Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thermographic examination of gingival phenotypes: correlation between morphological and thermal parameters

  • Research
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the clinical and thermographic aspects of the gingival phenotype (GP) in healthy subjects.

Materials and methods

The study sample examined 264 teeth, upper and lower incisors, comprising 132 central incisors (CI) and 132 lateral incisors (LI), in 33 healthy volunteers. Four periodontal parameters were recorded systematically: ratio of width to length of the dental crown (CW/CL), height of the gingival attachment (KGW), probing depth (PD), and gingival transparency (GT). The temperatures of the attached gingiva (KGW temp) and the free gingival margin (FGM Temp) were also recorded by way of infrared thermography (IRT).

Results

The average age of the sample was 30.70 ± 7.65 years. Of the 264 teeth evaluated, 76.1% had a thin GP. There was a significant association between CW/CL (p < 0.001), KGW (p < 0.001), PD (p < 0.007), and FGM Temp (p < 0.006) with the tooth groups. The results show a significant and inversely proportional correlation between clinical parameters and gingival temperature (p < 0.05). A significant association was found between CW/CL (p < 0.026); KGW (p < 0.001); and GP.

Conclusion

CW/CL, KGW, PD, and FGM Temp vary according to tooth group. The majority of the sample presented with the thin GP, which was more prevalent in the lower LIs and CIs. No significant association could be observed between thermographic parameters and GP.

Clinical relevance

Knowledge of the temperature of the gingival tissues can be useful in helping to diagnose and plan periodontal treatments. Moreover, our findings will help future studies evaluate the use of IR as an auxiliary diagnostic method in dentistry, eliminating GP as a confounding factor, since it does not seem to influence the temperature of the gingival tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the conclusions of this study are available in the article and from the corresponding author, N.B.M., upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, Bissada NF, Bouchard P, Cortellini P et al (2018) Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol 45:S219–S229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Steffens JP, Marcantonio RAC (2018) Classificação das doenças e condições periodontais e peri-implantares 2018: guia prático e pontos-chave. Rev Odontol UNESP 47:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yin XJ, Wei BY, Ke XP, Zhang T, Jiang MY, Luo XY, Sun HQ (2020) Correlation between clinical parameters of crown and gingival morphology of anterior teeth and periodontal biotypes. BMC Oral Health 20(1):59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1040-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Araújo LNMD, Borges SB, Medeiros I, Amorim ACDM, Barbosa CV, Gurgel BCDV (2018) Determinação do biótipo periodontal através da análise de fotografias intra-orais. Rev Odontol UNESP 47:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zweers J, Thomas RZ, Slot DE, Weisgold AS, Van der Weijden FG (2014) Characteristics of periodontal biotype, its dimensions, associations and prevalence: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 41(10):958–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ranjith A, Preeja C, Archana V (2014) Gingival biotype and its clinical significance—a review. Abraham S, Deepak KT, Saudi J Dent Res 5:3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Adhikary R, Mohan P, Wadhawan A, Tyagi P (2023) Gingival augmentation in the thin phenotype using injectable platelet-rich fibrin and microneedling. Cureus. 15(6):e40435. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40435

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Romano L, Paolantonio M, De Ninis P, Saleh MHA, Sinjari B, Xhajanka E, Femminella B, Wang HL, Ravidá A (2023) Minimally invasive gingival phenotype modification in gingival recession associated with a non-carious cervical lesion using the root plastique technique: A quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest study. J Periodontol 94(5):641–651. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.22-0414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim DM, Bassir SH, Nguyen TT (2020) Effect of gingival phenotype on the maintenance of periodontal health: an American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol 91(3):311–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kao RT, Curtis DA, Kim DM, Lin GH, Wang CW, Cobb CM et al (2020) American Academy of Periodontology best evidence consensus statement on modifying periodontal phenotype in preparation for orthodontic and restorative treatment. J Periodontol 91(3):289–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.19-0577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fawzy M, Hosny M, El-Nahass H (2023) Evaluation of esthetic outcome of delayed implants with de-epithelialized free gingival graft in thin gingival phenotype with or without immediate temporization: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Implant Dent 9(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00468-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kao RT, Pasquinelli K (2002) Thick vs. thin gingival tissue: a key determinant in tissue response to disease and restorative treatment. J Calif Dent Assoc 30(7):521–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424396.2002.12223300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Santamaria P, Paolantonio M, Romano L, Serroni M, Rexhepi I, Secondi L, Paolantonio G, Sinjari B, De Ninis P, Femminella B (2023) Gingival phenotype changes after different periodontal plastic surgical techniques: a single-masked randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 27(7):3423–3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04944-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Claffey N, Shanley D (1986) Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 13(7):654–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kois JC (2001) Predictable single tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent 22(3):199–206 quiz 208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mandelaris GA, Neiva R, Chambrone L (2017) Cone-beam computed tomography and interdisciplinary dentofacial therapy: an American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review focusing on risk assessment of the dentoalveolar bone changes influenced by tooth movement. J Periodontol 88(10):960–977. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2017.160781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang M, Li C, Yang W, Chen C, Chung CH, Tanna N, Zheng Z (2023) Accurate gingival segmentation from 3D images with artificial intelligence: an animal pilot study. Prog Orthod 24(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-023-00465-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J (2009) The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 36(5):428–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Januario AL, Barriviera M, Duarte WR (2008) Soft tissue cone-beam computed tomography: a novel method for the measurement of gingival tissue and the dimensions of the dentogingival unit. J Esthet Restor Dent 20(6):366–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gkogkos A, Kloukos D, Koukos G, Liapis G, Sculean A, Katsaros C (2020) Clinical and radiographic gingival thickness assessment at mandibular incisors: an ex vivo study. Oral Health Prev Dent 18(3):607–617

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Müller HP, Eger T (1997) Gingival phenotypes in young male adults. J Clin Periodontol 24(1):65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aguilar-Duran L, Mir-Mari J, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E (2020) Is measurement of the gingival biotype reliable? Agreement among different assessment methods. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 25(1):e144. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rytivaara R, Näpänkangas R, Kainulainen T, Sipola A, Kallio-Pulkkinen S, Raustia A, Thevenot J (2021) Thermographic findings related to facial pain–a survey of 40 subjects. CRANIO®, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brioschi ML, Teixeira MJ, Silva FM, Colman D (2010) Princípios e indicações da termografia médica. Andreoli, São Paulo, p 280

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nicandro CR, Efrén MM, Maria Yaneli AA, Enrique MDCM, Hector Gabriel AM, Nancy PC et al (2013) Evaluation of the diagnostic power of thermography in breast cancer using Bayesian network classifiers. Comput Math Methods Med 2013:264246. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/264246

  26. Anbar M (1995) Mechanisms of local hypothermia and hyperthermia: an overview. Thermol Osterr 3:108

    Google Scholar 

  27. Iosif L, Murariu-MᾸgureanu C, Preoteasa E, Bărbînţă-Pătraşcu ME, Preoteasa CT (2021) Infrared radiation in dentistry; measuring heat emission through passive method of thermography. Romanian J Phys 66:704

    Google Scholar 

  28. Haddad DS, Brioschi ML, Baladi MG, Arita ES (2016) A new evaluation of heat distribution on facial skin surface by infrared thermography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 45(4):20150264

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Magalhaes C, Mendes J, Vardasca R (2021) Meta-analysis and systematic review of the application of machine learning classifiers in biomedical applications of infrared thermography. Appl Sci 11:842. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mukherjee S (1978) (1978) The temperature of the gingival sulci. J Periodontol 49(11):580–584. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1978.49.11.580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brill N, Maeda T, Stoltze K (1978) Does a temperature gradient exist across the mucogingival junction? J Oral Rehabil 5(1):81–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Molnár E, Lohinai Z, Demeter A, Mikecs B, Tóth Z, Vág J (2015) Assessment of heat provocation tests on the human gingiva: the effect of periodontal disease and smoking. Acta Physiol Hungarica 102(2):176–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Haffajee AD, Socransky SS, Goodson JM (1992) Subgingival temperature (I). Relation to baseline clinical parameters. J Clin Periodontol 19(6):401–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Niederman R, Naleway C, Lu B-Y, Buyle-Bodin Y, Robinson P (1995) Subgingival temperature as a gingival inflammatory indicator. J Clin Periodontol 22(10):804–809. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1995.tb00264.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Holthuis AF, Chebib FS (1983) Observations on temperature and temperature patterns of the gingiva: I. The effect of arch, region and health. J Periodontol 54(10):624–628. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1983.54.10.624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Komoriyama M, Nomoto R, Tanaka R et al (2003) Application of thermography in dentistry-visualization of temperature distribution on oral tissues. Dent Mater J 22:436–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pan American Journal of Medical Thermology (2019) Guidelines for dental-oral and systemic health infrared thermography. Pan Am J Med Thermol 5:41–55

    Google Scholar 

  38. International Academy of Clinical Thermology - IACT (2002) Thermology guidelines, standards and protocols in clinical thermography imaging. International Academy of Clinical Thermology IACT, pp 1–9. Available at: https://www.iact-org.org/professionals/thermog-guidelines.html

  39. Fernández-Cuevas I, Marins JCB, Lastras JA, Carmona PMG, Cano SP, García-Concepción MÁ, Sillero-Quintana M (2015) Classification of factors influencing the use of infrared thermography in humans: a review. Infrared Phys Technol 71:28–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Aires Júnior FAF (2018) Optimization of the methodological process for the acquisition of thermographic images of the face. 95p. Thesis (Doctorate in Process Engineering) – Postgraduate Program in Process Engineering, Science and Technology Center, Federal University of Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil. Available at: http://dspace.sti.ufcg.edu.br:8080/jspui/handle/riufcg/1598

  41. Barbosa JS, Amorim AMAM, Arruda MJALLA, Medeiros GBS, Freitas APLF, Vieira LEM et al (2020) Infrared thermography assessment of patients with temporomandibular disorders. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 49(4):20190392

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Woźniak K, Szyszka-Sommerfeld L, Trybek G, Piątkowska D (2015) Assessment of the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of thermography in identifying patients with TMD. Med Sci Monitor: Int Med J Exp Clin Res 21:1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dibai-Filho AV, Packer AC, de Souza Costa AC, Rodrigues-Bigaton D (2014) The chronicity of myogenous temporomandibular disorder changes the skin temperature over the anterior temporalis muscle. J Bodyw Mov Ther 18(3):430–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rodrigues-Bigaton D, Dibai-Filho AV, Packer AC, de Souza Costa AC, de Castro EM (2014) Accuracy of two forms of infrared image analysis of the masticatory muscles in the diagnosis of myogenous temporomandibular disorder. J Bodyw Mov Ther 18(1):49–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Usamentiaga R, Venegas P, Guerediaga J, Vega L, Molleda J, Bulnes FG (2014) Infrared thermography for temperature measurement and non-destructive testing. Sensors 14:12305–12348. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140712305

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Olsson M, Lindhe J (1991) Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors. J Clin Periodontol 18(1):78–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC (2003) Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol 74(4):557–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  49. Müller HP, Schaller N, Eger T, Heinecke A (2000) Thickness of masticatory mucosa. J Clin Periodontol 27(6):431–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stellini E, Comuzzi L, Mazzocco F, Parente N, Gobbato L (2013) Relationships between different tooth shapes and patient’s periodontal phenotype. J Periodontal Res 48(5):657–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Joshi N, Agarwal MC, Madan E, Gupta S, Law A (2016) Gingival biotype and gingival bioform: determining factors for periodontal disease progression and treatment outcome. Int J Sci Stud 4(3):220–225

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chou YH, Tsai CC, Wang JC, Ho YP, Ho KY, Tseng CC (2008) New classification of crown forms and gingival characteristics in Taiwanese. Open Dent J 2:114

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Alhajj WA (2020) Gingival phenotypes and their relation to age, gender and other risk factors. BMC Oral Health 20(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Shah R, Sowmya NK, Mehta DS (2015) Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to clinical parameters. Contemp Clin Dentist 6(Suppl 1):S167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Smith DH (2010) Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodont Restor Dentist 30(3):237–243

  56. Lee SP, Kim TI, Kim HK, Shon WJ, Park YS (2013) Discriminant analysis for the thin periodontal biotype based on the data acquired from three-dimensional virtual models of Korean young adults. J Periodontol 84(11):1638–1645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Fischer KR, Büchel J, Kauffmann F, Heumann C, Friedmann A, Schmidlin PR (2021) Gingival phenotype distribution in young Caucasian women and men—an investigative study. Clin Exp Dental Res 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.482

  58. Stein JM, Lintel-Höping N, Hammächer C, Kasaj A, Tamm M, Hanisch O (2013) The gingival biotype: measurement of soft and hard tissue dimensions-a radiographic morphometric study. J Clin Periodontol 40(12):1132–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Vlachodimou E, Fragkioudakis I, Vouros I (2021) Is there an association between the gingival phenotype and the width of keratinized gingiva? A systematic review. Dentist J 9(3):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9030034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Müller HP, Könönen E (2005) Variance components of gingival thickness. J Periodontal Res 40(3):239–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00798.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Pascual A, Barallat L, Santos A, Levi P Jr, Vicario M, Nart J et al (2017) Comparison of periodontal biotypes between maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Periodont Restor Dentist 37(4):533–539. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2848

  62. Eger T, Müller HP, Heinecke A (1996) Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness: subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features. J Clin Periodontol 23(9):839–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Zaproudina N, Varmavuo V, Airaksinen O, Närhi M (2008) Reproducibility of infrared thermography measurements in healthy individuals. Physiol Meas 29(4):515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Harrap MJ, Hempel de Ibarra N, Whitney HM, Rands SA (2018) Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature. Royal Soc Open Sci 5(12):181281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. ISO (2008) Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines–Thermography– Part 1: General procedures -18434-1:2008. International Organization for Standardization (1):1–24. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/41648.html

  66. Nakamoto T, Kanao M, Kondo Y, Kajiwara N, Masaki C, Takahashi T, Hosokawa R (2012) Two-dimensional real-time blood flow and temperature of soft tissue around maxillary anterior implants. Implant Dent 21(6):522–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Barnett ML, Gilman RM, Charles CH, Bartels LL (1989) Computer–based thermal imaging of human gingiva: preliminary investigation. J Periodontol 60(11):628–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Cortellini P, Bissada NF (2018) Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol 89:S204–S213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Shao Y, Yin L, Gu J, Wang D, Lu W, Sun Y (2018) Assessment of periodontal biotype in a young Chinese population using different measurement methods. Sci Rep 8(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Motta SG, Camacho MF, Quintela DC, Santana RB (2017) Relationship between clinical and histologic periodontal biotypes in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 37(5):737–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Mikecs B, Vág J, Gerber G, Molnár B, Feigl G, Shahbazi A (2021) Revisiting the vascularity of the keratinized gingiva in the maxillary esthetic zone. BMC Oral Health 21(1):160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01445

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Davanzo GG, Canova F, Grassi-Kassisse DM (2015) [Des]-[re]-[hiper]-hidratação. Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia do Exercício 14(2):103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Baab DA, Öberg Å, Lundström Å (1990) Gingival blood flow and temperature changes in young humans with a history of periodontitis. Arch Oral Biol 35(2):95–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Nilsson LA (1987) Blood flow, temperature and heat loss of skin exposed to local radiative and convective cooling. J moesf Dermat 88:586593

    Google Scholar 

  75. Malpartida-Carrillo V, Tinedo-Lopez PL, Guerrero ME, Amaya-Pajares SP, Özcan M, Rösing CK (2020) Periodontal phenotype: a review of historical and current classifications evaluating different methods and characteristics. J Esthet Restor Dent 33(3):432–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Kloukos D, Kakali L, Koukos G, Sculean A, Stavropoulos A, Katsaros C (2021) Gingival thickness assessment at mandibular incisors of orthodontic patients with ultrasound and cone-beam CT. A cross-sectional study. Oral Health Prev Dent 19(1):263–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financed by CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.B.M., R.S.C.S., and P.M.B conceived and designed of study; N.B.M., L.N.S.D., and C.M.V.P. acquired of clinical data; N.B.M., J.S.B., and A.M.G.S. analyzed and interpreted of data collected; N.B.M., R.S.C.S, and P.M.B. drew of article and critical revision; N.B.M. and P.M.B and all authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niebla Bezerra de Melo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the local committee of ethics in research under the protocol number: CAAE 40371920.1.0000.5187. A signed written informed consent form was obtained from each patient sampled in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical statement

All the ethical precepts of research in Brazil have been complied with in accordance with article 14, chapter II of Resolution 466/12, having been submitted for the evaluation of the research ethics committee.

Informed consent

The prior signing of consent forms was required from all participants in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bezerra de Melo, N., Sobreira Duarte, L.N., Maia Vieira Pereira, C. et al. Thermographic examination of gingival phenotypes: correlation between morphological and thermal parameters. Clin Oral Invest 27, 7705–7714 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05361-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05361-z

Keywords

Navigation