Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical significance of bacteriuria with low colony counts of Enterococcus species

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The clinical significance of low counts of enterococci in urine cultures remains unclear. The goal of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of enterococci growing in numbers lower than 100,000 colony-forming units per milliliter (cfu/ml) in urine samples. Clinical parameters were collected from patients whose midstream clean-catch urine samples grew Enterococcus spp. in amounts between ≥10,000 and 100,000 cfu/ml and who were not previously treated with antibiotics. Only those patients who had leukocyturia in addition to positive culture were considered to have true urinary tract infection (UTI). Of the 208 patients included in the study, 54% were diagnosed with true UTI. Patients with true UTI were older by 6 years (p=0.03), were more likely to be hospitalized (p=0.016), had higher rates of dysuria (p=0.0001), urgency (p=0.0001), and frequency (p=0.0001), and had more solid tumors (p=0.03). By multivariate analysis, urgency (OR=7.1) and hospitalization (OR=4.4) were identified as independent risk factors for true UTI with enterococci in low counts. Enterococcal counts in patients with true UTI were randomly distributed all along the scale between 10,000 and 100,000 cfu/ml, and no differential cutoff could be determined. In conclusion, more than half of the patients whose urine cultures grow Enterococcus spp. in counts lower than 100,000 cfu/ml may have true UTI, especially if they are hospitalized and have symptoms of dysuria, urgency, or frequency. Microbiology laboratories should perform a complete work-up on samples containing low counts of enterococci, and the final interpretation should be done by physicians, using additional clinical information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patton JP, Nash DB, Abrytyn E (1991) Urinary tract infection: economic considerations. Med Clin North Am 75:495–513

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kass EH, Finland M (1956) Asymptomatic infections of the urinary tract. Trans Assoc Am Physicians 69:56–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stamm WE, Hooton M (1993) Management of urinary tract infections in adults. N Engl J Med 329:1328–1334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lipsky A (1999) Prostatitis and urinary tract infections in men: what’s new, what’s true? Am J Med 106:327–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moellering RC Jr (1992) Emergence of Enterococcus as a significant pathogen. Clin Infect Dis 14:1173–1176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Felmingham D, Wilson AP, Quintana AI, Gruneberg RN (1992) Enterococcus species in urinary tract infection. Clin Infect Dis 15:295–301

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruoff KL, de la Maza L, Murtagh MJ, Spargo JD, Ferraro MJ (1990) Species identities of enterococci isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 28:435–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones RN, Kugler KC, Pfaller MA, Winokur PL (1999) Characteristics of pathogens causing urinary tract infections in hospitals in North America: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 35:55–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Griebling TL (2005) Urologic Diseases in America Project: trends in resource use for urinary tract infections in women. J Urol 173:1281–1287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mathai D, Jones RN, Pfaller MA, and the SENTRY Participant Group North America (2001) Epidemiology and frequency of resistance among pathogens causing urinary tract infections in 1,510 hospitalized patients: a report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (North America). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 40:129–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Laupland KB, Bagshaw SM, Gregson DB, Kirkpatrick AW, Ross T, Church DL (2005) Intensive care unit-acquired urinary tract infections in a regional critical care system. Crit Care 9:R60–R65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laupland KB, Zygun DA, Davis HD, Church DL, Louie TJ, Doig CJ (2002) Incidence and risk factors for acquiring nosocomial urinary tract infection in the critically ill. J Crit Care 17:50–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Langley JM, Hanakowski M, Leblanc JC (2001) Unique epidemiology of nosocomial urinary tract infection in children. Am J Infect Control 29:94–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Moulin F, Quintart A, Sauvestre C, Mensah K, Bergeret M, Raymond J (1998) Nosocomial urinary tract infections: retrospective study in a pediatric hospital. Arch Pediatr 5(Suppl 3):274S–278S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morrison AJ Jr, Wenzel RP (1986) Nosocomial urinary tract infections due to enterococcus. Ten years experience at a university hospital. Arch Intern Med 146:1549–1551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bitsori M, Maraki S, Raissaki M, Bakantaki A, Galanakis E (2005) Community-acquired enterococcal urinary tract infections. Pediatr Nephrol 20:1583–1586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ronald A (2002) The etiology of urinary tract infection: traditional and emerging pathogens. Am J Med 113(Suppl 1A):14S–19S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tailor SA, Bailey EM, Rybak MJ (1993) Enterococcus, an emerging pathogen. Ann Pharmacother 27:1231–1242

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wong AH, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB (2000) Epidemiology of bacteriuria caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci—a retrospective study. Am J Infect Control 28:277–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hooton TM (1990) The epidemiology of urinary tract infection and the concept of significant bacteriuria. Infection 18(Suppl 2):S40–S43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hummers-Pradier E, Ohse AM, Koch M, Heizmann WR, Kochen MM (2004) Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 42:360–366

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Barnett BJ, Stephens DS (1997) Urinary tract infection: an overview. Am J Med Sci 314:245–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Mrs. Idit Lavie is gratefully acknowledged for her assistance with the statistical processing of the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Colodner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colodner, R., Eliasberg, T., Chazan, B. et al. Clinical significance of bacteriuria with low colony counts of Enterococcus species. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 25, 238–241 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-006-0132-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-006-0132-0

Keywords

Navigation