Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Triple Faeces Test: An Effective Tool for Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Routine Clinical Practice

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microscopic examination of stool specimens is the cornerstone of detection of intestinal parasites in parasitology laboratories. In Europe, fresh, nonpreserved stool specimens are generally used for examination. Because intestinal parasites are shed intermittently, patients are asked to deliver multiple stool samples for examination. The limitation of this diagnostic approach is that detection of the vegetative stages of protozoa may be missed because of delays in processing and/or low compliance with the request to submit multiple stool samples. To overcome this limitation, a diagnostic test that combines multiple sampling (on 3 consecutive days), a fixative (SAF; sodium acetate acetic acid formalin), a concentration method and an easy-to-use permanent stain (chlorazol black dye) was developed for use in routine clinical practice. The results of the test, called the "Triple Faeces Test" (TFT), were compared with those of the conventional diagnostic method, i.e. ether sedimentation of a single fresh stool specimen. Stool samples from 544 patients were examined. Vials from the TFT-sets were filled by patients precisely according to instructions in 462 of 544 (85%) of the cases. Using the conventional method and the TFT, 106 and 209 patients, respectively, were diagnosed with infection by one or more parasitic species (P<0.005). Pathogenic species were detected by the conventional method and by the TFT in 39 and 94 cases, respectively, and nonpathogenic species were detected in 124 and 288 cases, respectively (P<0.05). Additional costs for the sampling device, laboratory reagents and handling of the TFT were acceptable. The results of this study suggest that the TFT is an effective method for detection of intestinal parasites in stool samples in routine clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Danciger M, Lopez M (1975) Numbers of Giardia in the feces of infected children. Am J Trop Med Hyg 24:237–242

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fleck SL, Moody AH (1988) Diagnostic techniques in medical parasitology. Butterworth, London

  3. Cartwright CP (1999) Utility of multiple-stool-specimen ova and parasite examinations in a high-prevalence setting. J Clin Microbiol 37:2408–2411

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Garcia LS, Shimizu RY (1993) Medical parasitology update on diagnostic techniques and laboratory safety. Lab Med 24:81–88

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mank TG, Zaat JO, Blotkamp J, Polderman AM (1995) Comparison of fresh versus sodium acetate acetic acid formalin-preserved stool specimens for diagnosis of intestinal protozoal infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 14:1076–1081

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hiatt RA, Markell EK, Ng E (1995) How many stool examinations are necessary to detect pathogenic intestinal protozoa? Am J Trop Med Hyg 53:36–39

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang J, Scholten T (1977) A fixative for intestinal parasites permitting the use of concentration and permanent staining procedures. Am J Clin Pathol 67:300–304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parasitology Subcommittee/Microbiology Section of Scientific Assembly (1978) Recommended procedures for the examination of clinical specimens for the diagnosis of parasitic infections. Am J Med Tech 44:1101–1106

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pfaller MA, Garcia LS (1997) Parasitology. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH (eds) Manual of clinical microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, pp 1336–1354

  10. Garcia LS, Shimizu RY (1998) Evaluation of intestinal protozoan morphology in human fecal specimens preserved in EcoFix: comparison of Wheatley's trichrome stain and EcoStain. J Clin Microbiol 36:1974–1976

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia LS, Shimizu RY, Shum A, Bruckner DA (1993) Evaluation of intestinal protozoan morphology in polyvinyl alcohol preservative: comparison of zinc sul. J Clin Microbiol 31:307–310

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Junod C (1972) Technique coprologique nouvelle essentiellement destinee a la concentration des trophozoites d'amibes. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales 65:390–398

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palmer J (1991) Modified iron hematoxylin/Kinyoun stain. Clin Microbiol Newslett 13:39–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gleason NN, Healy GR (1965) Modification and evaluation of Kohn's one-step staining technique for intestinal protozoa in feces or tissue. Am J Clin Pathol 43:494–496

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scholten T (1972) An improved technique for the recovery of intestinal protozoa. J Parasitol 58:633–634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ridley DS, Hawgood BC (1956) The value of formol-ether concentration of fecal cysts and ova. J Clin Pathol 9:74–76

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gool T van, Snijders F, Reiss P, et al. (1993) Diagnosis of intestinal and disseminated microsporidial infections in patients with HIV by a new rapid fluorescence technique. J Clin Pathol 46:694–699

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zierdt CH (1991) Pathogenicity of Blastocystis hominis. J Clin Microbiol 29:662–663

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Telalbasic S, Pikula ZP, Kapidzic M (1991) Blastocystis hominis may be a potential cause of intestinal disease. Scand J Infect Dis 23:389–390

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Udkow MP, Markell EK (1993) Blastocystis hominis: prevalence in asymptomatic versus symptomatic hosts. J Infect Dis 168:242–244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stenzel DJ, Boreham PF (1996) Blastocystis hominis revisited. Clin Microbiol Rev 9:563–584

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ulgen Z, Girginkardesler N, Balcioglu C, Ertan P, Pirildar T, Ali Kilimcioglu A (1999) Effect of trimethoprim-sulfamethaxazole in Blastocystis hominis infection. Am J Gastroenterol 94:3245–3247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Poirriez J, Dei CE, Dutoit E, et al. (1983) Examen parasitologique de selles: realisation simultanee des techniques de concentration de Faust, de Janeckso-Urbanyi et de Ritchie. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 41:375–378

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rendtorff RC (1954) The experimental transmission of human intestinal protozoan parasites. Am J Hyg 59:209–220

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marti H, Koella JC (1993) Multiple stool examinations for ova and parasites and rate of false-negative results. J Clin Microbiol 31:3044–3045

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cross JH, Murrell DK, Tsai S (1968) An evaluation of diagnostic techniques in a sample survey for intestinal parasites. Chin J Microbiol 1:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mank TG, Zaat JO, Deelder AM, Eijk JT van, Polderman AM (1997) Sensitivity of microscopy versus enzyme immunoassay in the laboratory diagnosis of giardiasis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 16:615–619

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J.M. Nieuwendijk for excellent technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Parasitology, Department of Medical Microbiology, L1-110, Academic Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    T. van Gool, R. Weijts, E. Lommerse & T. G. Mank

  2. Department of Parasitology, Harbour Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    T. van Gool

  3. Section of Parasitology, Public Health Laboratory, Haarlem, The Netherlands

    T. G. Mank

Authors
  1. T. van Gool
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Weijts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Lommerse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. G. Mank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. van Gool.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Gool, T., Weijts, R., Lommerse, E. et al. Triple Faeces Test: An Effective Tool for Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Routine Clinical Practice. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 22, 284–290 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-003-0919-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-003-0919-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation