Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biocompatibility of bulk-fill resins in vitro

  • Research
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of three different extracts obtained from Filtek™ One Bulk Fill, Tetric Evoceram® Bulk Fill and Coltene Fill-Up! resins.

Materials and methods

The cytotoxicity was determined on 3T3 fibroblast cells using the MTT and crystal violet assays. The genotoxicity was determined using a cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay.

Results

The cytotoxicity of the resin extracts on 3T3 mouse fibroblasts was found to be dose-dependent with both the MTT and crystal violet assays. Extracts concentrated above 1% were cytotoxic according to the MTT assay. The Filtek™ One Bulk Fill, Tetric Evoceram® Bulk Fill, and Coltene Fill-Up! resins reached the LD50 at concentrations of 60%, 50%, and 20%, respectively, and showed genotoxicity rates that were 2–5 times, 3–8 times, and 4–15 times higher than the negative control, respectively.

Conclusions

Coltene Fill-Up! resin extracts were the most cytotoxic and genotoxic, followed by Tetric Evoceram® Bulk Fill and Filtek™ One Bulk Fill.

Clinical relevance

The analyzed bulk-fill resins showed differences in in vitro biocompatibility, and the Filtek™ One Bulk Fill was found to be the safest for clinical use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dionysopoulos D, Gerasimidou O (2021) Wear of contemporary dental composite resin restorations: a literature review. Restor Dent Endod 46(2):1–13. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Meereis CTW, Münchow EA, Rosa WLO, Silva AF, Piva E (2018) Polymerization shrinkage stress of resin-based dental materials: a systematic review and meta-analyses of composition strategies. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 82:268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.03.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Małkiewicz K, Wychowański P, Olkowska-Truchanowicz J, Tykarska M, Czerwiński M, Wilczko M, Owoc A (2017) Uncompleted polymerization and cytotoxicity of dental restorative materials as potential health risk factors. Ann Agric Environ Med 24(4):618–623. https://doi.org/10.5604/12321966.1235159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cender EU, Guler C, Odabasi D (2021) The effects of polymerization mode and layer thickness on monomer released from bulk fill composite resins. Niger J Clin Pract 24(10):1442–1449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rizzante FAP, Mondelli RFL, Furuse AY, Borges AFS, Mendonça G, Ishikiriama SK (2019) Shrinkage stress and elastic modulus assessment of bulk-fill composites. J Appl Oral Sci 27:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moura AGSM, Melo MGRR, Santos WTNP, Bezerra ALCA, Monteiro GQM, Durão MA (2021) An in vitro evaluation of the color stability of bulk-fill resin composites. Arch Health Invest 10(4):530–535. https://doi.org/10.21270/archi.v10i4.4973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tauböck TT, Jäger F, Attin T (2018) Polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage force kinetics of high- and low-viscosity dimethacrylate- and ormocerbased bulk-fill resin composites. Odontology 107(1):103–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0369-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gonçalves F, Campos LMP, Rodrigues-Júnior EC, Costa FV, Marques PA, Francci CE, Braga RR, Boaro LCC (2018) A comparative study of bulk-fill composites: degree of conversion, post-gel shrinkage and cytotoxicity. Braz Oral Res 32(17):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tauböck TT, Marovic D, Zeljezic D, Steingruber AD, Attin T, Tarle Z (2017) Genotoxic potential of dental bulk-fill resin composites. Dent Mater 33(7):788–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haugen HJ, Marovic D, Par M, Thieu MKL, Reseland JE, Johnsen GF (2020) Bulk fill composites have similar performance to conventional dental composites. Int J Mol Sci 21(14):1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tardem C, Albuquerque EG, Lopes LS, Marins SS, Calazans FS, Poubel LA, Barcelos R, Barceleiro MO (2019) Clinical time and postoperative sensitivity after use of bulk-fill (syringe and capsule) vs. incremental filling composites: a randomized clinical trial. Res Braz Oral 33(0):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0089

  12. Huang B, Sadeghinejad L, Adebayo OIA, Ma D, Xiao Y, Siqueira WL, Cvitkovitch DG, Finer Y (2018) Gene expression and protein synthesis of esterase from Streptococcus mutans are affected by biodegradation by-product from methacrylate resin composites and adhesives. Acta Biomater 81:158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.050

