Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Evaluating historical simulations of CMIP5 GCMs for key climatic variables in Zhejiang Province, China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessing the regional impact of climate change on agriculture, hydrology, and forests is vital for sustainable management. Trustworthy projections of climate change are needed to support these assessments. In this paper, 18 global climate models (GCMs) from the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) are evaluated for their ability to simulate regional climate change in Zhejiang Province, Southeast China. Simple graphical approaches and three indices are used to evaluate the performance of six key climatic variables during simulations from 1971 to 2000. These variables include maximum and minimum air temperature, precipitation, wind speed, solar radiation, and relative humidity. These variables are of great importance to researchers and decision makers in climate change impact studies and developing adaptation strategies. This study found that most GCMs failed to reproduce the observed spatial patterns, due to insufficient resolution. However, the seasonal variations of the six variables are simulated well by most GCMs. Maximum and minimum air temperatures are simulated well on monthly, seasonal, and yearly scales. Solar radiation is reasonably simulated on monthly, seasonal, and yearly scales. Compared to air temperature and solar radiation, it was found that precipitation, wind speed, and relative humidity can only be simulated well at seasonal and yearly scales. Wind speed was the variable with the poorest simulation results across all GCMs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements—FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RJ, Norris JR, Wild M (2013) Evaluation of multidecadal variability in CMIP5 surface solar radiation and inferred underestimation of aerosol direct effects over Europe, China, Japan, and India. J Geophys Res 118:6311–6336. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ault TR, Cole JE, Overpeck JT, Pederson GT, Meko DM (2014) Assessing the risk of persistent drought using climate model simulations and paleoclimate data. J Climate 27: 7529–7549. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00282.1

  • Brands A, Herrera S, Fernandez F, Gutierrez JM (2013) How well do CMIP5 Earth System Models simulate present climate. Clim Dyn 41:8-03-817. doi: 10.1007/s00382-013-1742-8

  • Chen L, Frauenfeld OW (2014) A comprehensive evaluation of precipitation simulations over China based on CMIP5 multimodel aggregate projections. J Geophy Res Atmos 119:5767–5786. doi:10.1002/2013JD021190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Brissette FP, Poulin A, Leconte R (2011) Overall uncertainty study of the hydrological impacts of climate change for a Canadian watershed. Water Resour Res 47:W12509. doi:10.1029/2011WR010602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devis A, Lipzig NPM, Demuzere M (2014) A height dependent evaluation of wind and temperature over Europe in the CMIP5 Earth System Models. Climate Res 61:41–56. doi:10.3354/cr01242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobler C, Bürger G, Stötter J (2012) Assessment of climate change impacts on flood hazard potential in the Alpine Lech watershed. J Hydrol 460:29–39. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong L, Xu C, Chen D, Halldin S, Chen YD (2006) Sensitivity of the Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration to key climatic variables in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) basin. J Hydrol 329:620–629. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.03.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta H, Sorooshian S, Yapo P (1999) Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Eng J Hydrol 2(135):135–143. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immerzeel WW, Van Beek LP, Bierkens MF (2010) Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science 328:1382–1385. doi:10.1126/science.1183188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay AL, Davies HN, Bell VA, Jones RG (2009) Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England. Clim Chang 92:41–63. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9471-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Materia S, Dirmeyer PA, Guo Z, Alessandri A, Nvarra A (2010) The sensitivity of simulated river discharge to land surface representation and meteorological forcings. J Hydrometeoro 11:334–351. doi:10.1175/2009JHM1162.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVicar TR, Van Niel TG, Li LT, Hutchinson MF, Mu XM, Liu ZH (2007) Spatially distributing monthly reference evapotranspiration and pan evaporation considering topographic influences. J Hydrol 338:196–220. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.02.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehran A, AghaKouchak A, Phillips TJ (2014) Evaluation of CMIP5 continental precipitation simulations relative to satellite-based gauge-adjusted observations. J Geophys Res 119:1695–1707. doi:10.1002/2013JD021152

    Google Scholar 

  • Najafi M, Moradkhani H, Jung I (2011) Assessing the uncertainties of hydrologic model selection in climate change impact studies. Hydrol Process 25:2814–2826. doi:10.1002/hyp.8043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasonova ON, Gusev YM, Kovalev YE (2011) Impact of uncertainties in meteorological forcing data and land surface parameters on global estimates of terrestrial water balance components. Hydrol Process 25:1074–1090. doi:10.1002/hyp.7651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicks AD, Lane LJ, Gander GA (1995) Chapter 2: weather generator. In: Flanagan and Nearing, USDA—Water Erosion Prediction Project Hillslope Profile and Watershed Model Documentation., pp 2.1–2.22

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyeko-Ogiramoi P, Ngirane-Katashaya G, Willems P, Ntegeka V (2010) Evaluation and inter-comparison of Global Climate Models’ performance over Katonga and Ruizi catchments in Lake Victoria basin. Phys Chem Earth 35:618–633. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2010.07.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piao S, Ciais P, Huang Y, Shen Z, Peng S, Li J, Zhou L, Liu H, Ma Y, Ding Y, Friedlingstein P, Liu C, Tan K, Yu Y, Zhang T, Fang J (2010) The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature 2;467(7311): 43–51. doi: 10.1038/nature09364

  • Qian B, Gameda S, Hayhoe H, De Jong R, Bootsma A (2004) Comparison of LARS-WG and AAFC-WG stochastic weather generators for diverse Canadian climates. Clim Res 26:175–191. doi:10.3354/cr026175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig C, Elliott J, Deryng D, Ruane AC, Müller C, Arneth A, Boote KJ, Folberth C, Glotter M, Khabarov N, Neumann K, Piontek F, Pugh TAM, Schmid E, Stehfest E, Yang H, Jones JW (2014) Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(9):3268–3273. doi:10.1073/pnas.1222463110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp DE, Abatzoglou JT, Hegewisch KC, Mote PW (2013) Evaluation of CMIP5 20th century climate simulations for the Pacific Northwest USA. J Geophys Res 118:10884–10906. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50843

    Google Scholar 

  • Safeeq M, Fares A (2012) Hydrologic response of a Hawaiian watershed to future climate change scenarios. Hydrol Process 26:2745–2764. doi:10.1002/hyp.8328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MA, Stratonovitch P (2010) Use of multi-model aggregates from global climate models for assessment of climate change impacts. Clim Res 40(1):1–14. doi:10.3354/cr00836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw EM (1994) Hydrology in practice. T.J. International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall, Great Britain

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi XG, Wild M, Lettenmaier DP (2010) Surface radiative fluxes over the span-Arctic land region: variability and trends. J Geophys Res 115:D22104. doi:10.1029/2010JD01442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su F, Duan X, Chen D, Hao Z, Cuo L (2014) Evaluation of the global climate models in the cmip5 over the tibetan plateau. J Climate 26:3187–3208. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00321.1

  • Van der Velde Y, Lyon YSW, Destouni G (2013) Data-driven regionalization of river discharges and emergent land cover-evapotranspiration relationships across Sweden. J Geophys Res 118:2576–2587. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50224

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Miao C (2008) Climate and its change in Zhejiang Province. Meteorological Press, China (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems P, Vrac M (2011) Statistical precipitation downscaling for small-scale hydrological impact investigations of climate change. J Hydrol 402:193–205. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woldemeskel FM, Sharma A, Sivakumar B, Mehrotra R (2012) An error estimation method for precipitation and temperature projections for future climates. J Geophys Res 117:D22104. doi:10.1029/2012JD018062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Xu CH (2012) Preliminary assessment of simulations of climate changes over China by CMIP5 multi-models. Atmos Oceanic Sci letters 5(6):489–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C-Y, Widén E, Halldin S (2005) Modelling hydrological consequences of climate change—progress and challenges. Adv Atmos Sci 22:789–797. doi:10.1007/BF02918679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu YP, Zhang X, Tian Y (2012) Impact of climate change on 24-h design rainfall depth estimation in Qiantang River Basin. East China Hydrol Process 26(26):4067–4077. doi:10.1002/hyp.9210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu YP, Zhang X, Ran Q, Tian Y (2013) Impact of climate change on hydrology of upper reaches of Qiantang River Basin, East China. J Hydrol 483:51–60. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu YP, Pan S, Fu G, Tian Y, Zhang X (2014) Future potential evapotranspiration changes and contribution analysis in Zhejiang Province, East China. J Geophys Res 119(5):2174–2192. doi:10.1002/2013JD021245

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Yang D (2012) Climatic factors influencing changing pan evaporation across China from 1961–2991. J Hydrol 480:58–58. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.043

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Luo Y, Huan JB (2012) Evaluation and projection of temperature extremes over China based on CMIP5 Model. Adv Clim Chang Res 3(4):179–185. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1248.2012.00179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Xu YP, Fu G (2014) Uncertainties in SWAT extreme flow simulation under climate change. J Hydrol 515:205–222. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LR14E090001), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51379183), and International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China (2010DFA24320). We are grateful to the China Meteorological Administration and Zhejiang Meteorological Bureau for providing meteorological data in Zhejiang Province. Many thanks are also given to Dr. Qian Budong from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada for providing valuable comments on this manuscript. Finally, the comments from the editor and anonymous reviewers are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Hydrology and Water Resources, Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China

    Weidong Xuan, Chong Ma, Haiting Gu, Suli Pan & Yue-Ping Xu

  2. Zhejiang Institute of Meteorological Research, Zhejiang, China

    Lili Kang

Authors
  1. Weidong Xuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chong Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lili Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Haiting Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Suli Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yue-Ping Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yue-Ping Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xuan, W., Ma, C., Kang, L. et al. Evaluating historical simulations of CMIP5 GCMs for key climatic variables in Zhejiang Province, China. Theor Appl Climatol 128, 207–222 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1704-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1704-7

Keywords