Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Zielgerichtete Therapie biliärer Tumoren

Targeted treatment of billary tract tumors

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Die Onkologie Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Biliäre Tumoren gehören mit jährlich 8000 Neuerkrankungen in Deutschland zu den seltenen malignen Neoplasien. Die Prognose für Patient:innen mit biliären Tumorerkrankungen ist weiterhin sehr schlecht. Nach langjähriger Stagnation ist es jedoch in den vergangenen Jahren zu einer Erweiterung der therapeutischen Optionen in der Systemtherapie gekommen: Zum einen ist die Immunonkologie Teil des Standard of Care in der Erstlinie geworden, zum anderen haben Studien in genetisch selektionierten Subgruppen das Potenzial zielgerichteter Strategien aufgezeigt.

Ziel

In dieser Arbeit geben die Autoren einen Überblick über die zielgerichtete Systemtherapie bei biliären Tumoren.

Material und Methode

Diese Arbeit basiert auf einer selektiven Literaturrecherche in der Datenbank PubMed zum Thema genetische Alterationen und zielgerichtete Therapien bei biliären Tumoren.

Ergebnisse

In bis zu 40 % der biliären Tumoren können genetische Alterationen gefunden werden, für die heute schon molekulare Therapien zur Verfügung stehen. Bislang liegt vorwiegend jedoch lediglich Evidenz aus kleinen einarmigen Phase-II Studien vor, was der niedrigen Inzidenz einzelner genetischer Alterationen in dieser seltenen Tumorentität geschuldet ist.

Schlussfolgerung

Bei biliären Tumoren sollte frühzeitig eine umfassende genetische Analyse der Tumoren durchgeführt werden. Für viele genetische Alterationen besteht heute noch keine Zulassung für die zielgerichtete Therapie, sodass diese Patient:innen in einem molekularen Tumorboard vorgestellt werden sollten. Zudem sind die jeweiligen genetischen Subgruppen sehr klein, sodass es eminent wichtig ist, dass geeignete Patient:innen konsequent in Therapiestudien und molekulare Register eingeschlossen werden.

Abstract

Background

Biliary tract tumors are rare malignant neoplasms with 8000 new cases per year in Germany. The prognosis for patients with biliary tumors is still very poor. However, after many years of stagnation, the number of options regarding systemic therapy has been increasing in recent years: on the one hand, immuno-oncology has become part of first-line standard of care, and on the other hand, studies in genetically selected subgroups have shown the potential of targeted strategies.

Objective

The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of targeted systemic therapy in biliary tumors.

Materials and methods

This work is based on a selective literature search of the PubMed database on genetic alterations and targeted therapies in biliary tumors.

Results

Genetic alterations can be found in up to 40% of cases of patients with biliary tumors, for which molecular therapies are already available today. However, many studies in the small genetic subgroups of a rare tumor entity have been performed as single-arm phase II studies without control arms.

Conclusion

Comprehensive genetic analysis of biliary tumors should be performed at an early stage. For many genetic alterations, there is no approval for targeted therapy today, so these patients should be presented in a molecular tumor board. Moreover, the respective genetic subgroups are very small, so that it is paramount that suitable patients are consistently included in therapy studies and molecular registries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Literatur

  1. Phelip JM, Desrame J, Edeline J et al (2021) Modified FOLFIRINOX versus CISGEM chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (PRODIGE 38 AMEBICA): a randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.00679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shroff RT, Guthrie KA, Scott AJ et al (2023) SWOG 1815: a phase III randomized trial of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine and cisplatin in newly diagnosed, advanced biliary tract cancers. J Clin Oncol 41(4_suppl):LBA490

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oh D‑Y, He AR, Qin S et al (2022) Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer. NEJM Evid 1(8):EVIDoa2200015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Piha-Paul SA, Oh DY, Ueno M et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced biliary cancer: results from the KEYNOTE-158 and KEYNOTE-028 studies. Int J Cancer 147(8):2190–2198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lamarca A, Palmer DH, Wasan HS et al (2021) Second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy versus active symptom control for advanced biliary tract cancer (ABC-06): a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 22(5):690–701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelley RK, Ueno M, Yoo C et al (2023) Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00727-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoo C, Kim KP, Jeong JH et al (2021) Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic biliary tract cancer after progression on gemcitabine plus cisplatin (NIFTY): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2b study. Lancet Oncol 22(11):1560–1572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vogel A, Bridgewater J, Edeline J et al (2023) Biliary tract cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 34(2):127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bitzer M, Gross S, Albert J et al (2023) Z Gastroenterol 61(4):420–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abou-Alfa GK, Sahai V, Hollebecque A et al (2020) Pemigatinib for previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 21(5):671–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Javle M, Roychowdhury S, Kelley RK et al (2021) Infigratinib (BGJ398) in previously treated patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements: mature results from a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 6(10):803–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park JO, Feng Y‑H, Chen Y‑Y et al (2019) Updated results of a phase IIa study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in Asian advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients with FGFR alterations. J Clin Oncol 37(15_suppl):4117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Javle MM, Abou-Alfa GK, Macarulla T et al (2022) Efficacy of derazantinib in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients with FGFR2 mutations or amplifications: Interim results from the phase 2 study FIDES-01. J Clin Oncol 40(4_suppl):427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goyal L, Meric-Bernstam F, Hollebecque A et al (2023) Futibatinib for FGFR2-rearranged Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 388(3):228–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Casaletto J, Maglic D, Toure BB et al (2021) Abstract 1455: RLY-4008, a novel precision therapy for FGFR2-driven cancers designed to potently and selectively inhibit FGFR2 and FGFR2 resistance mutations. Cancer Res 81(13_Supplement):1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu AX, Macarulla T, Javle MM et al (2021) Final overall survival efficacy results of Ivosidenib for patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with IDH1 mutation: the phase 3 randomized clinical ClarIDHy trial. JAMA Oncol 7(11):1669–1677. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Javle M, Borad MJ, Azad NS et al (2021) Pertuzumab and trastuzumab for HER2-positive, metastatic biliary tract cancer (MyPathway): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2a, multiple basket study. Lancet Oncol 22(9):1290–1300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cannon TL, Rothe M, Garrett-Mayer E et al (2023) Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (P+T) in patients (pts) with biliary tract cancer (BTC) with ERBB2/3 amplification (amp), overexpression (oe), or mutation (mut): Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) study. J Clin Oncol 41(4_suppl):546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee CK, Chon HJ, Cheon J et al (2023) Trastuzumab plus FOLFOX for HER2-positive biliary tract cancer refractory to gemcitabine and cisplatin: a multi-institutional phase 2 trial of the Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG-HB19-14). Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 8(1):56–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ohba A, Morizane C, Kawamoto Y et al (2022) Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201) in patients (pts) with HER2-expressing unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC): An investigator-initiated multicenter phase 2 study (HERB trial). J Clin Oncol 40(16_suppl):4006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Meric-Bernstam F, Beeram M, Hamilton E et al (2022) Zanidatamab, a novel bispecific antibody, for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic HER2-expressing or HER2-amplified cancers: a phase 1, dose-escalation and expansion study. Lancet Oncol 23(12):1558–1570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakamura Y, Nobumasa M, Sunakawa Y et al (2023) Tucatinib and trastuzumab for previously treated HER2-positive metastatic biliary tract cancer (SGNTUC-019): A phase 2 basket study. J Clin Oncol 2023 41(16_suppl):4007–4007. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.4007

  23. Harding JJ, Piha-Paul SA, Shah RH et al (2023) Antitumour activity of neratinib in patients with HER2-mutant advanced biliary tract cancers. Nat Commun 14(1):630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Subbiah V, Lassen U, Elez E et al (2020) Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF(V600E)-mutated biliary tract cancer (ROAR): a phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicentre basket trial. Lancet Oncol 21(9):1234–1243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Subbiah V, Kreitman RJ, Wainberg ZA et al (2023) Dabrafenib plus trametinib in BRAFV600E-mutated rare cancers: the phase 2 ROAR trial. Nat Med 29(5):1103–1112. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02321-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Meric-Bernstam F, Rothe M, Garrett-Mayer E et al (2022) Cobimetinib plus vemurafenib (C+V) in patients (Pts) with solid tumors with BRAF V600E/d/k/R mutation: Results from the targeted agent and profiling utilization registry (TAPUR) study. J Clin Oncol 40(16_suppl):3008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schram AM, Goto K, Kim D‑W et al (2022) Efficacy and safety of zenocutuzumab, a HER2 x HER3 bispecific antibody, across advanced NRG1 fusion (NRG1+) cancers. J Clin Oncol 40(16_suppl):105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Carrizosa DR, Burkard ME, Elamin YY et al (2022) CRESTONE: Initial efficacy and safety of seribantumab in solid tumors harboring NRG1 fusions. J Clin Oncol 40(16_suppl):3006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Drilon A, Laetsch TW, Kummar S et al (2018) Efficacy of larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children. N Engl J Med 378(8):731–739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Doebele RC, Drilon A, Paz-Ares L et al (2020) Entrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours: integrated analysis of three phase 1–2 trials. Lancet Oncol 21(2):271–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Subbiah V, Cassier PA, Siena S et al (2022) Pan-cancer efficacy of pralsetinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumors from the phase 1/2 ARROW trial. Nat Med 28(8):1640–1645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Subbiah V, Wolf J, Konda B et al (2022) Tumour-agnostic efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumours other than lung or thyroid tumours (LIBRETTO-001): a phase 1/2, open-label, basket trial. Lancet Oncol 23(10):1261–1273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bekaii-Saab TS, Yaeger R, Spira AI et al (2023) Adagrasib in advanced solid tumors harboring a KRAS(G12C) mutation. J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.00434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kendre G, Murugesan K, Brummer T, Segatto O, Saborowski A, Vogel A (2023) Charting co-mutation patterns associated with actionable drivers in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 78(3):614–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2022.11.030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cowzer D, Huq R, Perry M et al (2023) Clinical outcomes for IDH1 mutant biliary tract cancer (BTC) treated with contemporary systemic therapy. J Clin Oncol 41(4_suppl):513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu MJ, Shi L, Dubrot J et al (2022) Mutant IDH inhibits IFNgamma-TET2 signaling to promote Immunoevasion and tumor maintenance in cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Discov 12(3):812–835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yan M, Schwaederle M, Arguello D, Millis SZ, Gatalica Z, Kurzrock R (2015) HER2 expression status in diverse cancers: review of results from 37,992 patients. Cancer Metastasis Rev 34(1):157–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Silverman IM, Murugesan K, Lihou CF et al (2019) Comprehensive genomic profiling in FIGHT-202 reveals the landscape of actionable alterations in advanced cholangiocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 37(15_suppl):4080

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arndt Vogel.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Vogel: Consultancy and advisory role: AstraZeneca, Amgen, BeiGene, Böhringer Mannheim, BMS, BTG, Daichi-Sankyo, EISAI, Incyte, Ipsen, MSD, PierreFabre, Roche, Servier, Sirtex, Tahio, Terumo. A. Saborowski: Honoraria from BMS, Roche, Servier, Ipsen, Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD, Travel support: Ipsen, Servier, Pierre-Fabre, MSD, Adboard: Eisai, MSD. C. Gerdes gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vogel, A., Gerdes, C. & Saborowski, A. Zielgerichtete Therapie biliärer Tumoren. Onkologie 29, 793–800 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-023-01386-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-023-01386-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords