Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of immersion towards place presence in virtual heritage environments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the advancement of digital technology in virtual heritage (VH) projects, there is still a paucity of research in methods to support sense of place in architectural virtual heritage environment (VHE). This paper argues that studies on the sensation of place in a virtual environment (VE) could be linked to the ever-expanding presence research domain. The impact of the level of immersion and realism in VE towards evoking the sense of presence could be considered to be one of the most discussed topics in presence research. This paper presents the methods and findings from a qualitative experiment designed to analyse user’s real-time feedbacks from three levels of immersive systems. The experiment aims to measure the significance of virtual presence in contributing towards user’s sense of place experience in a VHE. Based on the findings, the system that produces a better virtual presence such as HMD may not be suitable for all type of users even if it delivers better learning experience of cultural heritage places. It may, however, only be determined by personal preferences and immersive device factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kenderdine S, Shaw J, Favero DD, Brown N (2008) Place-Hampi: co-evolutionary narrative and augmented stereographic panoramas, Vijayanagara, India. In: Kalay YE, Kvan T, Affleck J (eds) New heritage: new media and cultural heritage. Routledge, New York, pp 275–293

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hornstein S (2011) Losing site : architecture, memory, and place. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kalay YE (2008) Introduction: preserving cultural heritage through digital media. In: Kalay YE, Kvan T, Affleck J (eds) New heritage: new media and cultural heritage. Routledge, New York, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Malpas J (2008) Cultural heritage in the age of new media. In: Kalay YE, Kvan T, Affleck J (eds) New heritage: new media and cultural heritage. Routledge, New York, pp 13–26

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gearey BR, Chapman HP (2006) ‘Digital Gardening’: an approach to simulating elements of palaeovegetation and some implications for the interpretation of prehistoric sites and landscapes. In: Evans TL, Chapman HP (eds) Digital archaeology: bridging method and theory. Routledge, Oxon, pp 154–172

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morison B (2002) On location: Aristotle’s concept of place. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Malpas J (2006) Heidegger’s topology: being, place, world. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Janz B (2005) Whistler’s fog and the aesthetics of place. Reconstr Stud Contemp Cult 5(3):1-25. http://reconstruction.eserver.org/053/janz.shtml

  9. Shamai S, Ilatov Z (2005) Measuring sense of place: methodological aspects. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 96(5):467–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00479.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Steele F (1981) The sense of place. CBI Publishing Company, Inc., Boston

    Google Scholar 

  11. Norberg-Schulz C (1984) Genius loci: towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Canter D (1977) The psychology of place. The Architectural Press Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Malpas J (1999) Place and experience: a philosophical topography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Relph E (1976) Place and placelessness. Pion, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jorgensen BS, Stedman RC (2006) A comparative analysis of predictors of sense of place dimensions: attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore properties. J Environ Manag 79(3):316–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cross JE (2001) What is sense of place? http://www.western.edu/headwaters/archivesheadwaters12_papers/cross_paper.html. Accessed June 15 2010

  17. Cresswell T (2011) Place: part I. In: Agnew JA, Duncan JS (eds) The Wiley-Blackwell companion to human geography, 1st edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  18. Puren K, Drewes E, Roos V (2006) An exploration of sense of place as informative for spatial planning guidelines: a case study of the Vredefort dome world heritage site, South Africa. Int J Hum Soc Sci 1(3):190–197

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lewicka M (2011) Place attachment: how far have we come in the last 40 years? J Environ Psychol 31(3):207–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghani I, Rahman NA, Nayan NM, Bahaluddin A (2018) Experiential virtual urban environments: a preliminary investigation. Plan Malays 16(1):25–37. https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v16.i5.408

  21. Lessiter J, Freeman J, Keogh E, Davidoff J (2001) A cross-media presence questionnaire: the ITC-sense of presence inventory. Presence Teleop Virt 10(3):282–297. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. MacIntyre B, Bolter JD, Gandy M (2004) Presence and the aura of meaningful places. Paper presented at the 7th annual international workshop on PRESENCE (PRESENCE 2004), Valencia, 13-15 October 2004

  23. Steuer J (1992) Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J Commun 42(4):73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Meehan M, Insko B, Whitton M, Brooks Jr. FP (2001) Physiological measures of presence in virtual environments. Paper presented at the 4th Annual International Workshop on Presence (PRESENCE 2001), Philadelphia

  25. Slater M (2012) Inverse presence. http://presence-thoughts.blogspot.com/2012/05/inverse-presence.html. Accessed 15 June 2012

  26. Lombard M, Ditton T (1997) At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J Comput Mediat Commun 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x

  27. Slater M, Khanna P, Mortensen J, Yu I (2009) Visual realism enhances realistic response in an immersive virtual environment. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 29(3):76–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2009.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li F, Maher ML (2000) Representing virtual places - a design model for metaphorical design. In: Clayton MJ, de Velasco G (eds) Eternity, infinity and virtuality in architecture (ACADIA 2000). ACADIA, Washington D.C., pp 103–111. http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/Show?ab28

  29. Falconer L (2017) Experiencing sense of place in virtual and physical Avebury. Pers Ubiquit Comput 21(6):977–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1064-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bryson S (1995) Approaches to the successful design and implementation of VR applications. In: Rae AE, John AV, Jones H (eds) Virtual reality applications. Academic Press Ltd., London, pp 3–15

  31. Ghani I, Rafi A, Woods P (2016) Sense of place in immersive architectural virtual heritage environment. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Virtual System & Multimedia (VSMM) 2016. IEEE, Kuala Lumpur, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/VSMM.2016.7863169

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Relph E (2007) Spirit of place and sense of place in virtual reality. Techné: Res Philos Technol 10(3):17-25. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v10n3/relph.html

  33. Gutierrez M, Vexo F, Thalmann D (2008) Stepping into virtual reality. Springer-Verlag, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Slater M, Steed A, Usoh M (2013) Being there together: experiments on presence in virtual environments (1990s) technical report. Department of Computer Science, University College London, London

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ghani I, Rafi A, Woods P, Salleh AG (2012) Sense of place in virtual heritage environment: a review. In: Sidawi B, Reffat RM, Marsafawy HE, Wageeh SE, Bennadji A (eds) Proceedings of the 6th iInternational conference of the Arab Society for Computer Aided Architectural Design (ASCAAD). The Kingdom University, Manama, pp 181–189

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lewin C (2005) Elementary quantitative methods. In: Somekh B, Lewin C (eds) Research methods in the social sciences. SAGE Publications, London, pp 215–225

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dawson C (2002) Practical research methods. England, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  38. Marshall B, Cardon P, Poddar A, Fontenot R (2013) Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: a review of qualitative interviews in is research. J Comput Inf Syst 54(1):11–22

    Google Scholar 

  39. Trindade J, Fiolhais C, Almeida L (2002) Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study. Br J Educ Technol 33(4):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Santos BS, Dias P, Pimentel A, Baggerman J-W, Ferreira C, Silva S, Madeira J (2009) Head-mounted display versus desktop for 3D navigation in virtual reality: a user study. Multimed Tools Appl 41(1):161–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-008-0223-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim K, Rosenthal MZ, Zielinski D, Brady R (2012) Comparison of desktop, head mounted display, and six wall fully immersive systems using a stressful task. In: IEEE Virtual Reality Workshops (VRW), pp 143–144. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2012.6180922

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Rafi A, Salleh A, Paul A, Maulana R, Athar F, Pratiniyata G (2010) e-Warisan SENIBINA: Towards a collaborative architectural virtual heritage experience. In: 28th eCAADe conference: future cities ETH Zurich, Switzerland, pp 739–746

    Google Scholar 

  43. Someren MW, Barnard YF, JAC S (1994) The think aloud method: a practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  44. Turner P, Turner S (2006) Place, sense of place, and presence. Presence Teleop Virt 15(2):204–217. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.2006.15.2.204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gillham B (2005) Research interviewing: the range of techniques. Open University Press, Berkshire

    Google Scholar 

  46. Carrozzino M, Colombo M, Tecchia F, Evangelista C, Bergamasco M (2018) Comparing different storytelling approaches for virtual guides in digital immersive museums. In: LTD P, Bourdot P (eds) Augmented reality, virtual reality, and computer graphics. AVR 2018. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 10851. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hain Vr, Ganobjak M (2017) Forgotten industrial heritage in virtual reality-case study: old power plant in Piesˇt’any, Slovakia. Presence Teleop Virt 26(4):355-365 https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00309

  48. Baños RM, Botella C, Alcañiz M, Liaño V, Guerrero B, Rey B (2004) Immersion and emotion: their impact on the sense of presence. CyberPsychol Behav 7(6):734–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bekele MK, Pierdicca R, Frontoni E, Malinverni ES, Gain J (2018) A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. ACM J Comput Cult He 11(2):1–36

  50. Beheiry ME, Doutreligne S, Caporal C, Ostertag C, Dahan M, Masson J-B (2019) Virtual reality: beyond visualization. J Mol Biol 431(7):1315–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Izham Ghani.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghani, I., Rafi, A. & Woods, P. The effect of immersion towards place presence in virtual heritage environments. Pers Ubiquit Comput 24, 861–872 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-019-01352-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-019-01352-8

Keywords

Navigation