Skip to main content
Log in

Quality- from adequacy to fitness for purpose

  • Discussion Forum
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientific research and consequent progress, leads to the introduction of new concepts, new theories and new experimental methods and procedures. Their implementation, presentation and discussion, bring the associated need to choose and adopt the most appropriate terminology. The choice of the right words, definitions, or descriptions of all kinds, is far from being a minor task, demanding the best knowledge of the experts. As time goes by, this often requires revision and upgrading. In this work, Analytical Chemistry is the chosen scientific discipline, from where relevant examples are being taken and presented. Expression of acidity in terms of pH is addressed, covering a selection of developments where the author has been an active player along half a century, ranging from Chemistry to Metrology, hence involving expertise from both fields. Whilst much has been done, more is needed and continues to happen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cammann K (1992) Analytical chemistry—today’s definition and interpretation. Fresenius J Anal Chem 343:812–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. https://iupac.org/who-we-are/divisions/division-details/?body_code=500

  3. Hibbert DB, Korte E-H, Örnemark U (2021) Metrological and quality concepts in analytical chemistry (IUPAC recommendations 2021). Pure Appl Chem 93(9):997–1048. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2019-0819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. https://www.eurachem.org/

  5. International Vocabulary of Metrology (2008) 3rd edition, Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, Sèvres, France. www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/vim.html

  6. Williams A, de Bievre P (2014) Eurachem’s 25th anniversary: two members’ perspective. Accred Qual Assur 19:55–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1040-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Camões MF (2009) The quality of pH measurements 100 years after its definition. Accred Qual Assur 14:521–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-009-0573-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Filomena M, Camões GFC, Covington AK (1974) New procedure for calibrating glass electrodes. Anal Chem 46:1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Covington AK, Butikofer HP, Filomena Camões M, Ferrae MIA, Rebelo MJF (1985) Procedures for testing pH responsive glass electrodes at 25, 65 and 85ºC and determination of alkaline errors up to 1 mol dm-3 Na+, K+, Li+. Pure Appl Chem 57:887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Covington AK, Bates RG, Durst RA (1985) Definition of pH scales, standard reference values, measurement of pH and related terminology. Pure Appl Chem 57:531. https://doi.org/10.1515/iupac.57.0006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Buck RP, Rondinini S, Covington AK, Baucke FGK, Brett CMA, Camoes MF, Milton MJT, Mussini T, Naumann R, Pratt KW, Spitzer P, Wilson GS (2002) Measurement of pH Definition, standards, and procedures (IUPAC Recommendations 2002). Pure Appl Chem 74:2169. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200274112169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spitzer P, Seitz S (2010) Metrological traceability chain for pH measurement results. J Metrol Soc India 25(3):191–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-010-0019-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paul DB, René D, Aleš F, Hibbert DB (2011) Metrological traceability of measurement results in chemistry: concepts and implementation (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 83(10):1873–1935. https://doi.org/10.1351/PAC-REP-07-09-39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Paul De Bièvre, H Gunzler (2005) Traceability in chemical measurement. In: (ed) by Paul De Bièvre (Kasterlee, Belgium) and Helmut Günzler (Weinheim, Germany). Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

  15. Pingarrón JM, Labuda J, Barek J, Brett CMA, Camões MF, Miroslav Fojta D, Hibbert B (2019) Terminology of electrochemical methods of analysis (IUPAC recommendations 2019). Pure Appl Chem 92(4):641–694. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2018-0109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Camões MF, Anes B (2015) Traceability of pH to the mole. Water 7:4247–4255. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7084247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anes B, Ricardo JN, da Silva B, Martins HFP, Oliveira CS, Filomena Camões M (2015) Compatibility of activity coefficients estimated experimentally and by pitzer equations for the assessment of seawater pH. Accredit Qual Assur 21(1–7):2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1163-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marion GM, Millero FJ, Camões MF, Spitzer P, Feistel R, Chen C-TA (2011) pH of seawater. Mar Chem 126:89–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dickson AG, Camões MF, Spitzer P, Fisicaro P, Stoica D, Pawlowicz R, Feistel R (2015) Metrological challenges for measurements of key climatological observables. Part 3: seawater pH. Metrologia 53:R26–R39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bárbara A, da Silva B, Ricardo JN, Cristina O, Filomena CM (2019) Seawater pH measurements with a combination glass electrode and high ionic strength TRIS-TRIS HCl reference buffers – an uncertainty evaluation approach. Talanta 193:118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.09.075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stoica D, Anes BV, Fisicaro P, Camões MF (2021) Feasibility of multifunction calibration of H+-responsive glass electrodes in seawater (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 93(12):1487–1497. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2020-0202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Radtke V, Stoica D, Leito I, Camões MF, Krossing I, Bárbara A, Roziková M et al (2021) A unified pH scale for all solvents: part I - intention and reasoning (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 93(9):049–1060. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2019-0504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heering D, Stoica F, Camões B, Anes D, Nagy ZN, Szilágyi R, Quendera L, Ribeiro F, Bastkowski RB et al (2020) Symmetric potentiometric cells for the measurement of unified pH values. Symmetry 12:1150. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12071150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. da Silva RJN, Bettencourt SJ, Bárbara A, Agnes H, Ivo L, Teemu N, Daniela S et al (2021) Evaluation and validation of detailed and simplified models of the uncertainty of unified measurements in aqueous solutions. Anal Chim Acta 1182:338923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2021.338923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lainela S, Leito I, Heering A, Capitaine G, Anes B, Camões F, Stoica D (2021) Toward unified pH of saline solutions. Water 13(18):2522. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13182522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to acknowledge the Portuguese funding institution Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia-FCT, for supporting her research, namely through project FCT (UIDB/00100/2020 and UIDP/00100/2020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Filomena Camões.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Camões, M.F. Quality- from adequacy to fitness for purpose. Accred Qual Assur 28, 95–100 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-022-01511-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-022-01511-0

Keywords

Navigation