Skip to main content
Log in

Kinetic analysis and enzyme concentration effect relevant to dependence of amylolysis of starch granules on specific surface area concentration

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Food Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The kinetics and enzyme concentration effects on the amylolysis of rice, maize, and potato starch granules by porcine pancreatic α-amylase (PPA) were analyzed. The K m values of the native starches, when expressed as a function of surface area concentration, were similar to each other. Inconsistencies in V max values can be attributed to the deviations from real values of the surface area concentration. The deviations were confirmed by that the initial rate differences among the native starches with the same apparent surface area concentration were observed at low enzyme concentrations. Kinetic parameters of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-solubilized native starches showed no significant difference, demonstrating that structural and compositional differences of starches do not affect amylolysis. The resistance of starch granules against amylolysis predominantly affects the V max, and as a result, the k cat is reduced compared with DMSO-solubilized starch. In conclusion, the kinetic analysis and enzyme concentration effect confirmed that surface area concentration mainly affects the initial hydrolysis rate of native starch granules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kong BW, Kim JI, Kim MJ, Kim JC. Porcine pancreatic α-amylase hydrolysis of native starch granules as a function of granule surface area. Biotechnol. Prog. 19: 1162–1166 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim JC, Kong BW, Kim MJ, Lee SH. Amylolytic hydrolysis of native starch granules affected by granule surface area. J. Food Sci. 73: C621–C624 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarian FD, van der Kaaij RM, Kralj S, Wijbenga DJ, Binnema DJ, van der Maarel MJEC, Dijkhuizen L. Enzymatic degradation of granular potato starch by Microbacterium aurum strain B8.A. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 93: 645–654 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Oudjeriouat N, Moreau Y, Santimone M, Svensson B, Marchis-Mouren G, Desseaux V. On the mechanism of α-amylase. Eur. J. Biochem. 270: 3871–3879 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Zhu Q. Activities of starch hydrolytic enzymes and sucrose-phosphate synthase in the stems of rice subjected to water stress during grain filling. J. Exp. Bot. 52: 2169–2179 (2001)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blazek J, Gilbert EP. Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on native starch granule structure. Biomacromolecules 11: 3275–3289 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goesaert H, Bijttebier A, Delcour JA. Hydrolysis of amylopectin by amylolytic enzymes: Level of inner chain attack as an important analytical differentiation criterion. Carbohydr. Res. 345: 397–401 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Meireles EA, Carneiro CNB, DaMatta RA, Samuels RI, Silva CP. Digestion of starch granules from maize, potato and wheat by larvae of the the yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor and the Mexican bean weevil, Zabrotes subfasciatus. J. Insect Sci. 9: 1–8 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qin F, Man J, Xu B, Hu M, Gu M, Liu Q, Wei C. Structural properties of hydrolyzed high-amylose rice starch by α-amylase from Bacillus licheniformis. J. Agr. Food Chem. 59: 12667–12673 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tawil G, Jamme F, Réfrégiers M, Viksø-Nielsen A, Colonna P, Buléon A. In situ tracking of enzymatic breakdown of starch granules by synchrotron UV fluorescence microscopy. Anal. Chem. 83: 989–993 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Franco CML, do Rio Preto SJ, Ciacco CF. Factors that affect the enzymatic degradation of natural starch granules — effect of the size of the granules. Starch-Starke 44: 422–426 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tahir R, Ellis PR, Butterworth PJ. The relation of physical properties of native starch granules to the kinetics of amylolysis catalysed by porcine pancreatic α-amylase. Carbohyd. Polym. 81: 57–62 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tester R, Qi X, Karkalas J. Hydrolysis of native starches with amylases. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 130: 39–54 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mukerjea R, Mukerjea R, Robyt JF. Controlled peeling of the surfaces of starch granules by gelatinization in aqueous dimethyl sulfoxide at selected temperatures. Carbohyd. Res. 341: 757–765 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fox JD, Robyt JF. Miniaturization of three carbohydrate analyses using a microsample plate reader. Anal. Biochem. 195: 93–96 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kramhoft B, Bak-Jensen KS, Mori H, Juge N, Nohr J, Svensson B. Involvement of individual subsites and secondary substrate binding sites in multiple attack on amylose by barley α-amylase. Biochemistry 44: 1824–1832 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mclaren AD. Enzyme reactions in structurally restricted systems. IV. The digestion of insoluble substrates by hydrolytic enzymes. Enzymologia 26: 237–246 (1963)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Slaughter SL, Ellis PR, Butterworth PJ. An investigation of the action of porcine pancreatic α-amylase on native and gelatinised starches. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1525: 29–36 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Cherl Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, MJ., Jung, YJ., Lee, S.H. et al. Kinetic analysis and enzyme concentration effect relevant to dependence of amylolysis of starch granules on specific surface area concentration. Food Sci Biotechnol 23, 475–481 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-014-0065-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-014-0065-9

Keywords

Navigation