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Girão LB, Martins JOL, Lemos JVM, Pinto MR, Rolim JPML, Silva FCFA, Saboia VPA, Sousa FB, Silva PGB (2020) Influence of the degree of conversion and Bis-GMA residues of bulk fill resins on tissue toxicity in na subcutaneous model in rats. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 18:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2280800020947330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maalekipour M, Safari M, Barekatain M, Fathi A (2021) Effect of adhesive resin as a modeling liquid on elution of resin composite restorations. Int J Dent 3178536:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3178536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Paolone G, Madurino M, Scotti N, Cantatore G, Blatz MB (2023) Color stability of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-based composites: a scoping review. J Esthet Restor Dent 35(4):657–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Demirel G, Gür G, Demirsoy FF, Altuntas EG, Yener-Ílce B, Kiliçarslan MA (2020) Cytotoxic effects of contemporary bulk-fill dental composites: a real-time cell analysis. Dent Mater J 39(1):101–110. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nascimento AS, Lima DB, Fook MVL, Albuquerque MS, Lima EA, Sabino MA, Borges SMP, Filgueira PTD, Sousa YC, Braz R (2018) Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin. Braz Oral Res 32(107):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schweikl H, Spagnuolo G, Schmalz G (2006) Genetic and cellular toxicology of dental resin monomers. J Dent Res 85(10):870–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608501001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2009) 10993-5: biological evaluation of medical devices. In: Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/36406.html/#stages

  20. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2021) 10993-12: biological evaluation of medical devices. In: Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/75769.html

  21. Bandarra S, Mascarenhas P, Luís AR, Catrau M, Bekman E, Ribeiro AC, Félix S, Caldeira J, Barahona I (2020) In vitro and in silico evaluations of resin-based dental restorative material toxicity. Clin Oral Investig 24(8):2691–2700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03131-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bandarra S, Fernandes AS, Magro I, Guerreiro PS, Pingarilho M, Churchwell MI, Gil OM, Batinic-Haberle I, Goncalves S, Rueff J, Miranda JP, Marques MM, Beland FA, Castro M, Gaspar JF, Oliveira NG (2013) Mechanistic insights into the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity induced by glycidamide in human mammary cells. Mutagenesis 28(6):721–729. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/get052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee SM, Kim SY, Kim JH, Jun SK, Kim HW, Lee JH, Lee HH (2019) Depth-dependent cellular response from dental bulk-fill resins in human dental pulp stem cells. Stem Cells Int 1251536:111. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1251536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chaharom MEE, Bahari M, Safyari L, Safarvand H, Shafaei H, Navimipour EJ, Oskoee PA, Ajami AA, Kahnamouei MA (2020) Effect of preheating on the cytotoxicity of bulk-fill composite resins. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 14(1):19–25. https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2020.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kamalak H, Kamalak A, Taghizadehghalehjoughi A, Hacımüftüoğlu A, Nalci KA (2018) Cytotoxic and biological effects of bulk fill composites on rat cortical neuron cells. Odontology 106(4):377–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0354-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lempel E, Czibulya Z, Kovács B, Szalma J, Tóth Á, Kunsági-Máté S, Varga Z, Böddi K (2016) Degree of conversion and BisGMA, TEGDMA, UDMA elution from flowable bulk fill compo-sites. Int J Mol Sci 17(5):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rincón G, Sánchez C (2021) Short assay design for micronucleus detection in human lymphocytes. BioMed Res Int 322257:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2322257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sommer S, Buraczewska I, Kruszewski M (2020) Micronucleus assay: the state of art, and future directions. Int J Mol Sci 21(4):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bandarra S, Neves J, Paraíso A, Mascarenhas P, Ribeiro AC, Barahona I (2021) Biocompatibility of self-adhesive resin cement with fibroblast cells. J Prosthet Dent 125(4):705.e1-705.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.0022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Egas Moniz CRL funded this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C. J. and I. B. wrote the main manuscript and P. M. and M. A. prepared figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Barahona.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Junqueira, C., Mascarenhas, P., Avelar, M. et al. Biocompatibility of bulk-fill resins in vitro. Clin Oral Invest 27, 7851–7858 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05376-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05376-6

Keywords

Navigation