Skip to main content
Log in

Are Gabor phases really useless for face recognition?

  • Theoretical Advances
  • Published:
Pattern Analysis and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gabor features have been recognized as one of the best representations for face recognition. Usually, only the magnitudes of the Gabor coefficients are thought of as being useful for face recognition, while the phases of the Gabor features are deemed to be useless and thus usually ignored by face recognition researchers. However, in this paper, our findings show that the latter should be reconsidered. By encoding Gabor phases through local binary patterns and local histograms, we have achieved very impressive recognition results, which are comparable to those of Gabor magnitudes-based methods. The results of our experiments also indicate that, by combining the phases with the magnitudes, higher accuracy can be achieved. Such observations suggest that more attention should be paid to the Gabor phases for face recognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhao W, Chellappa R, Phillips P, Rosenfeld A (2003) Face recognition: a literature survey. ACM Comput Surv 35(4):399–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Phillips PJ, Grother P, Micheals RJ, Blackburn DM, Tabassi E, Bone JM (2003) Face recognition vendor test 2002 results. Evaluation Report

  3. Phillips PJ, Syed HM, Rizvi A, Rauss PJ (2000) The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms. IEEE Trans PAMI 22(10):1090–1104

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shan S, Gao W, Chang Y, Cao B, Yang P (2004) Review the strength of Gabor features for recognition from the angle of its robustness to mis-alignment. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR2004), vol 1, pp 338–341

  5. Lades M, Vorbruggen J, Buhmann J, Lange J, Cvd Malsburg, Wurtz R, Konen W (1993) Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Trans Comput 42(3):300–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wiskott L, Fellous JN, Kruger N, Cvd Malsburg (1997) Face recogniton by elastic bunch graph matching. IEEE Trans PAMI 19(7):775–779

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu C, Wechsler H (2002) Gabor feature based classification using the enhanced Fisher linear discriminant model for face recognition. IEEE Trans IP 11(4):467–476

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shan S, Yang P, Chen X, Gao W (2005) AdaBoost Gabor Fisher classifier for face recognition. In: Proceedings of international workshop on analysis and modeling of faces and gestures (AMFG 2005), LNCS 3723, pp 278–291

  9. Shen L, Bai L (2006) A review on Gabor wavelets for face recognition. Pattern Anal Appl 9(10):273–292

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Tao D, Li X, Wu X, Maybank SJ (2007) General tensor discriminant analysis and Gabor features for gait recognition. IEEE Trans PAMI 29(10):1700–1715

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li X, Maybank SJ, Yan S, Tao D, Xu D (2008) Gait components and their application to gender recognition. IEEE Trans SMC-C 38(2):145–155

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Daugman J (2004) How iris recognition works? IEEE Trans CSVT 14(1):21–30

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang W, Shan S, Gao W, Chen X, Zhang H (2005) Local Gabor binary pattern histogram sequence (LGBPHS): a novel non-statistical model for face representation and recognition. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV2005), pp 786–791

  14. Ahonen T, Hadid A, Pietikäinen M (2004) Face recognition with local binary patterns. In: Proceeding of European conference on computer vision (ECCV2004), LNCS 3021, pp 469–481

  15. Hadjidemetriou E, Grossberg MD, Nayar SK (2004) Multiresolution histograms and their use for recognition. IEEE Trans PAMI 26(7):831–847

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ojala T, Pietikäinen M, Harwood D (1996) A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distribution. Pattern Recognit 29(1):51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ojala T, Pietikäinen M, Mäenpää T (2002) Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans PAMI 24(7):971–987

    Google Scholar 

  18. Swain M, Ballard D (1991) Color indexing. Int J Comput Vis 7(1):11–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Duda R, Hart P, Stork D (2001) Pattern classification, 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is partially sponsored by the Natural Science Foundation of China under contract nos. 60332010, 60673091, and 60772071, “100 Talents Program” of CAS, Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China (nos. 2006AA01Z122 and 2007AA01Z163), and ISVISION Technologies Co., Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiguang Shan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Shan, S., Qing, L. et al. Are Gabor phases really useless for face recognition?. Pattern Anal Applic 12, 301–307 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-008-0123-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-008-0123-0

Keywords

Navigation