Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of DPSIR framework to evaluate sustainability in coastal areas. Case study: Guanabara Bay basin, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Guanabara Bay basin, SE Brazil, is shown as an experimental site to evaluate development and sustainability in coastal areas. We developed a Driver–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) framework in a practical context to integrate natural and socio-economic indicators. Sustainability reflects public policies towards the utilization of natural resources. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) included in DPSIR evaluates losses and benefits resulting from such policies. CBA has some limitations due to the difficulty of valuating environmental goods and services. Instead of valuating them we propose to combine sustainability indicators and defensive expenditures for the implementation of public policies. This approach agrees with the environmental conservation paradigm implicit in sustainable development. It allows an estimation of the physical natural capital depreciation (PNCD), by using it to correct the gross domestic product (GDP) of the study area, and demonstrating the present non-sustainable characteristics of the current policies applied to the area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Barbier EB (1993) Sustainable use of wetlands valuing tropical wetland benefits: economic methodologies and applications. Geogr J 159:22–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidone ED (2000) Análise econômico-ambiental aplicada à contaminação das águas fluviais de pequenas bacias costeiras do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. In: Esteves FA, Lacerda LD (eds) Ecologia de Restingas e Lagoas Costeiras. EDUFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, pp 371–394

  • Bidone ED, Silva Filho EV, Guerra T, Barroso LV, Ovalle ARC(1999) Natural and cultural nutrient levels in rivers of coastal lagoon catchments, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In: Knoppers BA, Bidone ED, Abrão JJ (eds) Environmental geochemistry of coastal lagoon systems of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Departamento de Geoquimica, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, pp 89–106

  • Bidone ED, Maddock JEL, Castilhos ZC (2002) A practical method to internalize environmental impacts into cost benefit analysis. Environ Practice 4:31–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Billen G (1993) The Phison River system: a conceptual model of C, N and P transformations in the aquatic continuum from land to sea in interactions of C, N, P and S biogeochemical cycles and global change. In: Wollast R, Mackenzie FT, Chou L (eds) NATO ASI series I: global environmental change. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 141–161

  • Campos ED, Bidone ED (2000) Potential ecological risk index for heavy metals: assay at Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In: Proc 25th Int Conf Heavy Metals in the Environment, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, available in CD-ROM

  • Carvalho CEV, Lacerda LD (1992) Heavy metals in the biota of Guanabara Bay: why such low concentrations. Ciênc Cult 44:184–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Castilhos ZC, Bidone ZC, Hartz S (2003)Bioaccumulation of Hg by Tucunaré (Cichla ocellaris) from Tapajós River region, Brazilian Amazon. A field dose-response approach. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 66:631–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R (1991) Ecological economics, the science and management of sustainability. Columbia University Press, South Carolina

  • El Serafy S (1991) The environment as capital. In: Costanza R (ed) Ecological economics, the science and management of sustainability. Columbia University Press, South Carolina, pp 168–175

  • Håkanson L (1988) Metal monitoring in coastal environments. In: Seeliger U, Lacerda LD, Patchineelam SR (eds) Metals in coastal environments of Latin America. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 240–257

  • Håkanson L (1980) An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control: a sedimentological approach. Water Res 14:975–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal G (2000) Valuing ecosystem services. Ecosystems 3:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hueting R (1991) Correcting national income for environmental losses: a practical solution for a theoretical dilemma. In: Costanza R (ed) Ecological economics. Columbia University Press, South Carolina, pp 194–213

  • Japan International Cooperation Agency (1994) The study on recuperation of the Guanabara Bay ecosystem. Main report. JICA, Yokohama

  • Kjerfve B, Dias GT (1997) Physical oceanography of Guanabara Bay. Cont Shelf Res 17:1609–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp RJ, Krupnick AJ, Toman M (1997) Cost-benefit analysis and regulatory reform: an assessment of the science and the art. In: Proc Conf Resources for the Future, January, Washington, Discussion Pap 97–19

  • Kremer HH, Salomons W, Crossland CJ (2002) Human dimensions of land-based fluxes to the coastal zone: the LOICZ-Basins approach. In: Lacerda LD, Kremer HH, Kjerve B, Salomons W, Marshall Crossland JI, Crossland CJ (2002) South American Basins: LOICZ global change assessment and synthesis of river catchments–coastal sea interaction and human dimensions. LOICZ reports and studies no 21. LOICZ, Texel, The Netherlands, pp 61–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacerda LD, Kremer HH, Kjerve B, Salomons W, Marshall Crossland JI, Crossland CJ (2002) South American Basins: LOICZ global change assessment and synthesis of river catchments–coastal sea interaction and human dimensions. LOICZ reports and studies no 21. LOICZ, Texel, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Molisani M, Marins RV, Machado W, Paraquetti HHM, Lacerda LD (2003) Environmental changes in Sepetiba Bay, SE Brazil. Reg Environ Change (in press)

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1994) Environmental indicators: OECD core set. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce DW, Turner RK (1990) Economics of natural resources and the environment. Harvester Wheatsheaf, London

  • Peskin HM (1989) A proposed environmental accounts framework. In: Proc Environmental Accounting for Sustainable Development, UNEP–World Bank Symp, Washington, pp 65–78

  • Turner RK, Adger WN, Lorenzoni I (1998) Towards integrated modeling and analysis in coastal zones: principles and practices. LOICZ reports and studies no 11. LOICZ, Texel, The Netherlands, pp 1–122

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1992) World development report: development and environment. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future—The Brundtland Report. WCED, Gland

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. D. Lacerda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bidone, E.D., Lacerda, L.D. The use of DPSIR framework to evaluate sustainability in coastal areas. Case study: Guanabara Bay basin, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Reg Environ Change 4, 5–16 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-003-0059-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-003-0059-2

Keywords