Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of low-level laser therapy on pathophysiology and locomotor recovery after traumatic spinal cord injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the effective therapeutic parameters and evaluate the regenerative potential of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) after traumatic spinal cord injuries (TSCIs) in animal studies. The EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched on October 5, 2019, and followed with an update on January 2, 2021. All animal studies discussing the effect of LLLT on main pathophysiological events after TSCI, including inflammation, axon growth, remyelination, glial scar formation, cavity size, and locomotor recovery, were included. For statistical analysis, we used mean difference with 95% confidence intervals for locomotor recovery. In total, 19 articles were included based on our criteria. The results showed that regardless of laser type, laser beams with a wavelength between 600 and 850 nm significantly suppress inflammation and led inflammatory cells to M2 polarization and wound healing. Also, laser therapy using these wavelengths for more than 2 weeks significantly improved axon regeneration and remyelination. Improvement of locomotor recovery was more efficient using wavelengths less than 700 nm (SMD = 1.21; 95%CI: 0.09, 2.33; p = 0.03), lasers with energy densities less than 100 J/cm2 (SMD = 1.72; 95%CI: 0.84, 2.59; p = 0.0001) and treatment duration between 1 and 2 weeks (SMD = 2.21; 95%CI: 1.24, 3.19; p < 0.00001). The LLLT showed promising potential to modulate pathophysiological events and recovery after TSCI, although there was heterogeneity in study design and reporting methods, which should be considered in future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Arg1:

Arginase 1

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

BBB:

Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan locomotor scale method

BDNF:

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor

COX:

Cytochrome oxidase

CST:

Corticospinal tract

GaAlAs:

Gallium aluminum-arsenide

GM1:

Monosialotetrahexosylganglioside

IL-6:

Interleukin 6

iNOS:

Inducible nitric oxide synthase

LLLT:

Low-level laser therapy

MCP-1:

Monocyte chemoattractant protein

MIP-1α:

Macrophage inflammatory protein

MPS:

Methylprednisolone

NF200:

200-kDa Neurofilament protein

NG2:

Neuron-glial antigen 2

OEC:

Olfactory ensheathing cells

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

RT-PCR:

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

SD:

Sprague-Dawley

STAT3:

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha

References

  1. Rahimi-Movaghar V, Sayyah MK, Akbari H, Khorramirouz R, Rasouli MR, Moradi-Lakeh M et al (2013) Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in developing countries: a systematic review. Neuroepidemiology. 41(2):65–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahuja CS, Wilson JR, Nori S, Kotter MRN, Druschel C, Curt A et al (2017) Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Dis Prim 3:17018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Siddiqui AM, Khazaei M, Fehlings MG (2015) Translating mechanisms of neuroprotection, regeneration, and repair to treatment of spinal cord injury. Prog Brain Res 218: Elsevier:15–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rowland JW, Hawryluk GW, Kwon B, Fehlings MG (2008) Current status of acute spinal cord injury pathophysiology and emerging therapies: promise on the horizon. Neurosurg Focus 25(5):E2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hassannejad Z, Sharif-Alhoseini M, Shakouri-Motlagh A, Vahedi F, Zadegan SA, Mokhatab M et al (2015) Potential variables affecting the quality of animal studies regarding pathophysiology of traumatic spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord 54:579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hassannejad Z, Shakouri-Motlagh A, Mokhatab M, Zadegan SA, Sharif-Alhoseini M, Shokraneh F et al (2019) Oligodendrogliogenesis and axon remyelination after traumatic spinal cord injuries in animal studies: a systematic review. Neuroscience. 402:37–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Bmj. 315(7109):629–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Svobodova B, Kloudova A, Ruzicka J, Kajtmanova L, Navratil L, Sedlacek R et al (2019) The effect of 808 nm and 905 nm wavelength light on recovery after spinal cord injury. Sci Rep 9(1):1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gong Y, Wang S, Liang Z, Wang Z, Zhang X, Li J et al (2018) Label-free spectral imaging unveils biochemical mechanisms of low-level laser therapy on spinal cord injury. Cell Physiol Biochem 49(3):1168–1183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mojarad N, Janzadeh A, Yousefifard M, Nasirinezhad F (2018) The role of low level laser therapy on neuropathic pain relief and interleukin-6 expression following spinal cord injury: an experimental study. J Chem Neuroanat 87:60–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. On-ong-arj P, Wattanathorn J, Muchimapura S, Thukham-mee W. Yellow laser stimulation at GV2 acupoint mitigates apoptosis, oxidative stress, inflammation, and motor deficit in spinal cord injury rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018;2018.

  13. Pedram MS, Dehghan MM, Shojaee M, Fekrazad R, Sharifi D, Farzan A et al (2018) Therapeutic effects of simultaneous photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) and meloxicam administration on experimental acute spinal cord injury: rat animal model. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 189:49–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Janzadeh A, Sarveazad A, Yousefifard M, Dameni S, Samani FS, Mokhtarian K et al (2017) Combine effect of chondroitinase ABC and low level laser (660 nm) on spinal cord injury model in adult male rats. Neuropeptides. 65:90–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim J, Kim E-H, Lee K, Kim B, Kim Y, Na SH et al (2017) Low-level laser irradiation improves motor recovery after contusive spinal cord injury in rats. Tissue Eng Regen Med 14(1):57–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Song JW, Li K, Liang ZW, Dai C, Shen XF, Gong YZ et al (2017) Low-level laser facilitates alternatively activated macrophage/microglia polarization and promotes functional recovery after crush spinal cord injury in rats. Sci Rep 7(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Veronez S, Assis L, Del Campo P, de Oliveira F, de Castro G, Renno ACM et al (2017) Effects of different fluences of low-level laser therapy in an experimental model of spinal cord injury in rats. Lasers Med Sci 32(2):343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giacci MK, Wheeler L, Lovett S, Dishington E, Majda B, Bartlett CA et al (2014) Differential effects of 670 and 830 nm red near infrared irradiation therapy: a comparative study of optic nerve injury, retinal degeneration, traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. PLoS One:9–8

  19. Paula AA, Nicolau RA, de Oliveira Lima M, Salgado MAC, Cogo JC (2014) Low-intensity laser therapy effect on the recovery of traumatic spinal cord injury. Lasers Med Sci 29(6):1849–1859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ando T, Sato S, Kobayashi H, Nawashiro H, Ashida H, Hamblin MR (2013) Low-level laser therapy for spinal cord injury in rats: effects of polarization. J Biomed Opt 18(9):098002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. de Souza FI, Cristante AF, Marcon RM, Ferreira R, dos Santos GB, de Barros Filho TEP (2013) Transdermal monosialoganglioside with laser in the treatment of spinal cord lesion in rats. Acta Ortopedica Brasileira 21(2):87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu X, Moges H, DeTaboada L, Anders J (2012) Comparison of the effects of pulsed and continuous wave light on axonal regeneration in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Lasers Med Sci 27(2):525–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu X, Dmitriev AE, Cardoso MJ, Viers-Costello AG, Borke RC, Streeter J et al (2009) 810 nm Wavelength light: an effective therapy for transected or contused rat spinal cord. Lasers Surg Med 41(1):36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Byrnes KR, Waynant RW, Ilev IK, Wu X, Barna L, Smith K et al (2005) Light promotes regeneration and functional recovery and alters the immune response after spinal cord injury. Lasers Surg Med 36(3):171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rochkind S, Shahar A, Alon M, Nevo Z (2002) Transplantation of embryonal spinal cord nerve cells cultured on biodegradable microcarriers followed by low power laser irradiation for the treatment of traumatic paraplegia in rats. Neurol Res 24(4):355–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun J, Zhang J, Li K, Zheng Q, Song J, Liang Z et al (2019) Photobiomodulation therapy inhibit the activation and secretory of astrocytes by altering macrophage polarization. Cell Mol Neurobiol 40(1):141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen H, Wang Y, Tu W, Wang H, Yin H, Sha H et al (2020) Effects of photobiomodulation combined with MSCs transplantation on the repair of spinal cord injury in rat. J Cell Physiol 236(2):921–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bjordal JM, Johnson MI, Iversen V, Aimbire F, Lopes-Martins RAB (2006) Low-level laser therapy in acute pain: a systematic review of possible mechanisms of action and clinical effects in randomized placebo-controlled trials. Photomed Laser Ther 24(2):158–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. de Andrade ALM, Bossini PS, Parizotto NA (2016) Use of low level laser therapy to control neuropathic pain: a systematic review. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 164:36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramezani F, Razmgir M, Tanha K, Nasirinezhad F, Neshasteriz A, Bahrami-Ahmadi A, et al. Photobiomodulation for spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiology & Behavior. 2020:112977.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Mahmoud Yousefifard for his contribution on publication bias assessment.

Funding

This work was funded by the Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (No. 97-03-38-40875).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zahra Hassannejad or Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Search strategies used in MEDLINE and Embase

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayar, Z., Gholami, B., Piri, S.M. et al. The effect of low-level laser therapy on pathophysiology and locomotor recovery after traumatic spinal cord injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 37, 61–75 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03301-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03301-5

Keywords

Navigation