Skip to main content
Log in

Schuss- und Explosionsverletzungen der Gefäße

Präklinische und klinische Versorgung von traumatischen Gefäßverletzungen

Vascular injuries from firearms and explosive devices

Preclinical and clinical care of vascular trauma

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Gefässchirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Festnahmen von potenziellen Attentätern in Deutschland in den letzten Monaten legen die Vermutung nahe, dass Terroranschläge wie in Paris (2015) und Brüssel (2016) unter Einsatz von Schusswaffen und Explosivstoffen zu befürchten sind. Dies sind Situationen, in denen die individualmedizinischen Behandlungsansätze den Grundsätzen der Versorgung eines Massenanfalls von Verletzten weichen. Neuere Untersuchungen der Versorgung von gefäßverletzten, polytraumatisierten Patienten zeigen jedoch auch, dass selbst unter individualmedizinischen Aspekten die Schwere des Gefäßtraumas und damit die mit gängigen Trauma-Scoring-Systemen erwartete Prognose unterschätzt wird. Die im Sommer 2016 erschienene S3-Leitlinie Polytrauma/Schwerverletzten-Behandlung der federführenden Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie widmet sich durch Modifikation geltender Empfehlungen und Aufnahme von neuen Erkenntnissen in großen Teilen der Versorgung von kritischen Blutungen. Der Artikel befasst sich mit dem durch Einsatz von Schusswaffen und Explosivstoffen gefäßtraumatisierten Patienten. Neben dem Pathomechanismus von Schuss- und Explosionsverletzungen der Gefäße werden prä- und innerklinische Behandlungsoptionen auf Basis der S3-Leitlinie dem Leser vermittelt.

Abstract

The arrest of several potential assassins in Germany in recent months leads to the assumption that terror attacks with firearms and explosive devices like those that happened in Paris (2015) and Brussels (2016) could also take place in German cities. In such situations, the well-known treatment fundamentals in mass casualty incidents (MASCAL) take priority over the well-known fundamentals of individual medical treatment approaches. New research results emphasize that even under optimal treatment circumstances the outcome of vascular traumatized patients is underestimated when the mortality rate is calculated using established trauma score systems. The 2016 revised S3 clinical guideline Polytrauma‑/Schwerverletzten-Behandlung from the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (Polytrauma/severe injury treatment from the German Trauma Society) addresses the modification of existing recommendations and the inclusion of new findings in the treatment of critical bleeding. The following article focuses on vascular traumatized patients with gunshot wounds and injuries from explosive devices. In addition to the pathomechanism of shooting and explosion injuries, preclinical and clinical treatment options for critical bleeding are presented based on the S3 guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9
Abb. 10
Abb. 11
Abb. 12
Abb. 13

Literatur

  1. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) (2016) S3-Leitlinie Polytrauma/Schwerverletzten-Behandlung AWMF Register-Nr. 012/019 v. 01.07.2016

    Google Scholar 

  2. Almogy G, Luria T, Richter E et al (2005) Can external signs of trauma guide management? Lessons learned from suicide bombing attacks in Israel. Arch Surg 140:390–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barros D’Sa AAB (1981) A decade of missile-induced vascular trauma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 64:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brethauer SA, Chao A, Chambers LW et al (2008) Invasion vs Insurgency. US Navy/Marine Corps forward surgical care during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Arch Surg 143:564–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Butler FK, Greydanus D, Holcomb J (2006) Combat Evaluation of TCCC Techniques and Equipment: 2005. USAISR Report 2006–01. U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, San Antonio TX

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen AM, Smith VA, Ramos V et al (2012) Primary and secondary skeletal blast trauma. J Forensic Sci 57:6–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke JR, Trooskin SZ, Doshi PJ et al (2002) Time to laparotomy for intra-abdominal bleeding from trauma does affect survival for delay up to 90 min. J Trauma 52:420–425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Consultative Group on the Past (2009) Report, Belfast 23.01.2009. http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/victims/docs/consultative_group/cgp_230109_report.pdf. Zugegriffen: 19. Okt. 2016

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper GJ, Townend DJ, Cater SR et al (1991) The role of stress waves in the thoracic visceral injury from blast loading: modification of stress transmission by foams and high-density materials. J Biomech 24:273–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Demetriades D, Velmahos GC, Scalea TM et al (2008) Operative repair or endovascular graft stent in blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries: results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study. J Trauma 64:561–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DiMicoli M, Bieler D (2015) Explosionsverletzungen. In: Neitzel C, Ladehof K (Hrsg) Taktische Medizin – Notfallmedizin und Einsatzmedizin, 2. Aufl. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P et al (2012) Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:431–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fackler ML, Bellamy RF, Malinowski JA (1988) The wound profile: illustration of the missle-tissue interaction. J Trauma 28:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Frykberg ER, Tepas JJ (1988) Terrorist bombings: lessons learned from Belfast to Beirut. Ann Surg 208:569–576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gibson PW (1995) Amplification of air shock waves by textile materials. J Text Inst 86:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heldenberg E, Givon A, Simon D et al (2016) Civilian casualties of terror-related explosions: the impact of vascular trauma on treatment and prognosis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 81:435–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Heldenberg E, Givon A, Simon D et al (2014) Terror attacks increase the risk of vascular injuries. Front Public Health 2:47

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hinck DC, Neipp M, Debus ES (2014) Temporäre intravsale Shuntanlage (TIVS) – Eine nützlihce Ergänzung im Konzept der „vascular damage control surgery“ peripherer Gefäße der Extremitäten. Gefasschirurgie 19:481–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Horrocks C, Brett S (2000) Blast injury. Curr Anaesth Crit Care 11:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huber-Wagner S, Biberthaler P, Häberle S et al (2013) Whole-Body CT in haemodynamically unstable severely injured patients – a retrospective, multicentre study. PLOS ONE 8(7):e68880. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.006880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hull JB, Bowyer GW, Cooper GJ et al (1994) Pattern of injury in those dying from traumatic amputation caused by bomb blast. Br J Surg 81:1132–1135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kendall JL, Hoffenberg SR, Smith RS (2007) History of emergency and critical care ultrasound: the evolution of a new imaging paradigm. Crit Care Med 35(5):126–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. King DR, Larentzakis A, Ramly EP et al (2015) Tourniquet use at the Boston Marathon bombing: Lost in translation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78:594–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kluger Y (2003) Bomb explosions in acts of terrorism – detonation, wound ballistics, triage and medical concerns. Isr Med Assoc J 5:235–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kneubuehl BP (2008) Munition- und waffentechnische Grundlagen. In: Kneubuehl BO, Coupland RM, Rothschild MA et al (Hrsg) Wundballistik – Grundlagen und Anwendungen, 3. Aufl. Springer Medizin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kneubuehl BP (2008) Allgemeine Wundballistik. In: Kneubuehl BO, Coupland RM, Rothschild MA et al (Hrsg) Wundballistik – Grundlagen und Anwendungen, 3. Aufl. Springer Medizin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kragh JF, Littrel ML, Jones JA et al (2009) Battle casualty survival with emergency tourniquet use to stop limb bleeding. J Emerg Med 37(2):246–247

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lech L, Jerkku T, Kanz KG et al (2016) Bedeutung des Gefäßtraumas für die Schwerverletztenversorgung – Einfluss auf Verlauf und Mortalität. Zentralbl Chir 141:526–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Leibovici D, Gofrit ON, Stein M et al (1996) Blast injuries: bus versus open-air bombings – a comparative study of injuries in survivors of open-air versus confined-space explosions. J Trauma 41:1030–1035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lipschutz JH, Pascuzzi RM, Bognanno J et al (1991) Bilateral anterior cerebral artery infarction resulting from explosion-type injury to the head and neck. Stroke 22:813–815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Loh SA, Rockman CB, Chung C et al (2011) Existing trauma and critical care scoring systems underestimate mortality among vascular trauma patients. J Vasc Surg 53:359–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mainiero R, Sapko M, Defense Nuclear Agency, Alexandria VA (1996) Blast and fire propagation in underground facilities. http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc /pdf?AD=ADA314855. Zugegriffen: 20. Okt. 2016

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mellor SG, Cooper GJ (1989) Analysis of 828 servicemen killed or injured by explosion in Northern Ireland 1970–84: the Hostile Action Casualty System. Br J Surg 76:1006–1010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Miller PR, Fabian TC, Croce MA et al (2002) Prospective screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: analysis of diagnostic modalities and outcomes. Ann Surg 236:386–393

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Owen-Smith MS (1981) Hunterian lecture 1980: A computerized data retrieval system for the wounds of war: The northern Ireland casualties. J R Army Med Corps 127:31–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Owens BD, Kragh JF Jr, Wenke JC et al (2008) Combat wounds in operation Iraqi Freedom and operation Enduring Freedom. J Trauma 64:295–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Patel HD, Dryden S, Gupta A et al (2012) Pattern and mechanism of traumatic limb amputations after explosive blast: experience from the 07/07/05 London terrorist bombings. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:276–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Peleg K, Aharonson-Daniel L, Stein M et al (2004) Gunshot and explosion injuries – characteristics, outcomes, and implications for care of terror-related injuries in Israel. Ann Surg 239:311–318

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Remick KN, Schwab CW, Smith BP et al (2014) Defining the optimal time tot he operating room may salvage early trauma deaths. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76:1251–1258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shakur H, Roberts I, Bautista R et al (2010) Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 376:23–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sheffy N, Mintz Y, Rivkind AI et al (2006) Terror-related injuries: a comparison of gunshot wounds versus secondary-fragments induced injuries from explosives. J Am Coll Surg 203:297–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Siegel JH, Smith JA, Siddiqi SQ (2004) Change in velocity and energy dissipation on impact in motor vehicle crashes as a function oft he direction of crash: key factors in the production of thoracic aortic injuries, their pattern of associated injuries an patient survival. A crash injury research engineering network (CIREN) study. J Trauma 57:760–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. SprengG – Abschnitt I Allgemeine Vorschriften – §1 Anwendungsbereich

  44. Stannard A, Brown K, Benson C et al (2011) Outcome after vascular trauma in a deployed military trauma system. Br J Surg 98:228–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Teixeira PG, Inaha K, Barmparas G et al (2011) Blunt thoracic aortic injuries: an autopsy study. J Trauma 70:197–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tsokos M, Paulsen F, Petri S et al (2003) Histological, immune-histochemical and ultra-structural findings in human blast lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:549–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Waffengesetz WaffG Anlage 1 (zu §1 Abs. 4) Begriffsbestimmungen

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Hinck.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

D. Hinck, U. Unkelbach und E.S. Debus geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren. Alle Patienten, die über Bildmaterial oder anderweitige Angaben innerhalb des Manuskripts zu identifizieren sind, haben hierzu ihre schriftliche Einwilligung gegeben.

Additional information

Dieser aktualisierte Beitrag erschien ursprünglich in der Zeitschrift Notfall+Rettungsmedizin 10.1007/s10049-017-0294-6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hinck, D., Unkelbach, U. & Debus, E.S. Schuss- und Explosionsverletzungen der Gefäße. Gefässchirurgie 22, 271–284 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-017-0279-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-017-0279-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation