Abstract
Environmental impact assessment has gained equal importance with economics in process industries. Various methodologies are extensively used for impact assessment namely life cycle assessment (LCA), emergy analysis and ecological footprint analysis. The LEEF methodology calculates ecological footprint using emergy analysis and LCA to quantify impact in terms of local hectares of land. This work tries to merge the strength of all the three methodologies. Ecological footprint due for input provisioning is calculated using regional emergy density (RED), and ecological footprint due to emissions/waste assimilation is calculated using the LCA results. The LEEF framework is named as LCA-emergy-ecological footprint (LEEF) framework. LEEF is demonstrated using the case study of formaldehyde manufacturing process. The major advantages of using LEEF are (1) it accounts for emissions aggregated based on its impact on environment using LCA like acidifying emissions, other than just carbon dioxide which may cause serious harm to environment, (2) it incorporates all flows including renewable energy flows from ecosystem, (3) assigns quality to each input flow and evaluates sustainability from donor-side perspective and (4) calculates ecological footprint in local hectares thereby accounting for the impact on regional ecosystem rather than global ecosystem, making assessment more realistic.
Graphic abstract
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Bakshi BR (2002) A thermodynamic framework for ecologically conscious process systems engineering. Comput Chem Eng 26(2):269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(01)00745-1
Bakshi BR, Ziv G, Lepech DM (2015) Techno-ecological synergy: a framework for sustainable engineering. Environ Sci Technol 49(3):1752–1760. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5041442
Baral A, Bakshi BR (2009) Thermodynamic metrics for aggregation of natural resources in life cycle analysis: insight via application to some transportation fuels. Environ Sci Technol 44(2):800–807. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902571b
Bassi N, Kumar MD, Sharma A, Pardha-Saradhi P (2014) Status of wetlands in India: a review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. J Hydrol Region Stud 2:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.07.001
Bhattacharya A, Mudgal R, Taneja A (2004) Acid deposition and critical load analysis in Agra, India. J Hazard Mater 106(2–3):157–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2003.11.003
Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G, Gracey K, Iha K, Larson J, Lazarus E, Morales JC, Wackernagel M, Galli A (2013) Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: the National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol Ind 24:518–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.005
Brown MT, Ulgiati S (1997) Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation. Ecol Eng 9:51–69
Brown MT, Ulgiati S (2002) Emergy evaluations and environmental loading of electricity production systems. J Clean Prod 10(4):321–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00043-9
Brown MarkT, Ulgiati S (2016) Emergy assessment of global renewable sources. Ecol Model 339:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.03.010
Butnariu A, Avasilcai S (2014) Research on the possibility to apply ecological footprint as environmental performance indicator for the textile industry. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 124:344–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.495
Cao K, Feng X (2008) The emergy analysis of loop circuit. Environ Monit Assess 147(1–3), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-0116-2
Cherniwchan J (2010) Economic growth, industrialization, and the environment Jevan Cherniwchan, vol 403, pp 1–39
Corcelli F, Ripa M, Ulgiati S (2017) Efficiency and sustainability indicators for papermaking from virgin pulp—An emergy-based case study. Resour Conserv Recycl 131:313–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.11.028
Data N (2010) Nagpur district data. https://nagpur.gov.in/
Galli A, Kitzes J, Niccolucci V, Wackernagel M, Wada Y, Marchettini N (2012) Assessing the global environmental consequences of economic growth through the ecological footprint: a focus on China and India. Ecol Ind 17:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.022
Guinée JB (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards, vol 6, Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00101-4
Hau JL, Bakshi BR (2004) Promise and problems of emergy analysis. Ecol Model. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.12.016
Henry J, Aherne J, Starkloff T, Stolte J, Bejan A, Wikipedia F, Problems E, Causes T, Ericks A, Adolphe K, David B, Florent B, Dominique N, Un T, Change C, News N, Silva JA, Evensen CI, Bowen RL et al (2014) Testing your soil why and how to take a soil-test sample. Agron Soils 4(2006):1–12. https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V4-N2-143-153
Huijbregts MAJ, Hellweg S, Frischknecht R, Hungerbühler K, Hendriks AJ (2008) Ecological footprint accounting in the life cycle assessment of products. Ecol Econ 64(4):798–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.017
International Organization for Standardization (2006) ISO 14044: environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines
Kaul M, Mohren GMJ, Dadhwal VK (2010) Carbon storage and sequestration potential of selected tree species in India. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 15(5):489–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9230-5
Li L, Lu H, Campbell DE, Ren H (2010) Emergy algebra: improving matrix methods for calculating transformities. Ecol Model 221(3):411–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.10.015
Mikulčić H, Cabezas H, Vujanović M, Duić N (2016) Environmental assessment of different cement manufacturing processes based on emergy and ecological footprint analysis. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.087
Monfreda C, Wackernagel M, Deumling D (2004) Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments. Land Use Policy 21(3):231–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.009
Musikavong C, Gheewala SH (2017) Assessing ecological footprints of products from the rubber industry and palm oil mills in Thailand. J Clean Prod 142:1148–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.117
Nayak RK, Patel NR, Dadhwal VK (2013) Inter-annual variability and climate control of terrestrial net primary productivity over India. Int J Climatol 33(1):132–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3414
Odum HT (1996) Environmental accounting emergy and environmental decision making. Wiley, New York
Odum HT (2000) Folio #2 handbook of emergy evaluation: a compendium of data for emergy computation issued in a series of folios. http://www.emergysystems.org/folios.php
Odum HT (2002) Handbook of emergy evaluation. A compendium of data for emergy computation. Agriculture 4:1–40
Pulselli RM, Simoncini E, Pulselli FM, Bastianoni S (2007) Emergy analysis of building manufacturing, maintenance and use: em-building indices to evaluate housing sustainability. Energy Build 39(5):620–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.10.004
Qian M, Liauw MA, Emig G (2003) Formaldehyde synthesis from methanol over silver catalysts. Appl Catal A 238(2):211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00340-X
Raugei M, Rugani B, Benetto E, Ingwersen WW (2014) Integrating emergy into LCA: potential added value and lingering obstacles. Ecol Model 271:4–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.11.025
Rees W (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban 4(2):121–130
Sha S, Hurme M (2012) Emergy evaluation of combined heat and power plant processes. Appl Therm Eng 43:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.11.063
Siche R, Agostinho F, Ortega E (2010) Emergy net primary production (ENPP) as basis for calculation of ecological footprint. Ecol Ind 10(2):475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.018
Wackernagel M, Rees W (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on earth. New Society Publishers. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=WVNEAQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Our+ecological+footprint+&ots=VlXQ3NqKRo&sig=3ZP5nnWpn8Q8cNVC8TPuXPBy1s0
Zhang L, Dzakpasu M, Chen R, Wang XC (2017) Validity and utility of ecological footprint accounting: a state-of-the-art review. Sustain Cities Soc 32:411–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.04.016
Zhao S, Li Z, Li W (2005) A modified method of ecological footprint calculation and its application. Ecol Model 185(1):65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.11.016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zadgaonkar, L.A., Mandavgane, S.A. Framework for calculating ecological footprint of process industries in local hectares using emergy and LCA approach. Clean Techn Environ Policy 22, 2207–2221 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01970-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01970-4