Abstract
Purpose
Clinical performance of hernia mesh devices is poorly understood due to a lack of relevant clinical trial and real-world data (RWD). Registries offer a means to capture longitudinal data in real-world practice. This report highlights the need for data quality, completeness, and appropriate analysis methodology for more accurate and informed interpretation of RWE of medical devices.
Methods
Hernia mesh registry data were used to cross-tabulate the 30-day infection rate of patients who received one of four mesh types.
Results
Initial data review suggested lower infection rate for permanent mesh versus absorbable mesh. Additional registry RWD were factored into the analysis, providing more context in the interpretation of the results.
Conclusions
High-quality registries can be used to generate real-world evidence (RWE) to support surveillance and other regulatory decisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2017) Use of real-world evidence to support regulatory decision-making for medical devices. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Maryland
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2018) MedSun: Medical Product Safety Network. https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/MedSunMedicalProductSafetyNetwork/default.htm. Accessed 5 Feb 2018
Baylon K, Rodriguez-Camarillo P, Elias-Zuniga A, Diaz-Elizondo JA, Gilkerson R, Lozano K (2017) Past, present and future of surgical meshes: a review. Membranes. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes7030047
Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, Beck W, Holzman MD (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16(2):179–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9
Poulose BK, Roll S, Murphy JW, Matthews BD, Todd Heniford B, Voeller G, Hope WW, Goldblatt MI, Adrales GL, Rosen MJ (2016) Design and implementation of the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC): improving value in hernia care. Hernia 20(2):177–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1477-7
Schwab R, Dietz UA, Menzel S, Wiegering A (2018) Pitfalls in interpretation of large registry data on hernia repair. Hernia 22(6):947–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1837-6
Thygesen LC, Ersbøll AK (2014) When the entire population is the sample: strengths and limitations in register-based epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 29(8):551–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-013-9873-0
Lawson EH, Zingmond DS, Hall BL, Louie R, Brook RH, Ko CY (2015) Comparison between clinical registry and medicare claims data on the classification of hospital quality of surgical care. Ann Surg 261(2):290–296. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000707
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2018) Medical device safety action plan: protecting patients, promoting public health. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Maryland
Funding
No funds or support has been received for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
For this type of study ethical approval is not required.
Human and animal rights
There are no human and animal rights issue to declare.
Informed consent
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, TH., Choudhuri, A., Ulisney, K. et al. Use of real-world registry data: a hernia mesh example. Hernia 24, 587–590 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02085-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02085-6