, Nardone M, Pareschi R, Pavone C, Piccirillo E, Piras G, Presutti L, Restivo G, Reznitsky M, Roca E, Russo A, Sanna M, Sartori L, Scheich M, Shehata-Dieler W, Soloperto D, Sorrentino F, Sterkers O, Taibah A, Tatagiba M, Tealdo G, Vlad D, Wu H, Zanetti D (2019) Surgery of the lateral skull base: a 50-year endeavour. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 39(SUPPL. 1):S1-S146. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-39-2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Edoardo Agosti, Simona Serioli, and Elena Raffetti. The manuscript was written by Edoardo Agosti, Simona Serioli, Riccardo Draghi, Francesco Doglietto, and reviewed by all authors. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edoardo Agosti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The anatomical study was performed in line principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Simona Serioli, Edoardo Agosti are Co-first authors.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 4573 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Serioli, S., Agosti, E., Buffoli, B. et al. Microsurgical transcranial approaches to the posterior surface of petrosal portion of the temporal bone: quantitative analysis of surgical volumes and exposed areas. Neurosurg Rev 46, 48 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-01956-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-01956-y

Keywords

Navigation